The World of T.C.Lethbridge

Premonitions by Rupert Sheldrake

Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:08:36 +0100

Appendix H. Premonitions by Rupert Sheldrake

© Rupert Sheldrake 2012 [1]

Many animals seemed to anticipate the great Asian tsunami on 26 December 2004, although their reactions were much closer to the actual event. Elephants in Sri Lanka and Sumatra moved to high ground before the giant waves struck; they did the same in Thailand, trumpeting beforehand.

According to villagers in Bang Koey, Thailand, a herd of buffalo were grazing by the beach when they 'suddenly lifted their heads and looked out to sea, ears standing upright.' They turned and stampeded up the hill, followed by bewildered villagers, whose lives were thereby saved.

At Ao Sane beach, near Phuket, dogs ran up to the hilltops, and at Galle in Sri Lanka, dog owners were puzzled when their animals refused to go for their usual morning walk on the beach.

In Cuddalore District in south India, buffaloes, goats and dogs escaped by moving to higher ground, and so did a nesting colony of flamingoes.

In the Andaman Islands, 'stone age' tribal groups moved away from the coast before the disaster, alerted by the behaviour of animals.

How did they know? The usual speculation is that the animals picked up tremors caused by the under-sea earthquake. But this explanation is unconvincing. There would have been tremors all over South East Asia, not just in the afflicted coastal areas.

Some animals anticipate other kinds of natural disaster like avalanches, and even man-made catastrophes. During the Second World War, many families in Britain and Germany relied on their pets' behaviour to warn them of impending air raids before official warnings were given. The animal reactions occurred when enemy planes were still hundreds of miles away, long before the animals could have heard them coming. Some dogs in London anticipated the explosion of German V-2 rockets. These missiles were supersonic and could not have been heard in advance.

With very few exceptions, the ability of animals to anticipate disasters has been ignored by Western scientists; the subject is taboo. By contrast, since the 1970s, in earthquake-prone areas of China, the authorities have encouraged people to report unusual animal behaviour, and Chinese scientists have an impressive track record in predicting earthquakes. In several cases they have issued warnings that enabled cities to be evacuated hours before devastating earthquakes struck, saving tens of thousands of lives.

By paying attention to unusual animal behaviour, as the Chinese do, earthquakes and tsunami warning systems might be feasible in many parts of the world that are at risk from these disasters. Millions of people could be asked to take part in this project through the media. They could be told what kinds of behaviour their pets and other animals might show if a disaster were imminent - in general, signs of anxiety or fear. If people noticed these signs, or any other unusual behaviour, they would immediately telephone a hotline with a memorable number - for example, in California, 1-800-PET QUAKE. Or they could send a message on the Internet.

A computer system would analyze the places of origin of the incoming messages. It there was an unusually large number, it would signal an alarm, and display on a map the places from which the calls were coming. There would probably be a background of false alarms from people whose pets were sick, for example, and there might also be scattered hoax calls. But if there was a sudden surge of calls from a particular region, this could indicate that an earthquake or tsunami was imminent.

Exploring the potential for animal-based warning systems would cost relatively little. From a practical point of view, it does not matter how animals know: they can give useful warnings whatever the explanation. It it turns out that they are indeed reacting to subtle physical changes, then seismologists should be able to use instruments to make better predictions themselves. If it turns out that presentment plays a part, we will learn something important about the nature of time and causation. By ignoring animal premonitions, or by explaining them away, we will learn nothing.[2]

End Notes

[1] First published as part of Chapter 9 Are Psychic Phenomena Illusory? in The Science Delusion: Freeing the Spirit of Enquiry by Rupert Sheldrake (Hodder & Stoughton, London, 2012, 392 pages, £8.99, ISBN 978 1 444 72794 4).

[2] See also three other books by Rupert Sheldrake: Seven Experiments That Could Change The World (1994; new edition 2002); Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home (1999; new edition 2011); The Sense of Being Stared At (2003).

Comments

Dowsing by Wilhelm Reich

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:54:42 +0200

Appendix G. Dowsing as an Object of Orgonomic Research by Wilhelm Reich

© Wilhelm Reich 1951 [1]

The discovery of water veins or concealed springs in the earth occupied a peculiar position in natural research for a long time. On the one hand, the use of the dowsing rod was laughed at; ‘divining’, as it is called, was discarded as mystical or charlatanry by ‘rigorous, objective, physical scientific research’.

No serious scientific researcher, so it was said, believed in the fairy tale of the dowsing rod. On the other hand, as is widely known, farmers and mountaineers used the ‘mysterious’ dowsing rod to uncover springs. The dowsing rod furnishes in practice what ‘exact physics’ so far had not succeeded in accomplishing: It discovers water in the ground.

In World War I the dowsing rod was highly esteemed in the dry Alpine areas (‘Korst’). In World War II the English Royal Air Force is said to have used the dowsing rod with great success. But the nature and mechanism of the discovery of water springs by means of the dowsing rod remained a mystery, exposed to the suspicion of charlatanry and mysticism.

In 1949, S.W. Tromp, Professor of Geology in Cairo University, had devoted some effort to the elucidation of the finding of water by way of dowsing. [2] Orgone Physics came to contribute to the understanding of dowsing in 1946 when I had a man who was supposed to practice dowsing come to Orgonon. The man displayed no special traits of character which would have marked him as a mystic. He explained to me that he had for many years - without asking money for it - been occupied with the discovery of water springs. He had learned the art long ago from a farmer’s wife. He could, so he claimed, find any water vein which was not more than fifteen feet under the surface of the earth.

I had him introduce me to his art while I led him into the neighbourhood of an old, concealed well. He cut a V-shaped branch from a young apple tree and held firmly with both hands so that the point of the V was directed upward and slightly forward; it was about the height of the pit of his stomach.

When he approached the region of the concealed well, the freely-moving end of the branch turned with great force towards his body. One could see that the man had to exert himself strenuously to hold the branch firm. I confess that I had the impression of a mystical process; I did not understand what was happening.

How was it possible that the branch turned at all? The man explained that one must cut the branch fresh from the tree if one wanted to obtain good results. Old, dead branches do not function. I had at first believed that the branch was drawn to the earth in the neighbourhood of the water. This later proved to be erroneous. In dowsing as we saw it, to be sure, it appeared as if the discovery of the water were an accomplishment of the branch. This erroneous conception is at the basis of the mystical interpretation of the process.

The farmers in this neighbourhood call the process of discovering water by means of the dowsing rod ‘divining’, which reveals the religious-mystical explanation clearly enough.

I had the man, with his dowsing branch, walk over a location where a water pipe, which supplied the laboratory with water, was buried five feet under the surface. Exactly at the spot where the pipe was buried, the branch turned downward, even though not as strongly as at the well. The man showed no sign of trance or any similar condition. He only appeared to be very attentively concentrating on the branch.

He walked now, with the branch in his hands, over a part of the terrain around the laboratory. At a certain place the branch began to turn downward. The man followed the direction. The movement of the branch became increasingly strong until finally the man could hardly hold it. “Here, at this spot,” he said confidently, “lies a water source not deeper than fifteen feet. You can depend on that.”

Since the dowsing rod had already twice designated the presence of water unknown to the dowser, I had no reason to doubt that the man was also right this time. Two years later, it turned out that water was accumulating on this spot deep in the ground, due to a special hollow formation of the terrain which permitted water coming down to remain there.

I now took up the rod myself and held it in my hands exactly as he had shown me. I walked across the same terrain, and quickly my doubting academism vanished. There was no doubt about it: The branch moved downward, slowly at first and then more strongly. The same thing happened when I walked over the water pipe in the ground, and when I approached the old well; more weakly at the pipe than at the well. Still I did not understand how this attraction was possible. A half-hour later the riddle was less obscure.

I repeated the procedure several times while I changed the position of the branch. Held laterally to the body, the branch gave no reaction in the same place where it had reacted strongly in the original position in front of the upper abdomen. The movement of the branch thus had something to do with its position relative to the body of the water finder.

The branch reacted weakly or not at all if one held it far away from one’s own body, just as it had little effect when one held it laterally to the body. Now it struck me that the freely moving point of the branch moved most strongly at the height of the pit of the stomach. That could be explained only if the middle of the body moved the branch toward itself.

The finding of the water is thus not at all an accomplishment of the branch or rod. The branch only plays the role of an indicator. It is the organism of the dowser which reacts to the water in the ground. This reaction is expressed in the form of an attraction of the freely moving end of the branch to the body and not to the spring. Thus it became understandable why the branch always turned toward the body and never away from the body to the earth, at least according to this single observation.

I had several experimental workers at the laboratory repeat the procedure. One assistant failed to react at all. Another felt a weak pull in his hands, a resistance of the branch against movement away from the body. A third and a fourth each felt a similar peculiar sensation in the solar plexus [3], when the branch was attracted.

The next step was the following conclusion: The organism reacts (without any perception) to the spring in the ground with orgonotic excitation, since both the organism and the water are strongly orgonotic and represent two orgonotic systems. It seems as if it were the plexus solaris in particular which reacts with excitation and attraction to the water. And it has been known for a long time that orgone energy and water are mutually attractive. In this way the riddle of the attraction of the branch is solved.

The drawing at the start of the article is to illustrate that the attraction between moving palms, [4] the scenting of water by dogs and other animals, etc., are akin to these functions.

To summarize: the dowsing rod does not move to the water, but is attracted by the body of the dowser.
Not the dowsing rod, but the bio-energetic life apparatus of the dowser reacts to the water in the ground.
The attractive reaction of the dowser apparently depends upon excitation of the bio-energetic system, which is accompanied by increased attraction in the orgonotic field surrounding the body. The organism and the water react upon one another as any two orgonotic systems with excitation and attraction. The dowsing organism must apparently be orgonotically vigorous in order to react with excitation to water and to attract the dowsing rod. An orgonotic or armoured organisms will get little or no reaction since the attraction in the orgone energy field is too weak to attract the branch.

Thus, again, the bio-energetic structure and sensitivity of the observer enters into the observation and detection of natural functions as a decisive factor. [5] No mystical operation whatever is here involved.

In order to test the given interpretation of the function of dowsing, I had to be able to reproduce it also without the presence of water. If my explanation were correct. That the dowsing rod effect depends upon the excitation and attraction in the contact of two strong orgonotic systems, then the same effect must result if the organism approaches a strong orgone energy accumulator. This expectation was confirmed:

The branch was attracted to my body when I stepped into the metal-lined orgone energy room. The effect was strengthened, clearly and irrefutably, when I approached the 20-fold orgone energy accumulator from the outside or when I sat in it.

It was a further valid proof off the correctness of the explanation, that the attractive influence in the accumulator was especially strong when I subjectively felt the well-known lumination sensation of ‘prickling’ warmth in my body.

The orgonotic potency of an organism can be roughly measured by means of the lumination of the incandescent bulb at the orgone field meter. [6] The lumination of the incandescent filament stands in direct relationship to the orgonity of the organism. Our dowser showed the strongest lumination at the orgone energy field meter, fully corresponding to the strength of the attraction of the rod in his hand. My reaction was somewhat weaker, those persons who had not reacted with the dowsing branch showed the weakest lumination of the apparatus.

The heretofore so mysteriously conceived function of dowsing may fall into line with the many other bio-energetic observations already well known for a long time: (a) The clear-cut attraction felt between one’s palms during mutual approach alternating with removal; (b) The ability of certain individuals to attract growing, green branches of certain flowers by approach and removal of their palms; (c) The activation of a Geiger-Müller device with the orgone energy field of the palm in bio-energetically strong organisms; (d) The orgonotic sensation of the presence of unseen persons in the dark. [7]

I believe that these facts speak a clear enough language, but they should be carefully tested from the standpoint of orgone biophysics. Their function submits without contradiction to the theory of orgone biophysics. The discovery of water sources by means of the dowsing rod, and similar functions, demonstrate the organism and the orgonotic sensation as tools of natural research in the clearest light.

The scientific conception and understanding of the function follow from the knowledge of the specific laws which govern orgone energy, i.e., Life Energy. The orgonotic contact between the living organism and a part of nature gains great importance as a principle of exploration of nature.

End Notes

[1] First published by the Orgone Institute Press in Orgone Energy Bulletin (Vol 3, No 3, July 1951, pps 139-143).
[2] Psychical Physics by S.W. Tromp (Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1949).
[3] The Solar Plexus chakra lies between the Sacral and Heart chakras and begins to open around the age of seven...suggesting an interesting set of dowsing experiments for infant schools. [Editor].
[4] See X-ray picture of orgonotic excitation in Orgone Energy Bulletin (Number 1/2 p50, 1949).
[5] Compare the section on Organ Sensation as a Tool of Natural Research in Ether, God and Devil, Chapter III.
[6] See The Discovery of the Orgone by Wilhelm Reich (Volume II, pps 124-127).
[7] See The Science Delusion by Rupert Sheldrake...extract included as Appendix H.

Comments

History of Dowsing

Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:28:23 +0200

Appendix F. The History of Dowsing by Hamish Miller
© Hamish Miller 2002

In the mid 5th century BC the ‘father of history' Herodotus the Greek reported the use of wooden Y-forks for the finding of water while he was roving around Scythia north of the Black Sea. It's the first written evidence of true dowsing, although there are references to similar functions in ancient Chinese literature.

Cave drawings from thousands of years ago have been claimed to depict dowsing implements of various shapes but it's difficult to believe that these slightly hairy outlines are anything to do with dowsing. A silver coin struck in 936 AD clearly shows a wee man with a forked stick in action above mine workings.

Martin Luther outrageously pronounced that it was "Devil's Work” in the early 16th century and as a result the art has been fiercely opposed by religious establishments for centuries. Fortunately the knowledge was preserved and passed on quietly by people whose lives were closely connected to the earth.

About the same time a German mineralogist and metallurgist called Georgius Agricola published De Re Metallica, a treatise which included precise details of dowsing techniques in mining. It aroused considerable interest in the industry throughout Europe although Agricola himself, still acutely conscious of the association of the art to the occult, hedged his bets by admonishing prospective miners "not to make use of the enchanted twig”.

Elizabeth I of England first got wind of the valuable ‘forked stick' methods of finding metal ores through Agricola's work and introduced German miners to help develop England's resources. They brought their knowledge of dowsing with them, and by 1660 Charles II, recognising the importance of the art to the financial success of the mining industry, demanded to know everything about the operation of the ‘Baguette Divinitoire'…splendid name for a dowsing rod.

In 1693 Pierre de Lorrain, Abbé de Vallemont caused consternation in religious circles and Paris society by publishing his Occult Physics which included detailed illustrations of dowsing techniques. It was promptly put on the prohibited list by the Inquisition, and he was probably one of the first authors to create a bestseller by having his book banned. His work triggered a vigorous pro- and anti- debate in the world of scientists and religious leaders, leading to a proliferation of scientific tests on the abilities of dowsers over the next century.

In museums round the world there are some fine examples of seventeenth and eighteenth century artwork, including silver drinking mugs, paintings and Meissen pottery, which figure little men with Y-rods akimbo looking for minerals. The burgeoning mining industry was a major contributor to the development of dowsing and the art thrived under the increasing pressure to find more and more mineral and water sources.

In eighteenth century France, Germany and Italy, the use of ‘wands', ‘sceptres', ‘deusers', ‘twiggers', ‘dowsers', and ‘water-witchers' to find all sorts of things became fair game for scientists and priests to investigate, and for the public to have fun with. A plethora of essays and publications by Lebrun, Menestrier, Zeidler, Albinus and Thouvenal fired broadsides at each other for and against the mysterious art.

Barthelemy Bleton, a brilliant natural water-witcher, working with the Bishop of Grenoble (author of the ‘Bishop's Rule' for finding the depth of water) became the focus of Thouvenal's attempt to associate dowsing with electrical effects, but physicists could find no simple explanation of his talents.

Further work in Italy with the elegant Pennet, who constantly confounded observers by achieving remarkably accurate results, still failed to persuade the authorities that dowsing was a talent worthy of serious debate. On the contrary it seemed that as ‘absolute proof' in scientific terms was not readily available it was easier to accept the French astronomer LaLande's arrogant dismissal of all dowsing as trickery. He put dowsing rods in the same category as ‘flying ships' declaring "it is impossible for a man to raise himself from the ground”. A year later the Montgolfier brothers were off in their first balloon.

In the late eighteenth century William Cookworthy of Plymouth, England gave the art a shot in the arm by chronicling the undeniable talents of the Cornish mining dowsers. They had earned their reputation purely by the accurate results they had produced for that very tough industry, and had begun to be rewarded accordingly.

For a time local people who ‘could just do it' were used to find water sources, but gradually some eminent Victorian British and Irish geologists became aware of the growing water needs of industry and the larger estates. One of the greatest practitioners of all time was Wiltshire's John Mullins. The legendary stories of his successes probably did more to make dowsing acceptable in the right circles than any contemporary academic papers.

In 1912 the mighty Metallica was translated from Latin to English by Mining Magazine in London, and sparked a fresh interest for many lateral thinkers of all disciplines. Then, in 1969, Guy Underwood's The Patterns of the Past broke new ground by exploring in meticulous detail the energies of sacred sites and their connections with water.

In 1976 Tom Lethbridge's The Power of the Pendulum explored other realities and in 1978 their work and the perceptions of John Michell inspired Tom Graves to write Needles of Stone, a dowsing book which introduced far-reaching concepts of our relationship with earth and cosmic energies.

In the last few decades an international array of dowsers have applied their talents to an expanding range of dowsing disciplines.

Terry Ross from Vermont could find water for villages in Mexico by instructing a surrogate dowser over the telephone, and wrote that dowsing could lead ultimately to "co-creation with nature”. Bill Lewis of Wales had an awesome talent for finding objects in all parts of the world without leaving his home, and Roger Brown from Australia accurately recorded complex manifestations of earth energy field changes for a hundred-mile radius of Adelaide.

Russian specialists like Pluzhnikkov could pin-point mineral resources and archaeological remains, and paranormal expert Neklessa developed a unique combination of pairs of scientists and mystics working together using advanced dowsing techniques to investigate the reasons for the failure of historic civilisations.

Many ‘doodlebuggers' across the USA are fine-tuned to locate obscure oil deposits, while Elizabeth Sullivan of Wales is recognised by the authorities as an expert on the location of humans and animals by map dowsing.

Colin Bloy in Spain initiated a sophisticated form of the dowsing process in the delicate art of healing, additionally applying it to the energy centres or ‘haras' of towns and villages to improve the quality of life of people living there.

The list is endless and confirms a continuing global interest in the ancient art of dowsing.

Comments

The Geometry of Universe by David Brandon

Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:59:07 +0100

I believe all of the 'sacred' relationships I've been talking about also apply here [1] a website by Jonathon Barlow Gee that deals with squares. I am sure there is also a hyper point or a hyper sphere. Look at the animation showing a section of the hypercube as it's rotated in 4D time space. It starts off as a large inverted tetrahedron. It also finishes with a smaller upright tetrahedron.

This is only three of the six cubes that are rotating in space. There are three other cubes on an opposite corner of the hypercube that would create the opposite shapes. Thus we would have two opposite pointing tetrahedrons...reminiscent of the 3D Star of David or Ed Leedskalnin's Latvian Star.

Over time in 4D rotation, this larger 3D Star of David becomes a smaller 3D Star of David that has rotated 180 degrees at least in one axis and points in the opposite direction.

That link seems to directly apply to the mathematics that combines Buckminster Fuller's world with the world of T.C. Lethbridge, Stonehenge, Tibetan Levitation, and Ed Leedskalnin.

It ties into the 4th dimension...hypercubes, hyperspheres, phi spirals, pi spirals...and light. I suggest there is a hypersphere that interacts with the hypercube because of what I've seen in the aforementioned works.

Jonathon Barlow Gee's website answers that hunch by saying that the hypersphere is a torus. This ties in directly with Dan Winters Phi Spiral and 'flame in the tent'...therefore into Genesis. It always seems to go back to light...and breath...the breath of 'god'. [2] Here is the applicable part of the website:

"Now, I would like to take a moment to compare some self-evident facts that we can observe in nature. I am not going to claim to have invented any of these things, as I hear doing so results in bad karma.

It is a self-evident fact, for example, that the seven basic colours of the spectrum of light (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet in order) can be mapped onto the surface of a torus, or hypersphere, in only one way, such that each of the seven colours occupies the same area on the surface of the shape.

Now, once these colours have been mapped onto the surface of the torus, we see that the outline between each of the mapped areas forms a spiral that wraps around the surface of the hypersphere.

The spiral that outlines the seven colour spectrum is, and this also is a completely self-evident fact and was not 'invented' by any human hands, is a 'phi' spiral.

Now, this 'phi' spiral revolves around the circumference of the torus (clockwise or counter-clockwise) depending upon the rotation through the centre of the torus (outward from centre or inward toward centre, respectively) of the seven coloured areas mapped onto its surface.

In other words, the 'phi' spiral revolves around the circumference as a measurement of the surface of the torus. It measures the fourth-dimensionality of this shape by moving, that is, it changes over time, and is therefore, like the clock, a means of measuring the passage of the fourth dimension.

However, this measurement is only of the surface of the torus, measuring the revolution from the circumference (seen from above) to the centre. This is a measurement of area, that is, of the combined seven areas of the mapped colour spectrum."

Endnotes

[1] URL: http://www.benpadiah.com/basic_intro.html

[2] E-mail to Jonathon Barlow Gee on Thursday 10 February, 2011

My name is David Brandon and I found your webpage doing a Google Search for PHI and Torus. I was researching the idea of Dan Winters' and Stan Tenen's "flame in the tent". I wanted more idea of the actual mathematical formula that enables the phi spiral to relate to a torus. But the real reason I've been doing all of that is to reconcile mathematics of the Dowsing works of T.C. Lethbridge with the mathematics of Edward Leedskalnin and Buckminster Fuller. I was very impressed with your website...VERY impressed! I would like to take you up on your offer to send an e-book of any of your works...especially any of these involving the mathematics of creation, torus, phi, pi...or the hypercube.

But more importantly than this, I was wondering if you might help my friends and I work on this math since you seem much more comfortable with the complicated mathematics of 3D and 4D space time. I really like how you don't take ownership for kharmaic reasons...I tend that way myself...though I give credit to others when I learn through them. Here is a brief description so you can get an idea the task.

Tom Lethbridge's works can be found at one of my friend's sites here: At the top of this page is the downloadable pdf's of his works. If you go to the second to last of any of these pages, you will see Lethbridge's Pendulum Rate chart of some of all objects. He found there is a 40" Archimedes spiral that repeats every 40" from the center of an object. While holding a pendulum over an object and allowed to oscillate in 3D space and 4D time...the object will only oscillate until the length of the pendulum is proper rate for that object. For instance, a gold nugget would respond at 29" and so would any female species. A male and diamond are both 24". I've been working on the mathematics behind it here.

If you look at the above link and briefly peruse it, you will find a part where I possibly tie in the male and female pendulum rates to John Michell's Sacred Rod of Stonehenge of 41.70898 inches and Lethbridge's 40'" Archimedes spiral cycle. I also tied this in with the energy mass of an electron and PHI. This isn't necessarily important for you to digest unless you'd like to get into it. To put it in simple terms, I'm very intrigued by your statement: "This diagram depicts a large part of what I work with on a daily basis".

This very much intrigues me because it is very close if not exactly what I'm trying to find...a connection with the 3D Archimedes Spiral of Lethbridge with the 3D PHI spiral of Winter's Flame in the Tent. If we could succeed in this, it would be a huge step in understanding the ancient art of dowsing...and provide a much more mathematical and scientific bedrock for others to build upon in referring to this ancient art.

I personally have tried this long pendulum dowsing and know that it works for me as Lethbridge provides. If you are not interested, please respond anyway and simply say so. If this is the case, then please refer me to anyone else that you know might be interested in working with us. Thank you for your time in reading this long email...and thank you for sharing your great works online!

David Brandon
Naperville, Illinois, USA.

Comments

Dowsing & Brain Waves by David Brandon

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:56:00 +0100

© David Brandon 2011

I've still been working on the math dealing with Lethbridge and Leedskalnin at the same time. I came across this website, which has helped me jump up my game a notch.

I then recently came across this website, which helped me fill in some of the math and computation that I've been toying around with in my head...because I know nothing of sound, light, and music. This guy puts it all together.

On the first site, this page about the Universal Life Force got me wondering if there is a similar relationship between the four levels of conciousness and brainwaves and Lethbridge's 40" whorls.

I read the description of the 2nd whorl (Micro Level) about ESP and what you can do on this level and it very much reminded me of Lethbridge's comments about the same 2nd whorl.

This was a major break-through for me because it got me seeing how brainwaves can be related to dowsing. It is rather obvious to me now but I didn't think about it before. When we dowse we are using our minds and a piece of string of various lengths. That's it. So, it is most obvious that the invisible force we use to communicate with buried objects or hidden objects would be related to brain waves.

I then started realizing why I might be naturally gifted in dowsing more than others...because I'm most often in this type of thought rather than beta waves that most are engaged in. It's like I daydream a lot thinking about things such as this...even while others are concentrating all around me on their daily tasks. So, I thought it most likely that alpha brain waves are the main thing we're tapping into when we dowse.

I then had another very important memory...see page 27 on the Lethbridge Symposium [1], where I wrote about my experience dowsing on a golf course near my house and experimenting with a large willow tree. I found this is the easiest, strongest object that I've yet observed to tune into dowsing.

In this email I discovered that dowsing wasn't instantaneous, rather it was time-delayed. I would stand there holding my pendulum swinging back and forth with my hand down...then raise my hand pointed at the willow tree...and then start counting seconds until my pendulum started rotating in resonance with the tree.'

This memory and experience gave me the idea now that perhaps the little scientific experiment I performed last summer could give me some insight into the mathematics of the frequency, wavelength, and speed of whatever vehicle I was using in dowsing.

So I found that I was communicating with a willow tree 610 feet round trip from my location...and it took 21 seconds. I changed around the frequencies and the wavelengths...and not surprisingly found an interesting relationship to the 12th root of 2 which is 1.059 and the Schumann Resonance frequency of 7.83 hz.

In other words, if I was sending out an invisible broadcast from my brain as I dowsed, I would transmit and focus through my fingertip. I would send this dowsing broadcast at a frequency of 7.83 hz and wavelength of (6th root of 2) meters.

The time it would take to travel 610 feet would be 21.15 seconds. When the return broadcast returned in harmony or in sync or in resonance with the willow tree's alpha waves, my pendulum would start to move in circles rather than back and forth oscillation as before.

Now it may be that there is other brain waves with a different frequency involved and thus a different wavelength but it has to tie in with this. The only thing that could adjust is if we took into account a different transferring medium such as refraction...but this is even easy enough to include if we had to.

However, from Lethbridge's years of experience dowsing and his testament of experience, I rather doubt any refraction is involved here because he spoke about dowsing through stone walls the same as dowsing in air.

Now, this 12th root of 2 is also part of the equations that Nick Fiorenza used on his website in calculating the harmonic scales of alpha brain waves.

Remember that this 1.059 meters is also the yardstick used by the ancients to build Stonehenge. There are 15 of these in the radius of the Sarsen stone circle or 30 in the diameter and John Michell refers to this and I referred to it as a sacred rod.

An interesting note on Nick Fiorenza's website is that there is 40 octaves between visible light and sound. This is therefore a doubling 40 times or 2^40. Then between sound and alpha brain waves is another 6 octaves, thus 2^46 between brainwaves and visible light.

Because of all of the above reasons, I started once again wondering why the ancient builders would have made a radius of 15 of these 1.059 meter cycles. I mean, if my reasoning is sound so far and they somehow determined the length of the wavelength of the alpha brainwave involved in dowsing, then what is special about 15 of these cycles or 15.89 meters?

I realized that 15 or 16 meters is now in the spectrum area of Ham Radios. I then found what I've been looking for over a year now here in Wikipedia: 'Because the 15-meter wavelength is harmonically related to that of the 40-meter band, it is often possible to use an antenna designed for 40 meters on the 15-meter band, as well.'

Remember how I've been looking for this gem for so long when dealing with the design scheme of Stonehenge and how it relates to Lethbridge's rate chart?

I figured out and is evident in the Lethbridge Symposium that Lethbridge's Chart can be overlaid on the Sarsen stone circle of Stonehenge. But I couldn't figure out why it would be scaled by 15 times rather than wait for the 40 inch whorls of Lethbridge.

However, when I did this, I also realized that if you scaled Lethbridge's 40" chart 40 times it would equate to the Aubrey Circle and to the outer henge of Stonehenge. So, I knew by the clues of the ancients that there was some sort of a 15/40 magic relationship...and here it is!

End Notes

[1]'...I spent all day yesterday and today dowsing in a local park by my house. I've mainly been playing around with the male and female sex rates. I found that the strongest reaction I get is some huge willow trees by a golf course in the park. I may have found a relationship between the English foot and inch. I found that since my strongest source is the willow tree, when I start dowsing I can test my gear and skills by pointing at it. Yesterday I subconsciously noticed it but today I noticed it consciously...there is a delay when I point at the tree and when it starts to rotate the pendulum in my other hand. It seemed to me that the further away the target was, the longer the delay. It therefore seemed that my supposition that the ‘invisible force for want of a better word’ was instantaneous as gravity…was wrong. I had a 100 foot tape measure in my backpack and so I measured how far it was from where I was standing to the center of the tree and I performed three experiments all with the same results. I swung the pendulum slowly back and forth and then pointed my finger to the tree and counted 1/1000, 2/1000, and so on. All three times I got a result of about 21 seconds before the pendulum started to rotate in a counter clockwise direction. So if this invisible force travels from my finger to the invisible cone of energy of the tree and back, it travels 610 feet. It made the trip in 21 seconds...so I figure it travels at 29 feet per second roughly…about 20 miles per hour. Strangely enough, a willow tree is Female and the length of string of the pendulum is 29 inches. So, we might see a new relationship between the foot and inch.'

Comments

Practical Dowsing by David Brandon

Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:08:50 +0200

© David Brandon 2010

I learned a few major lessons today dowsing. Maybe others can benefit from these lessons too. [1]

A couple weeks ago I was dowsing for Mastadon Bones in a field with very tall weeds…taller than me…when my brass pendulum got caught on some weeds and flew off in a backward diagonal angle to my right side. Since that time I've gone back looking for the pendulum bob three times and cleared the weeds in a circular area roughly twelve feet in radius.

The loss of my brass bob happened to coincide with the arrival of my new hazel pendulum. So each time I was clearing back some more weeds I was thinking I should be testing my dowsing abilities by using a hazel pendulum to find a brass one. I figured it should be relatively straight forward, though I knew I would get devoured by mosquitoes. And I did…despite taking every precaution to avoid it.

I looked up brass on the internet and found that copper was a major component. On Lethbridge’s rates table the rate for copper is 32-inches. So I thought it would be easy. It wasn't. I was getting a hit on one azimuth that kept pulling me further and further away from where I thought I lost it. It was a very frustrating experience. However I’m not someone who gives up without a fight. Today I went for the fourth time with my mind made up. I was going to find it without a metal detector…even if I had to stay out there all night long.

I started with the rate at 32-inches with similar results as before. I then thought maybe the pendulum bob was made out of lead so I tried 22-inches. I figured maybe I was getting problems because lead is an interrupter. [2] I had no success with this pendulum length. I then realized that my pendulum couldn't have been an interrupter because it worked for me with rates. I then felt totally lost.

I thought perhaps I could go back to the Theosophical Society Bookstore where I bought the brass pendulum and test the rate of a similar one.

Then I had one last idea. I remembered that Lethbridge was adamant that any abstract thought had a rate too...like sound or love or hate.

I've experimented with this in the past with mixed results so I try to avoid it and stick to physical objects as much as possible. In this case, I was looking for a physical object but I didn't know the rate of the pendulum to find the object. So, I started at 40-inches and kept making the string shorter until it started to rotate at 30-inches. The whole time I was simply imagining the pendulum bob that I was looking for in my mind and wondering what its rate was.

When I got to 30-inches I was still dubious if I was at the right length but I didn't go any further and try other lengths. I simply started pointing my left forefinger in an arc slowly to see if I got any hits at this length. I did but not where I expected...it was only three feet from where I always lay my bag of tools when I looked in the past.

I wondered if I was somehow picking up something in my backpack at the 30-inch rate. So I moved all of the objects and I still got a positive hit. I had to cut some more weeds to try and see. I cut into the uncleared area about another two feet. I was scouring the ground all the time but still didn't see anything. A bright metal object should shine very bright so I couldn't imagine what the problem was. I started to wonder if I had any dowsing ability at all.

So with one last effort I took my foot and scraped along the top of the ground and piled up all the dirt and vegetation in a small pile. I started sifting through it with my hand and found my object instantly at the top of the pile. Needless to say I was very relieved and content. I had finally succeeded in finding my first object by dowsing.

In the process I had learned that if I want to find something and don't know the rate all I have to do is think of it and start at 40-inches and shorten the thread until it starts to rotate. Then I can use that rate to point my left forefinger until the pendulum starts to rotate again. The object should be in that direction. This opens up a whole new world of possibilities in looking for lost objects with a pendulum…for me at least.

One other thing that I first learned a couple weeks ago, but had reconfirmed today, is that when I'm dowsing and thoughts pop up in my head, they are not accidents because I'm more in tune when I'm dowsing…in a psychic zone of some sort. Here is an example of what I mean.

A couple weeks ago I had used Google Earth and a pendulum to try and determine spots to look for Mastadon Bones...my first attempt at map dowsing. I then went to the exact location on earth that I marked on the map and started marking out a boundary that I had created on Google Earth. As I was walking, I was moving the knee-high weeds to the side and I had this thought pop up in my head that I might find something on the ground.

I started feeling this sense of excitement that I was getting closer and I imagined finding Mastadon Bones just lying on the ground. I looked between my legs as I took a step and saw a dark object. My heart raced and I wondered if it really could be. I reached down between my legs, pushed the weeds to the side and found my hand was just six inches away from the head of a coiled snake that looked just like a rattle snake.

My heart just about jumped out of my chest at the thought that maybe I was accidentally tracking snakes that might have the same rate as Mastadon Bones. This possibility had never even occurred to me before. Luckily the snake looked more scared of me than I did of it...and besides I heard no rattle. I’ve come across many rattlesnakes prospecting out west in Utah and later I found out it was a fox snake…commonly mistaken for a timber rattlesnake and killed.

I then walked back through the weeds, amazed that I never thought of the possibility of accidentally tracking dangerous living things while trying to track extinct animal bones! I was really on the look-out for snakes by now and proceeded very carefully until I got to some cut grass and could start to breathe more easily once again.

I thought I was home free. But I then had another thought go through my head. I had better look closer. And just then I saw another little snake headed right for me on a crash course head on. I stopped the same instant the snake did. We stared at each other. He hissed at me. I pointed at him and to my amazement (with hindsight) had the presence of mind to get a pendulum rate for snake of 12-inches. Afterwards I figured it was a grass snake which is not poisonous. Maybe the rate for grass is 12-inches…and Lethbridge has shown in his beetle experiments that we are what we eat.

Anyway, this was the lesson I learned a couple weeks ago. Lethbridge in his writings mentioned some premonitions or visions that came in from the future as well as the past. He mentioned once that he won some money on the Grand National this way. Anyway today I experienced this for the first time. The last couple times I walked through this field I had come across this manhole cover and always got this distinct impression to look out for a snake. It seemed a very odd thought but I made a mental note of it...and never saw anything.

Today when I passed the spot I had the same thought but walked through quickly without even looking for the snake thinking that I must have been wrong as I had passed the spot at least ten times and never seen a snake. But on the way back after finding my pendulum bob, I had the distinct thought again cross my mind - ‘snake’.

I could just make out the manhole cover and readied my hand-axe just in case my premonition was correct. Three seconds after doing this I saw the large black tail of a snake with a white stripe on its back slithering quickly on the path away from me as fast as it could move.

I was amazed at how in tune I was to a living object that I consciously did not hear or see any sign of. I also thought back at the premonitions I felt every time I crossed that same spot about a snake and never saw any sign of one...until today.

Lethbridge wrote about several examples like this that he experienced in his own life. We probably all do.

Endnotes

[1] Written for The Lethbridge Symposium.
[2] See Interrupters & Reversers by Tom Lethbridge.

Comments

Brave New Universe by Brian Greene

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:59:17 +0200

© Brian R. Greene 2004 [1]

In 1919, Einstein received a paper that could easily have been dismissed as the ravings of a crank. It was written by a little-known German mathematician named Theodor Kaluza, and in a few brief pages it laid out an approach for unifying the two forces known at the time, gravity and electromagnetism.

To achieve this goal, Kaluza proposed a radical departure from something so basic, so completely taken for granted, that it seemed beyond questioning. He proposed that the universe does not have three space dimensions. Instead, Kaluza asked Einstein and the rest of the physics community to entertain the possibility that the universe has four space dimensions so that, together with time, it has a total of five space-time dimensions.

Kaluza proposed that in addition to left/right, back/forth, and up/down, the universe actually has one more spatial dimension that, for some reason, no one has ever seen. If correct, this would mean that there is another independent direction in which things can move, and therefore that we need to give four pieces of information to specify a precise location in space, and a total of five pieces of information if we also specify a time.

Kaluza realized that the equations of Einstein’s general theory of relativity could fairly easily be extended mathematically to a universe that had one more space dimension. Kaluza undertook this extension and found, naturally enough, that the higher-dimensional version of general relativity not only included Einstein’s original gravity equation but, because of the extra space dimension, also had extra equations.

When Kaluza studied these extra equations, he discovered something extraordinary: the extra equations were none other than the equations Maxwell had discovered in the nineteenth century for describing the electromagnetic field! By imagining a universe with one new space dimension, Kaluza had proposed a solution to what Einstein viewed as one of the most important problems in all physics. Kaluza had found a framework that combined Einstein’s original equations of general relativity with those of Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism.

Then, in 1926, the Swedish physicist Oskar Klein injected a new twist into Kaluza’s idea, one that suggested where the extra dimension might be hiding. Klein’s contribution was to suggest that what’s true for an object within the universe might be true for the fabric of the universe itself. Namely, just as the tightrope’s surface has both large and small dimensions, so does the fabric of space.

Maybe the three dimensions we all know about - left/right, back/forth, and up/down - are like the horizontal extent of the tightrope, dimensions of the big, easy-to-see variety. But just as the surface of the tightrope has an additional, small, curled-up, circular dimension, maybe the fabric of space also has a small, curled-up, circular dimension, one so small that no one has powerful enough magnifying equipment to reveal its existence. Because of its tiny size, Klein argued, the dimension would be hidden.

With this modification to Kaluza’s original idea, Klein provided an answer to how the universe might have more than the three dimensions of common experience that could remain hidden, a framework that has since become known as Kaluza-Klein theory. And since an extra dimension of space was all Kaluza needed to merge general relativity and electromagnetism, Kaluza-Klein theory would seem to be just what Einstein was looking for.

Indeed Einstein and many others became quite excited about unification through a new, hidden space dimension, and a vigorous effort was launched to see whether this approach would work in complete detail. Einstein continued to dabble in the Kaluza-Klein theory until at least the early 1940s. But the theory encountered difficulties in trying to describe the microworld, and in particular the incorporation of the electron into the extra-dimensional picture.

There was another reason scientists were hesitant about the approach. Many found it both arbitrary and extravagant to postulate a hidden spatial dimension. If you asked Kaluza and Klein why the universe had five spacetime dimensions rather than four, or six, or seven, or 7,000 for that matter, they wouldn’t have had an answer much more convincing than “Why not?”

More than three decades later, the situation changed radically with the advent of string theory, [2] the first approach to merge general relativity and quantum mechanics, with the potential to unify our understanding of all forces and all matter. But the quantum mechanical equations of string theory don’t work in four spacetime dimensions, nor in five, six or seven, or 7000. Instead, the equations of string theory work only in ten spacetime dimensions - nine of space, plus time. String theory demands more dimensions.

Prior to string theory, no theory said anything at all about the number of spatial dimensions in the universe. Every theory from Newton to Maxwell to Einstein assumed that the universe had three space dimensions, much as we all assume the sun will rise tomorrow. Kaluza and Klein proffered a challenge by suggesting that there were four space dimensions, but this amounted to yet another assumption - a different assumption, but an assumption nonetheless.

Now, for the first time, string theory provided equations that predicted the number of space dimensions. A calculation - not an assumption, not a hypothesis, not an inspired guess - determines the number of space dimensions according to string theory, and the surprising thing is that the calculated number is not three but nine. String theory leads us, inevitably, to a universe with six extra space dimensions and hence provides a compelling, ready-made context for invoking the ideas of Kaluza and Klein. Their original proposal assumed only one hidden dimension, but it’s easily generalized to two, three, or even six extra dimensions required by string theory.

However, there’s an awkward detail regarding string theory. Over the last three decades, not one but five distinct versions of string theory have been developed. While their names are not of the essence, they are called Type 1, Type IIA, Type IIB, Heterotic-O, and Heterotic-E, and they all share the same essential features; the basic ingredients are strands of vibrating energy - and as calculations in the 1970s and 1980s revealed, each theory requires six extra space dimensions; but when they are analyzed in detail, significant differences appear.

During the late 1980s and early 1990s, with many physicists hotly pursuing an understanding of one or another of the string theories, the enigma of the five versions was not a problem researchers typically dealt with on a day-to-day basis. Instead, it was one of those quiet questions that everyone assumed would be addressed in the distant future, when the understanding of each individual string theory had become significantly more refined.

But in the summer of 1995, with little warning, these modest hopes were wildly exceeded when Edward Witten - who for two decades has been the world’s most renowned string theorist - uncovered a hidden unity that tied all five string theories together. Witten showed that rather than being distinct, the five theories are actually just five different ways of mathematically analyzing a single theory. The unifying master theory has tentatively been called M-theory.

Witten’s work revealed that the approximate string theory equations, used in the 1970s and 1980s to conclude that the universe must have nine space dimensions, missed the true number by one. The exact answer, his analysis showed, is that the universe according to M-theory has ten space dimensions, that is eleven spacetime dimensions. [3]

Much as Kaluza found that a universe with five spacetime dimensions provided a framework for unifying electromagnetism and gravity, and much as string theorists found that a universe with ten spacetime dimensions provided a framework for unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity, Witten found that a universe with eleven spacetime dimensions provided a framework for unifying all string theories.

Following Witten’s paper, the avalanche of subsequent results led to the realization that string theory, and the M-theoretic framework to which it now belongs, contains ingredients besides strings. The analyses showed that there are two-dimensional objects called, naturally enough, membranes or - in deference to systematically naming their higher-dimensional cousins - two-branes.

There are objects with three spatial dimensions called three-branes. And, although increasingly difficult to visualize, the analyses showed that there are also objects with p spatial dimensions, where p can be any whole number less than 10, known - with no derogation intended - as p-branes. Thus strings are but one ingredient in string theory, not the ingredient.

This raises an intriguing possibility. Might we, right now, be living within a three-brane? Like Snow White, whose world exists within a two-dimensional movie screen - a two-brane - that itself resides within a higher-dimensional universe (the three space dimensions of the movie theatre), might everything we know exist within a three- dimensional screen - a three-brane - that itself resides within the higher-dimensional universe of string/M-theory?

Could it be that what Newton, Leibniz, Mach, and Einstein called three-dimensional space is actually a particular three-dimensional entity in string/M-theory? Or, in a more relativistic language, could it be that the four-dimensional spacetime developed by Minkowski and Einstein is actually the wake of a three-brane as it evolves through time? In short might the universe as we know it be a brane? The possibility that we are living within a three-brane - the so-called braneworld scenario - is the latest twist in string/M-theory’s story.

If we are living within a three-brane - if our four-dimensional spacetime is nothing but the history swept out by a three-brane through time - then the venerable question of whether spacetime is a something would be cast in a brilliant new light. Familiar four-dimensional spacetime would arise from a real physical entity in string/M-theory, a three-brane, not from some vague or abstract idea.

In this approach, the reality of our four-dimensional spacetime would be on a par with the reality of an electron or a quark. [4] But if the universe we’re aware of really is a three-bane, wouldn’t even a casual glance reveal that we are immersed within something - within the three-brane interior?

Well, we’ve already learned of things within which modern physics suggest we may be immersed - a Higgs ocean; space filled with dark energy; myriad quantum field fluctuations - none of which make themselves directly apparent to unaided perceptions. So it shouldn’t be a shock to learn that string/M-theory adds another candidate to the list of invisible things that may fill ‘empty’ space. But let’s not get cavalier.

For each of the previous possibilities, we understand its impact on physics and how we might establish that it truly exists. Indeed, for two of the three - dark energy and quantum fluctuations - we’ve seen that strong evidence supporting their existence has already been gathered; and evidence for the Higgs field is being sought at current and future accelerators. So what is the corresponding situation for life within a three-brane? If the brane-world scenario is correct, why don’t we see the three-brane, and how would we establish that it exists?

The answer highlights how the physical implications of string/M-theory in the braneworld context differ radically from the earlier ‘branefree’ (or, as they’re sometimes affectionately called ‘no-braner’) scenarios. Consider, as an important example, the motion of light - the motion of photons. In string theory, a photon is a particular string vibrational pattern. More specifically, mathematical studies have shown that in the braneworld scenario, only open string vibrations, not closed ones, produce photons, and this makes a big difference.

Open string end-points are constrained to move within the three-brane, but are otherwise completely free. This implies that photons (open strings executing the photon mode of vibration) would travel without any constraint or obstruction throughout our three-brane. And that would make the brane appear completely transparent - completely invisible - thus preventing us from seeing that we are immersed within it.

That’s an intense realization with important consequences. Earlier, we required the extra dimensions of string/M-theory to be tightly curled up. The reason, clearly, is that we don’t see the extra dimensions and so they must be hidden away. And one way to hide them is to make them smaller than we or our equipment can detect.

But let’s now examine the issue in the braneworld scenario. How do we detect things? Well, when we use our eyes, we use the electromagnetic force; when we use powerful instruments like electron microscopes, we also use the electromagnetic force; when we use atom smashers, one of the forces we use to probe the ultrasmall is, once again, the electromagnetic force.

But if the electromagnetic force is confined to our three-brane, our three space dimensions, it is unable to probe the extra dimensions, regardless of their size. Photons cannot escape our dimensions, enter the extra dimensions, and then travel back to our eyes or equipment allowing us to detect the extra dimensions, even if they were as large as the familiar space dimensions.

So, if we live in a three-bane, there is an alternative explanation for why we’re not aware of the extra dimensions. It is not necessarily that the extra dimensions are extremely small. They could be big. We don’t see them because of the way we see. We see by using the electromagnetic force, which is unable to access any dimensions beyond the three we know about. Like an ant walking along a lily pad, completely unaware of the deep waters lying just beneath the visible surface, we could be floating within a grand, expansive, higher-dimensional space, but the electromagnetic force - eternally trapped within our dimensions - would be unable to reveal this.

Okay, you might say. But the electromagnetic force is only one of nature’s four forces. What about the other three? Can they probe into the extra dimensions, thus enabling us to reveal their existence? For the strong and the weak nuclear forces, the answer is, again, no. In the braneworld scenario, calculations show that the messenger particles for these forces - gluons and W and Z particles - also arise from open-string vibrational patterns, so they are just as trapped as photons, and processes involving the strong and weak nuclear forces are just as blind to the extra dimensions.

The same goes for particles of matter. Electrons, quarks, and all the other particle species also arise from the vibrations of open strings with trapped endpoints. Thus, in the braneworld scenario, you and I and everything we’ve ever seen are permanently imprisoned within our three-brane. Taking account of time, everything is trapped within our four-dimensional slice of spacetime.

Well, almost everything. For the force of gravity, the situation is different. Mathematical analyses of the braneworld scenario have shown that gravitons arise from the vibrational pattern of closed strings, much as they do in the previously discussed no-braner scenario. And closed strings - strings with no endpoints - are not trapped by branes. They are as free to leave a brane as they are to roam on through it.

So, if we were living in a brane, we would not be completely cut off from the extra dimensions. Through the gravitational force, we could both influence and be influenced by the extra dimensions. Gravity, in such a scenario, would provide our sole means for interacting beyond our three space dimensions.

How big could the extra dimensions be before we’d become aware of them through the gravitational force? Hundreds of years of experiments have confirmed that gravity varies inversely with the square of distance, giving strong evidence that there are three space dimensions. But as of 1998, no experiment had ever probed gravity’s strength on separations smaller than a millimetre.

This led to the proposal that in the braneworld scenario extra dimensions could be as large as a millimetre and would still have been undetected. This radical suggestion inspired a number of experimental groups to initiate a study of gravity at submillimeter distance in hopes of finding violations of the inverse square law; so far, none have been found, down to a tenth of a millimetre. Thus, even with today’s state-or-the-art gravity experiments, if we are living within a three-brane, the extra dimensions could be as large as a tenth of a millimetre, and yet we wouldn’t know it.

This is one of the most striking realizations of the last decade. Using the three nongravitational forces, we can probe down to about a billionth of a billionth (10^-18) of a metre, and no one has found any evidence of extra dimensions. [5]

But in the braneworld scenario, the nongravitational forces are impotent in searching for extra dimensions since they are trapped on the brane itself. Only gravity can give insight into the nature of the extra dimensions, and, as of today, the extra dimensions could be as thick as a human hair and yet they’d be completely invisible to our most sophisticated instruments.

Right now, right next to you, right next to me, and right next to everyone else, there could be another spatial dimension - a dimension beyond left/right, back/forth, and up/down, a dimension that’s curled up but still large enough to swallow something as thick as this page - that remains beyond our grasp [6]

Over the last century, [7] we’ve become intimately acquainted with some previously hidden features of space and time through Einstein’s two theories of relativity and through quantum mechanics. The slowing of time, the relativity of simultaneity, alternative slicings of spacetime, gravity as the warping and curving of space and time, the probabilistic nature of reality, and long-range quantum entanglement were not on the list of things that even the best of the world’s nineteenth century physicists would have expected to find just around the corner. And yet there they were, as attested to by both experimental results and theoretical explanations.

In our age, we’ve come upon our own panoply of unexpected ideas. Dark matter and dark energy that appear to be, far and away, the dominant constituents of the universe. Gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of spacetime - which were predicted by Einstein’s relativity and may one day allow us to peek further back in time than ever before. A Higgs ocean, which permeates all of space and which, if confirmed, will help us to understand how particles acquire mass. Inflationary expansion, which may explain the shape of the cosmos, resolve the puzzle of why it’s so uniform on large scales, and set the direction to time’s arrow.

String theory, which posits loops and snippets of energy in place of point particles and promises a bold version of Einstein’s dream in which all particles and all forces are combined into a single theory. Extra space dimensions emerging from the mathematics of string theory, and possibly detectable in accelerator experiments during the next decade. A braneworld, in which our three space dimensions may be but one universe among many, floating in a higher-dimensional spacetime. And perhaps even emergent spacetime, in which the very fabric of space and time is composed of more fundamental spaceless and timeless entities.

During the next decade, even more powerful accelerators will provide much needed experimental input, and many physicists are confident that data gathered from the highly energetic collisions that are planned will confirm a number of these pivotal theoretical constructs. I share this enthusiasm and eagerly await the results.

Until our theories make contact with observable, testable phenomena, they remain in limbo - they remain promising collections of ideas that may or may not have relevance for the real world. The new accelerators will advance the overlap between theory and experiment substantially, and, we physicists hope, will usher many of these ideas into the realm of established science.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapters 12 & 13 in The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene. The published text, from page 360 to 400 in the Penguin 2007 edition, has been compressed by four-fifths to give a flavour of how our everyday ‘three space and one time dimension’ reality is being extended at the leading edge of theoretical physics as new facts about this reality emerge. [Ed]

[2] A string is a one-dimensional vibrating filament of energy, superseding atoms and particles as the smallest unit from which protons, quarks etc. are constituted. Superstring theory incorporates these vibrating strings as one dimensional loops (closed strings) or snippets (open strings) to unite general relativity, quantum mechanics and supersymmetry. [Ed]

[3] Lethbridge was very specific that ‘length’ has a rate of 13⅓-inches and ‘thickness’ a rate of 26⅔. A further 13⅓ would give a rate of 40-inches. Might this be the third space dimension? Lethbridge would have been aware of the significance of this possibility (hence the precision of the thirds), but I am not aware of any mention of this in his published books. Three whorls would be required to give the nine space dimensions of string theory, while a fourth would be needed to accommodate the needs of string/M-theory’s ten space dimensions. Perhaps somebody in London’s Docklands might care to experiment with left/right, back/forth and in/out in one of the atriums in the City of London’s Financial District?[Ed]

[4] You could still ask whether the larger spacetime within which strings and branes exist - the eleven dimensions of string/M-theory - is itself an entity; the reality of the spacetime arena we directly experience, though, would be rendered obvious.

[5] The strings (of string theory) are so small that a direct observation would be tantamount to reading the text on this page from a distance of 100 light years: it would require resolving power nearly a billion billion times finer than our current technology allows.’ Brian Greene in The Fabric of the Cosmos (page 352). [Ed]

[6] There is even a suggestion that gravity itself can be trapped, not by a sticky brane, but by extra dimensions that curve in just the right way, relaxing even further the constraints on their size.

[7] The last five paragraphs have been taken from the final chapter of The Fabric of the Cosmos (page 492 in the Penguin 2007 edition). [Ed]

Comments

The War in Heaven by Tom Lethbridge

Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:00:46 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1972 [1]

I said before that this investigation was likely to get like a science fiction novel and this is what is happening. We may not be getting satisfactory evidence for flying saucers at an early time, but may we perhaps be getting suggestions that vehicles, resembling more efficient rocket capsules, may have been circling Earth a long time ago and looking for places to land? Is it not possible that the war in heaven may have been a fight between two planets as to which of them should colonize the Earth?

Let us, for our amusement, and not with any sense of conviction, try to draw a picture. A very long time ago, somewhere about 2500 BC perhaps, there were two planets in the solar system rather more advanced technologically than Earth is today. One was Mars, the other perhaps Venus. They communicated with each other yet suffered from the human failing of jealousy.

Mars, let us suppose, set up bases inside the crust of the moon, and began to dispatch rockets carrying partiers of explorers and prospectors to earth. It was during this period of exploration that the primitive Neolithic natives of the earth were persuaded to set up rings of stones and timber circles to act as guiding beacons for the use of incoming spacecraft. All round western Europe from Sardinia to Scandinavia teams were at work and beacons were set up. Perhaps farther east other ways of directing air traffic were devised.

For a relatively short time this reasonably happy state of affairs continued and then the jealousy of the other planet flared up into open war. Probably it also claimed earth as its private possession.

The first campaign in the war centred on the Martian moon base, then there was a slogging match between the two planets themselves. As a result of this, Mars was knocked out and the other planet so badly disabled that it has as yet been unable to take advantage of its victory.

But the interest of all this is in what happened to the exploring parties marooned on Earth by the destruction of the bases on the moon. [2] There was little they could do and after a very short time the Martians had to go native. In the hope, however, that relief expeditions would eventually be sent to fetch them home, they persuaded the real natives to keep up their dances at the stone circles and so on as a religious rite pleasing to the Great Ones in the sky , who had sent them down to live among them and bring them marvellous benefits.

This is a fairy story. I have made it up. But it is curious how it might be true. So much that happened in later history seems to add to the possibility. Let us see what might have happened to the Martians. Remembering that I have been on three Arctic expeditions myself, it is possible that I might have some idea how it all might develop. [3 We will continue our fairy story with some groups of isolated men and perhaps women too, dotted about on the surface of an undeveloped and foreign planet with little hope of ever returning home again; being shipwrecked on a desert island would be far less drastic.

These stranded astronauts would all be specialists in some way or another. If we may judge from modern trends in education, they might be deplorably lacking in simple general knowledge; but some of them must surely have known something about growing things in gardens. This was to be vital in their predicament and may well explain why such and such god is responsible in tradition for teaching a particular people agriculture. Botanists among them would recognize what plants might possibly provide them with grain and would institute an immediate search in the particular part of the world in which they had been stranded. A little was probably known by the natives already.

Much the same thing was likely to happen in the case of metals. There would be men among them skilled in the identification of metallic ores; but there was no fuel to pro vide great heat for smelting. Metal for tools was an urgent necessity and copper was available in many localities. Thus such and such a god became the Smith of the Gods, by teaching the natives how to make simple cupellation hearths. It is interesting to remember in this connection that the earliest metal tools were made of pure copper and only later was tin added to it to make the more satisfactory bronze.

The earliest copper axes and knives found by archaeologists remind me of my childhood’s efforts and are the kind of things which might have been produced by men who knew that copper could be melted from its ores and made into tools, but did not know the technique and had to build it up from their own imagination.

It is hard to see otherwise how metalworking could have been invented by chance. It is perhaps easier to think that some unknown ‘God’ appeared from the sky and taught men how to do it. Easier perhaps, but not very much easier, for you are only pushing it further back on to another world in another age.

There was very little else they could do to better their situation. All the mechanical civilization in which they had been brought up vanished with the failure of their fuel supplies. It was useless to try to build a boat, as many men have done on the loss of their ship, to take them home again, for their home was far away across the heavens and only a relief expedition could take them back.

But to the natives, to whom they had miraculously appeared from the sky, they were still wonderful. For a while they may well have retained some ammunition for firearms of some kind and from this the stories of the power of the gods to strike a man dead in an instant could well have arisen. So too could the idea of Zeus’ thunderbolts have originated in some kind of hand grenade.

As time went on in their isolation from normal life, ‘the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose’. Isn’t this exactly what was bound to happen? In our story too, we must assume that this took place not at the base of one lost expedition, but at several. The exploration parties were often cut off from one another by hundreds or thousands of miles of sea or impassable forest. The world they had come to was young, with none of the roads, towns or vehicles of civilization. Of necessity they must have taken to the sea, in the hope of joining up with others of their kind.

Thus, we may think, there slowly arose on earth little tribes of hybrids with a greater knowledge than others in the world at the time. Unlike the rest, they knew how to provide a subsistence from agriculture, they knew how to make metal tools and they learnt how to use the sea.

But the leaders in each group proudly claimed descent from their forefathers, who had come from the sky. Although this blood was slowly diluted by admixture from the natives; yet when possible they intermarried with those of their own kind and, throughout the old world at any rate, they became the ruling caste.

How much was handed down by word of mouth of the remembered lore of the lost planet is anybody’s guess. Scraps of the knowledge of how to handle bio-electronic power apparently spread to every corner of the globe and large sections of more detailed information remained in such doctrines as that of the Kahuna people in the Pacific.

The most colourful traditional picture of all this fairy tale is undoubtedly that which survives from ancient Greece. Here the myths and legends are just the kind of thing which one might have expected to be found circulating hundreds of years after the astonishing and little-understood happenings.

But, even in the old Celtic tradition, there seems to be traces of similar ideas. There we find cauldrons which revive dead men, magic spears, inexhaustible sources of food and suchlike things which, although clearly imaginary in their context, might yet be reflections of older events of a more concrete nature. Right down to the Viking age, men still wore coats in battle on which swords would not bite and carried unbeatable weapons.

Somehow it all seems too much for the imagination of the early Semitic, Indian and Greek peoples. We know the kind of thing which is imagined by the so-called primitive folk: ‘You must not swim in the sea, or a little worm will swim up inside you and you will have a baby.’

Of course you would not get anything quite so simple from people who watched and hunted wild beasts for their food, or kept them in domesticity for the same purpose. Yet even the hunters on the hill, however much they watch the soaring of the great birds of prey, would surely not have imagined easily gods who flew about the heavens and resembled them so closely; while the agriculturalists hardly bothered with the sky at all, except to watch for signs of coming wind or rain.

But if anything remotely like our fairy story should ever have happened, it appears to have been a mixed blessing. Did we not guess that the strangers came from Mars and was not Mars the planet of war? Why was it thought to be so, unless there was some vague tradition at the back of the idea?

With the coming of metal, not only were improved tools for peaceful uses made available, but the weapons of war were rendered far more efficient. ‘I beheld Satan as lightning fallen from heaven.’ War between group and group and tribe and tribe became endemic. The greed which had wrecked the original planets seemed to have come down to earth.

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Legend of the Sons of God. A Fantasy? By T.C. Lethbridge; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1972, ISBN 2-283-98128-8.
[2] NASA explorations of our solar system provide little support for Lethbridge’s War of the Planets and it seems unlikely that he would have chosen this particular scenario were he writing today. But Lethbridge believed there was evidence of a war in heaven and would have remained intrigued about what form this might have taken. However there are other matters Lethbridge raises with his fairy story. Lethbridge had a life-long interest in the dispersal theories of his generation of archaeologists. Mark Twain’s Connecticut Yankee in the Court of King Arthur is relevant in this regard, as are the voyages of Thor Heyerdahl. [Ed]
[3] Lethbridge had a close call on one of his Artic expeditions. For a few hours the expedition was convinced that their ship would be crushed by the ice. Maurice Cotterell has developed similar ideas about the fate of stranded ‘visitors’ from a higher culture based on the supposition that Atlantis did indeed exist and was destroyed suddenly in the manner reported by Solon and Plato. See Chapter 10 on The Atlantean Cataclysm in The Mayan Prophecies; Element Books, 1995, ISBN 1-85230-888-5. [Ed]

Comments

Megaliths by Tom Lethbridge

Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:53:56 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1972 [1]

The standing stones of Callanish are in their way quite as remarkable as those of Stonehenge, for they form a strange pattern. In the middle is a single pillar fifteen feet high with a small and, probably later, rifled megalithic tomb at its foot. The central pillar forms the hub of a circle of stones enclosing an area thirty-seven feet across, or about the size of a tennis court. From this radiate one double and three single lines of uprights. They nearly form a cross, but do not quite do so. It is a strange and rather uncanny place to see in the usual pouring rain as it stands on a low hill. The double avenue heads almost true north for nearly a hundred yards.

Loch Roag is divided into two by the island of Bernara, which fits into it rather like a biscuit stuck in a dog’s mouth. On the shore of Bernara facing Callanish are two more standing stones, looking as if they once marked a path across to the island where now is sea. It was probably dry land when the stones were put up, for fresh water Bronze Age peats can be seen round the shore today for several feet below high tide mark.

Archaeologists as a whole pay little attention to Callanish. It does not appear strange to them that such a remarkable construction should be found in such a remote setting. If it had been in Kent or Gloucestershire it would be thronged, but in the Outer Islands nobody cares. Yet it is the very situation of the thing which is so strange.

It stands far out on the rim of the western ocean and there seems to be no possibility that there can ever have been a large population out there. Why should there be? The land must at the best of times have always been very poor. The Ring of Stennis in Orkney is not so strange, for the Orkneys are not so bleak as this stretch of the Long Island.

Not long ago it was suggested that Callanish was raised as a kind of substation of Stonehenge and both were intended as observatories to plot lunar eclipses. Even if this idea were correct, it implies a great organization far away who could journey to the distant north and either bring their labour with them or collect enough local men to do the work. I do not feel that it makes sense. Neither do I see how any great religious idea could have been called into play. Why put it there? There must have been more populous areas elsewhere, where such things could have been needed.

However, suppose that some survey party had been dropped off out there to look for minerals or any other purpose, it might have been necessary to construct a landing mark of identifiable shape so that supplies could be dropped, or the explorers could be picked up when their time was up.

Callanish in Lewis and Stennis in Orkney, could they not have been the identification signals set up by two exploration parties to draw attention to themselves so that there would be no doubt where their bases were situated? All this would be hundreds of years before another station, the bluestone ring, was transported to Stonehenge.

If this possibly absurd suggestion has any foundation in fact, was it all in vain? Were none of these stations ever collected again because something happened to their home planet? Did these pioneers work their way back to more developed lands and there, by their superior technical knowledge, become for a time sons of God? Did they naturally become kings and rulers and try to keep their stock reasonably distinct for thousands of years, until philosophers formulated the idea that all men were equal?

Probably we will never know the answer, but it is possible to ask the question now; first because men are beginning to make exploratory expeditions to worlds themselves and second because a very great quantity of information is being published suggesting that unknown flying machines may be coming from outside to examine our own planet. As I said before, I have had no experience of this, yet I find the mass of observed facts need an explanation.

There seems to be a considerable difference between the monuments on the outlying islands and peninsulas and others far inland. They may represent successive stages in some form of exploratory development. If I am right in identifying Tipperary as the original site of the Stonehenge bluestones, its situation is not unlike that of Stonehenge, being convenient to river systems and old trackway routes along both of which native labour could be called in to help.

Another famous circle, Avebury, could have been the original central point in the south of Britain before Stonehenge was thought of. If we are trying to plot the possible plan of exploration, then Avebury would come high on the list. But Avebury was less convenient by water though better situated for movements by land.

Of course the most dramatic of all these constructions in the west, for the later Stonehenge is in a different category, is Carnac on Quiberon Bay in Brittany. Here the remains of eleven long avenues of standing stones still survive, with parts of a great stone circle largely ruined by recent houses.

The stone avenues apparently once extended for several miles and over a thousand stones still remain in place. If there was a central base where power was generated to operate bio-electronic beacons, this would have been the place. Although much further south, it stands in a somewhat similar position to Callanish, with a drowned land surface beneath the sea in front of it.

The purpose of these great stone avenues is completely unknown.[2] There are many burial mounds associated with them as there are around Stonehenge; but that does not say that the rows had anything to do with burial. If there was any religious purpose in their construction, surely it implies a population much more of the order of that today than one of scattered and primitive farmers? One would have thought that the whole population of Brittany in those days would not have provided a fitting congregation.

We will leave Carnac for the moment and return to Britain. I have already mentioned the stone rows on Dartmoor. Of course these are in no way comparable to the massed avenues at Carnac, but they are reasonably impressive and there are quite a number of them dotted about the moor. I have taken the approximate bearings of eight of them and projected these lines to see what happens.

It was obvious at once that the one at Black Tor when projected cuts another row at Warren House, in an area seamed and scarred with very ancient tin workings. It may be a coincidence, but these two lines could have given you a cross-bearing on rich deposits of tin, long before maps are supposed to have existed.

In any case how did anybody know that there was tin in Britain without long and elaborate prospecting? I have never liked theories based on ideas of projected lines, but it is curious nevertheless. If there is anything at all in the beacon idea, this gives it some confirmation.

The two rows mentioned are not the only suggestive ones. That at Sharp Tor when produced runs very close to Avebury itself. Those at Fernworthy, Chagford and Higher White Tor hit the great monolith on the summit of Exmoor near The Chains.

None of this is quite exact according to modern measurements, but if you were making observations in an unknown and unmapped land, they would be remarkably good. It may all be nonsense, or it may not. But if it is nonsense something will turn up to show that it is.

It has been hinted that Carnac might be the most important place in the whole system. If so, and if there is anything in the idea at all, one at least of the stone rows on Dartmoor should give an approximate bearing on Carnac. Actually three do, the double row on Headland Warren and the single ones at Dartmeet and Butterdon.

I do not even suggest that this idea of bio-electronic beacons is the right answer. All I am trying to demonstrate here is that there is something here which could possibly fit into a picture of ancient exploration which we know nothing about.

However, to return to the spread of the remnants of bio-electronic knowledge, let us look at some of the traditions still handed on. The islanders of Easter Island believe that the great stone statues there were set up by the ‘mana’, that is the extra-sensory power of the king, who was especially trained to develop it.

This takes us at once to the world wide belief that such power was available and could be used. If such power can be utilised, surely that is how Stonehenge and other monuments must have been moved and erected? Merlin is said to have done it by marvellous power.

Is this very different, except in degree, to the almost universal stone-throwing trick of the poltergeist, which is frequently reported from all over the old world and the new? A poltergeist is apparently the involuntary mental movement of solid objects by what is now known as telekinesis. If the mind of a somewhat mentally retarded girl can somehow produce numerous wet pebbles from the bed of a stream and throw them about in a house, what could have been done by a mind specially trained to use this power?

What is known about telekinesis, if we must use this depressing technical term? It is probably much more common than most people suppose and frequently passes unnoticed. It may even take place at times in every family and simply be unrecognized as such, for the bulk of modern town-dwelling humanity is deeply unobservant.

How many people have not had the experience of a letter vanishing completely? Of course they usually put this down to carelessness on somebody’s part, or forgetfulness, or something of that kind. But very often there is no reason to suppose that this is the right answer. Yet it is usually so small a matter that it is passed over as an accident. It is only when poltergeist activity becomes really violent that anybody takes any notice of it and even then they often try to explain it by trickery. It was not so in earlier times. Everything out of the ordinary was carefully noticed.

But are we talking nonsense? Is there any such thing as mana? I must say that I existed for quite a long time with a complete disbelief in such a force; now I am not quite so sure. I rather wonder whether civilized man has not just forgotten how to use it through being so pleased with his other attainments. Even today people still say ‘thought is power’, although I doubt if many of them know what they mean by this remark.

Now it is possible to demonstrate that there is something in the theory of mana. We have, as I describer earlier, done repeatable experiments with pebbles picked off the beach at Seaton and tested them with a pendulum. If the pebbles are picked up with a pair of tongs and then tested one by one, they only react to their chemical composition.

But if I take one out and throw it against a wall, then it will respond to the 24-inch male rate. If my wife does the same, the answer is 29-inches for the female. This can be repeated as long as you can be bothered to do it. It is a scientific test, in that it is repeatable, and it shows that some unknown property of the man or woman passes from him or her to the stone. This makes the existence of mana a little less absurd.

The thing which surprised me most was that mana is extremely long lasting. I found the dates for the sling stones from the camps to be all around 320 BC. Was it then mana which gave the effect of an electric shock when my wife and I tested the stones of the Merry Maidens stone circle in Cornwall? It seems that it must have been. If so mana is apparently a bio-electronic force and it should be possible to learn a lot about it.

These experiments with pebbles differ from poltergeist phenomena in one important matter. The poltergeist operator does it involuntarily and probably has no idea that he or she is doing it. Our experiments were deliberate. We were trying to see whether we could put anything into the electromagnetic fields of the stones which could be detected. Call the anything mana if you like; whatever name is given to it, it appears to exist.

Now, if by using trivial objects such as pebbles off the beach you can show that it is possible to alter their electromagnetic fields by making use of them, what could be learnt if you really got down to years of study of the why and the wherefore of it all? Suppose many men through long periods studied it as closely as modern physics has been studied, might not the results be quite astonishing?

It seems to me that scraps of evidence all over the world appear to indicate that this has once been done. But was it ever done here? Is it not possible that what now survives is but a fragment of all that could be remembered of what was taught to the local people by our hypothetical explorers?

Were the local people not encouraged to build up the power of the stone circles and other beacon marks by dancing, and had not some explanation been given them of why it was necessary for them to do so? Of course this is just a guess, but where did so-called primitive peoples such as the Kahunas of the Pacific get their learning?

There is no anthropological suggestion that Pacific Islanders ever sat down to think out metaphysical ideas for themselves. The teachings of the Kahunas seem to have been derived from a far higher level of civilization than anything observed by Europeans when they first made their way into the Pacific.

Their control of fire, the forces of nature, of disease and so on and their beliefs in the different levels of man’s existence seem to argue a long period of deep reflection and study behind them. The higher self, for instance, is surely something which is only beginning to be glimpsed today by people working on extra-sensory perception; while the lower self seems to have been just touched on by modern students of the subconscious.

Your higher self, said the Kahunas, if you could get in touch with it, could do anything for you; but you had to be able to contact it. It was not God and you were part of it. In fact it was very like the group soul, whose existence was apparently reported by Myers and others, after their deaths, to the research workers of a generation ago and to the spiritualists of today. It is remarkable that something of the kind can be deduced from a study of the pendulum.

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Legend of the Sons of God. A Fantasy? By T.C. Lethbridge; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1972, ISBN 2-283-98128-8.
[2] The Lethbridge Symposium in June 2010 discusses new discoveries by David Brandon.[Ed]

Comments

The Spiral of Evolution by Tom Lethbridge

Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:14:44 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1976 [1]

We have talked about a considerable amount of differing subjects in this study. Much of it probably does not make sense to those who read it. However, it may be less difficult to those who read psychology, although I think that all the evidence is that we are dealing with a Superconscious [2] and not some obscure part of the subconscious mind.

All sorts of nonsense is attributed to this corner of the subconscious mind’s mischievous tricks with ouija boards and such like. But, if a human mind can be shown to exist on a higher level than the mind on earth, is there any reason to suppose that it might not amuse itself at the expense of minds which did not treat it with proper respect? When approached reasonably this unknown factor of mind is most serious and extremely exact. It is the method of approach which is at fault. If you treat a higher version of yourself as if it were an idiot child, what can you expect but ridicule?

It seems to me, although I am not of course really capable of giving an opinion, that this unknown quality of mind is really our own self on the next level of the Spiral of Evolution. It knows far more than we do because (its vibrational level being much higher) it does not have to use a brain to filter out everything, except such parts of its experience as are suitable to life on earth.

It lives in a timeless zone and can consider everything at leisure. It is far more our real self than we are in bodily life. Time being instantaneous to it, it knows the earthly future of its own projected self. Yet, owing to the fact that each whorl of the spiral extends further out than the one beneath, there is bound to be some distortion when its knowledge is transmitted to the whorl below. This is clear when we draw it out in diagrams.

This part of our mentality appears to live forever, yet there are at least two higher whorls on the spiral. The one above our own has no rate for death. Somehow the mind appears to move on from the timeless state and re-enter a world where time passes once more.

There is no need to bother about this here. Obviously we are not meant to do much about it, for we seem to be here to gather information which can be contemplated higher up. But the spiral shows us a great deal which should be comforting to those who worry about what happens to themselves or their friends when they die.

As I have said, the next whorl of the spiral is larger and extends further out than the one on which we live. Nearly all things which we know here are on it also. Blue is blue and gold is gold. But when people’s minds slip up on to the higher level, either by accident or by illness or in sleep, they not infrequently report looking down on their earthly bodies from a height of a few feet above and to one side of them.

The spiral explains this completely. Being on the higher whorl, the viewer is both above and to one side of his body. Until he reaches the second whorl, he is in his body. When he is somehow jerked on to the second whorl, he is then higher up and at one side. This is not strange, it is obvious when once you have found the clue.

Divination with the pendulum is one reasonably exact way of learning things about higher levels of vibrations that is of whorls on the spiral, which are known as planes of living. The pendulum itself is no more than a piece of apparatus. It is not something with a mind of its own, nor magical in any way.

It can be nothing more than a lump of chewing gum on a length of cotton. But the operator’s mind has control over what the pendulum shall do. It can tell it for instance that it will count ten years for every turn the pendulum makes when tuned in to the 30-inch rate for age and held over a given object. Or the mind can tell it to count one year for each turn and it will apparently do so.

This does not mean the whole operation is mental. As I write this my mind is telling my brain so to control my pen that it will write down such words as I wish it to do. But the pen is the necessary inanimate instrument for the writing. So is the pendulum for this form of divination.

With a pendulum you could learn what was happening to a spacecraft on the far side of a planet, as easily as you can find out what is happening to the inside of somebody’s body to whom you are linked in Australia. We have done this, checked it and know that it is quite simple. Why it happens is another matter and it needs much practical, scientific study to find out. [3]

We are still finding ancient beliefs, which appear to be correct. Telepathy exists, as hundreds had affirmed it did, and now we appear to find that the mental side of our being owes something to those blood relations of ours who died long ago. There was some sense in it when the Arabs hung the pedigrees of their horses round their beautiful necks.

It seems probable that far too little attention is given to this kind of thing. After all you do not expect a Suffolk Punch to sire the winner of the Grand National; or a poodle and a fox terrier to produce the winning collie at the sheepdog trials. Such things are known to be absurd. Why should man be an exception to this heredity?

With sheepdogs at any rate it is mental qualities which you are testing at the trials, as anyone must know who has watched these beautiful animals. Many a time, at anchor in a Highland loch, I have watched three or four dogs bring along hundreds of sheep from a whole rugged mountain face, perhaps two thousand feet high or more, and never miss one amid the gullies and boulders.

Don’t tell me that this skill is due to environment. It is the result of careful breeding over hundreds of years. The same must be true of human beings and could be studied without too much difficulty. My wife’s boat skill or my attempts at drawing appear to be direct memories from single individuals and nothing to do with a nebulous subhuman part. I think it must have a direct connection with individual minds on a higher and not a lower level. It is superconscious rather than subconscious.

Hereditary memory is private to you and not available to humanity at large. I do not really believe that anything of this sort can be the subconscious tribal memories postulated by psychologists. It is too individual for that and there is no apparent distinction between different grades of it.

Of course this could be used as an argument in favour of reincarnation. It may be your own memory from a former existence that you are tapping. But it does not look as if this is the right answer, because you can get these memories from more than one ancestor. My drawing appears to come from my father but the love of the Hebrides seems to come from my mother’s people. These attributes could not have come from a single individual ancestor.

All the way through an investigation of this kind, it is the small indications which we must look for. Slowly they will build up into a great whole.

The Buddhists have their Wheel of Life, which is similar to our compass rose of rates; although they do not seem to have got as far as the spiral. But the general idea seems to be much the same. They believe that the mind goes on developing until it is at last absorbed in the whole of Mind (Nirvana). I think much of this must have been guessing, for it seems unlikely that their thinkers could have risen many whorls in the spiral. Still it does not appear to differ to any great extent from what the pendulum is trying to tell us.

As indifferently explained and comparatively misunderstood in the West, the Doctrine of Nirvana does not seem particularly attractive to those with a Christian background. But examined more closely, it seems to make more sense than the celestial concert parties which we were brought up to expect in a future life.

The Buddhist quest for Nirvana was a highly developed idea. Life on earth was thought to be an unpleasant experience; but you had to endure it again and again, not necessarily perhaps on the earth whorl, until you improved your mind to such an extent that it could join up with the greater one. Although this is often translated as oblivion, that seems to be a most unlikely answer. The smaller mind is simply joined to a greater one and an increased sense of perfection and bliss could well result from the union as the Buddhists believe; but individuality remains.

A few people may think that their intelligence is perfect but the great majority know its limits and would welcome additions to it. Whether the Buddhist Nirvana is far higher still is a matter of guessing both for us and for them. However, I can see little at fault in the Buddhist theory as far as we are instructed by the pendulum. It might well be that Christianity would look much the same as Buddhism, if it were stripped of the barnacles of dogma, which have grown on its hull through the ages; but the barnacles have grown so thick that it is hard to see the ship inside.

The Lord Buddha probably never saw the sea and his doctrine, produced far away from it, was bound to be unsatisfactory in some directions. It did not account for the men who moved on what seemed to be a totally alien element. Christian, Moslem and Hebrew all knew the beauty and fear of the ocean. Not so the Buddhist and therefore he was condemned to an almost endless circle of boring lives.

No, there is not enough of the seaman ‘chancing his arm’ in Buddhism. I have quoted elsewhere the fine remark on this subject in the Orkneyinga Saga. When Sigurd, Earl of Orkney, asked his mother whether he should go to Dublin and fight in the war against the native Irish, she replied: ‘I would have raised thee in my wool-chest had I thought that thou shouldst live for ever.’ Sigurd went and did not return. But he won an honoured name in the process and perhaps his mother was consoled with that. My wife once said: ‘I can’t understand people who are always looking for security. Surely the whole point of life is to learn how to deal with insecurity.’

No real artist can ever be secure, for he knows that he can never create a perfect picture. Whatever he does he will see flaws in it. It was for this reason that the Moslems always used to put an error in the weaving of a rug. Allah would not like it to be perfect. Only Allah could make the perfect thing. I like this idea. Many of their ideas are good and their ancient literature shows a sense of humour far in advance of anything in contemporary medieval Europe.

Now the only faith you need in order to get to this stage of thinking is a belief that your observations from your own experiments are reasonably accurate. You do not start with somebody’s statement that God wishes you to do this or that. You collect observed fact, which appears to tell you what I have written now and from these facts you reason. To this extent you are far nearer to the scientific approach.

But the reasoning from what you have observed brings you closer to the faith of the religious people. What is the obvious conclusion that you are likely to draw? Surely it must be that somebody, long ago, worked all this out in a scientific manner and that much religious teaching today is the survival here and there of part of what was once knowledge.

Endnotes

[1] Source: final two chapters (12 & 13 pages 104-110) of the published writings of T.C. Lethbridge; The Power of the Pendulum; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1976, ISBN 1-85063-003-8 published five years after Lethbridge’s death.
[2] 'The human mind possesses an unconscious basement, full of black beetles and vermin, but it also possesses a superconscious attic, which is as much ‘above’ ordinary consciousness as the basement is below it…it is this ‘attic’ which is responsible for paranormal powers like telepathy, second sight and precognition.’ Colin Wilson’s summary of Aldous Huxley’s views in the epilogue to Aleister Crowley (page 163-166). [Ed]
[3] Source (from here): final chapter of The Power of the Pendulum by T.C. Lethbridge.

Comments

Creating Gods by Tom Lethbridge

Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:09:51 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1976 [1]

For most of Christendom, since the Dark Ages, God has been thought of and illustrated as an august human father figure with a beard. According to the Bible, God suggested and made man in His own image and so it was reasonable to suppose that God bore some resemblance to the bearded men of the age.

But this is mainly based on a Hebrew view of God. Other races had other ideas and some even applied the term to living men with outstanding qualities. Roman Emperors, for instance, became gods and Herod, before his unfortunate infestation with worms, had been hailed as a god.

It seems probable that many gods of the ancient world had had their origin in living men who had once been famous in their day. Things became even more confusing when we appreciate that the word ‘Devil’ in reality refers to a god of a different faith and is not necessarily evil at all. In fact the ‘div’ or ‘dev’ part of the word means ‘holy’. It is easy to see that this conflict of meanings, when added to that of the difficulty of ‘spirit’, becomes very complicated for laymen and professional religious alike.

When confronted with a tangle of this sort, and especially a tangle whose origins go back into the mists of time, the best thing to do seems to be to cut out all the dead wood. Then we can regard both God and Spirit as something mental. Let us say that God is Mind. We will no longer regard God as a bearded old man. Man is created with a mind in the image of the Great Creator. The beard is of no importance, for this is not mind but body. In fact man is created with a bit of mind, which can think.

There is no reason to suppose that I have got this right, but it may be worth thinking about as we progress in this investigation. Man may be a little bit of mind separated off from the Universal Mind of the Creator of Everything. Of course this does not fit in with the doctrine of chance, but it is really very hard to see how you could get anything at all unless someone started it. Why should there be anything on which chance could operate?

Although I cannot bring myself to believe in the old man with a beard, I find the chance idea still less probable. Even man can create to a moderate extent; why should not a much greater mind create far more extensively? To assume, as many do, that any trivial human mind can know the purpose and intention of a mind which can sprinkle the Universe with numberless stars, seems to me to be little more than gross presumption.

To get any sense out of the idea, it seems necessary to assume the existence of a vast hierarchy of minds in descending order from the Great One at the top to the tiny human specimen beneath. But it might go farther than this, with a spark of mind existing in every living organism.

I hope to show presently that man appears to have the ability of detaching portions of his mind and locating these in the things he makes or uses. In this way perhaps our assumed hierarchy could be formed. It would be thought into existence and each unit would be an image of the Creator; not in bodily appearance, but in the way in which it thought. It is interesting to note that this story of the creation of man in God’s image is not confined to the Bible but is found in much the same form in the pre-Spanish legends of America.

The study of thought is of fundamental importance. With it you seem to be able to create. It is the force with which Mind operates. Enlarge your thinking and you extend your mind. Do not do so, or rely on the products of other people’s thinking, and you are more useless than a slug creeping on the surface of the earth.

For evolution appears to be a command from the Creator of the Universe, though it differs very much from the evolution of the Darwin and Huxley variety. Although I have taken little interest in the theory of reincarnation, yet it seems very probable that those who cannot be bothered to develop their minds will have to return to earth again after death and do the whole business again.

It may be of interest to describe one of my attempts to investigate the old gods. [2] There was a god of the sea, Manannan, to whom the Celts of Britain paid homage. Very little is recorded about him, yet his name remains in Clackmannan in Scotland, which means Manannan’s stone. There are also well-known hobby-horse rituals performed on May Day down the coast of Devon and Cornwall by sea fishermen and it is assumed that the hobby-horses may well be the white horses of the sea, who also belonged to Poseidon. Therefore one might suspect that Poseidon and Manannan are two names for the one god. This happens to most ancient gods. Isis was said to have a thousand names.

Yet who really thinks that there was such an entity as Poseidon? I can’t say that it seems possible today to visualise anyone of the sort. But, if for hundreds of years men concentrated their thoughts on a figure of this kind and wished fervently for its help, what would happen? Each one probably detached something of his mind into the creation of this non-existent figure. Poseidon becomes a mass of detached thoughts and there was a Poseidon.

I think he would not be what we call alive in an earthly sense. But he would be a cloud of force, which some might be able to tap. We surely must not look on the old gods as never having existed. They existed as long as men believed in their existence. The old witches still believe that they can see them if they go through the correct ritual.

It is well recorded that the fishermen of the North of Lewis used to wade into the sea at the beginning of the fishing season and pour a libation of beer to a sea god, who has been named as Shoney. I do not think that this was his name but simply a distortion of the Gaelic for Holy One.

Recently I read a book by Lilian Beckwith called Green Hand. This interested me for it was a careful study of the fishing life of Mallaig and the Western islands. Miss Beckwith included a curious jingle. I felt she must have heard it aboard a fishing boat at a party described in the book. The little rhyme went like this:

Ickle, Ockle, Blue Bockle,
Fishes in the Sea.
If you’re looking for a lover,
Please choose me.

It was the Blue Bockle, which caught my eye. For Bocan is a godling in Gaelic and Bogle is the same in Scots. Blue Bockle is a blue godling and presumably he came from the Outer Hebrides. Then I got down to the whole rhyme. It is a quaint mixture of Scots and Gaelic. I think it can be translated like this:

Little, youthful, blue godling
(Of the) fishes of the sea.
If you’re looking for devotion,
Please choose me.

This appears to be the charm, which the men of Lewis called to Shoney when they poured beer into the sea. For many years I had waited for this clue. The Blue Men of the Minch were gods.

Now the normal Celtic god has three phases (or personalities), young, prime of life, and old. There would be three Blue Men, or just possibly nine, for each phase in turn might be triple. The Blue Bockle was the young one. To the old one (probably called bodach gorm) they sacrificed cattle. Are our coastwise hobby-horses with their emphasis on fertility, the steeds of the god in his prime? I think it is very likely, and we have the whole cycle of the worship of Manannan.

I don’t know if Poseidon was blue, but I seem to remember that he was dark. Even when ashore he was associated with white horses and fertility; while black bulls were thrown into the sea in his honour. It looks very much as if Poseidon and Manannan are synonymous. How would you describe a god of this kind? I think it would be as a cloud of past memories; but it is to some extent animated by the combined minds of those who created it. It can probably be seen and most certainly it can be felt.

A single individual can produce a ghost or ghoul by his thought or memory projected into an electromagnetic field. Many people together in a similar way can project a mass thought or memory and it becomes known as a god or a demon. Both types really belong to the second mental level on which time does not appear to operate and so to earth-living minds they may appear in past or future time. Without some other interference they would never end at all. The gods are immortal.

I have told in Ghost and Ghoul how a gypsy woman once came to my house in Cambridge and asked for a gold coin, which she was convinced that I had. She would not believe there was no such coin in the house. The coin was found many years later in Devon. She had got her dating confused owing to the absence of time on the next level whence she drew her information somehow.

This absence of time on one whorl and its presence on others, is a fundamental matter and until it is understood the errors in dreams and foretelling the future will remain inexplicable. Now, however, that we can begin to get our information collected in diagrammatical form, it should become easier to understand.

No doubt there will be mistakes in my attempts at explanation; but it is open to anybody to write down his dreams and examine them for himself and it is also possible for at least half mankind to experiment with the pendulum. (The idea that few can be dowsers is wrong).

The picture that seems to be forming is not utterly unlike Dunne’s theory of serialism. There appears to be a series of observers (if you can so describe a succession of degrees of mental awareness) but they are not exact counterparts of the original observer. The time succession is quite unlike his, for the second observer finds himself on a mental plane where there is succession but no movement of time. On the third plane, time begins to move once more.

It seems possible that the Roman Catholic idea of Purgatory originated in some knowledge of what appears to happen on the second timeless whorl. The more one looks into these subjects, the clearer it becomes that far back in the past ages men knew much more about them than they do today. One has only to look at the teachings of Jesus, Buddha and the Kahunas to see that this must be so.

It is hard to visualise what happens on the second plane. But perhaps it is not particularly inept to picture each particular incident as a stone thrown into quiet water with ripples spreading out in all directions. There will be an infinite number of these points and the ripples will have no troughs between them.

The earth level time will pass through a particular point in a straight line; whichever way it passes through, it will hit the same successions. However, some will go forward and some backward. If you happen to concentrate on the backward ripples, you will return from sleep with an impression of things moving backwards.

However, if you concentrate on the forward series, you will at first get ordinary memories of events which have already happened in earth time; and then, as the point on the second level does not move, you will receive impressions of things which have not yet happened.

Whether the second-level impressions are more true than those on the earth plane is difficult to decide. A little way back we had a hint that telepathy at any rate operated on this level. If this is right, then telepathic dreams must pass from the second level to the earth plane and so perhaps all do. The impact of the stone on the water may be spread out in earth time so that we can learn more from what we appreciate.

Although this is all most difficult to understand, yet it has to be explained somehow and for the moment I can get no further with it. We must not forget there is a third level above the second on which time moves on again once more. There is even a fourth level above this, where once again moving time appears to exist.

Of course the term ‘level’ is not correct. It would be more exact to speak of whorls of the spiral. Their number may be unlimited, yet we have as yet only found evidence of one (the second) on which time is static. On this one too there is no response to death at 80-inches although there is for black on the same rate.

Therefore the second whorl appears to differ very greatly from the one on which our minds normally appear to function. Although reds, greens and blues are still there and silver is still silver, there is no apparent passing of time and there is no need for you to go to sleep or die on it before moving on to the third.

Of course I am only getting this information from the pendulum; but numerous other experimenters are now beginning to get similar results to mine and at least at one point there appears to be a link with orthodox science.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapter 2 (pages 14-17) and Chapter 5 (pages 49-52) in The Power of the Pendulum; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1976, ISBN 1-85063-003-8.
[2] Lethbridge was influenced by the research and theories of his friend Margaret Alice Murray. See Dr. Murray’s The God of the Witches; NuVisions Publications, 2005, ISBN 1-59547-981-3. [Ed]

Comments

Science & Religion

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:52:36 +0200

© Stephen Jay Gould 2001 [1]

The magisterium of science covers the empirical realm: what is the universe made of (fact) and why does it work this way (theory). The magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value. These two magisteria do not overlap. Nor do they encompass all inquiry (consider, for example, the magisterium of art and the meaning of beauty). To cite the old clichés, science gets the age of rocks, and religion the rock of ages; science studies how the heavens go, religion how to go to heaven.

I believe, with all my heart, in a respectful, even loving, concordat between the magisteria of science and religion. This is a principled position on moral and intellectual grounds, not a merely diplomatic solution. But it cuts both ways. If religion can no longer dictate the nature of factual conclusions residing properly within the magisterium of science, then scientists cannot claim higher insight into moral truth from any superior knowledge of the world’s empirical constitution.

In advocating this argument over many years, I have found that skeptical friends and colleagues do not challenge the logic of the argument - which almost everyone accepts as both intellectually sound and eminently practical in our world of diverse passions - but rather question my claim that most religious and scientific leaders actually do advocate such precepts.

We all recognize, of course, that many folks and movements hold narrow and aggressive partisan positions, usually linked to an active political agenda, and based on exalting one side while bashing the other. Obviously, extremists of the so-called Christian right, particularly the small segment dedicated to imposing creationism on the science curricula of American public schools, represent the most visible subgroup of these partisans.

But I also include, among my own scientific colleagues, some militant atheists whose blinkered concept of religion grasps none of the subtlety or diversity, and equates this entire magisterium with the silly and superstitious beliefs of people who think they have seen a divinely crafted image of the Virgin in the drying patterns of morning dew on the plate-glass windows of some auto show-room in New Jersey.

I believe that we must pursue a primarily political struggle, not an intellectual discourse, with these people. With some exceptions, of course, people who have dedicated the bulk of their energy, and even their life’s definition, to such aggressive advocacy at the extremes do not choose to engage in serious and respectful debate. All people committed to the defense of honorable differences will have to remain vigilant and prevail politically.

Even after we put the extremists aside, however, many people still suppose that major religious and scientific leaders must remain at odds (or at least must interact in considerable tension) because these two incompatible fields inevitably struggle for possession of the same ground.

If I can therefore show that the doctrine of Non-Overlapping Magisteria enjoys strong and fully explicit support, even from the primary cultural stereotypes of hard-line traditionalism, then its status as a sound position of general consensus, established by long struggle among people of goodwill in both magisteria - and not as a funny little off-the-wall suggestion by a few misguided peacemakers on an inevitable battlefield - should emerge into the clearest possible light.

Modern creationism, alas, has provoked a real battle thus supporting the Doctrine of Non-Overlapping Magisteria with a positive example of the principle that all apparent struggles between science and religion really arise from violations of the doctrine, when a small group allied to one magisterium tries to impose its irrelevant and illegitimate will upon the other’s domain. Such genuine historical battles do not pit science against religion, but represent a power play by zealots formally allied to one side, and trying to impose their minority views upon the magisterium of the other side.

The saga of attempts by creationists to ban the teaching of evolution, or to force their own fundamentalist version of life’s history into science curricula of public schools, represents one of the most interesting, distinctive, and persistent episodes in the cultural history of twentieth-century America. I have no problem with the largest and most potentially influential of all creationist groups in America, the Jehovah’s Witnesses - for they do not try to impose their theological beliefs upon public school science curricula, and they agree with my view that churches and homes are the proper venue for teaching such private and partisan doctrines.

Our struggle with creationism is political and specific, not religious at all, and not even intellectual in any genuine sense. Young-earth Creationism offers nothing of intellectual merit but just a hodgepodge of claims properly judged within the magisterium of science. The forceful and persistent attempt by Young-earth Creationists to insinuate their partisan and minority theological dogma into the science curricula of American public schools cannot be read, in any legitimate way, as an episode in any supposedly general warfare between science and religion.

In the early 1920s, several Southern states passed flat-out anti-evolution statutes. The Tennessee law, for example, declared it a crime to teach that ‘man had descended from a lower order of animals.’ In a challenge to the constitutionality of these statutes, the American Civil Liberties Union instigated the famous Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. William Jennings Bryan decided to make his last stand on this issue thereby giving the creationist movement both influence and contacts. [2]

John Scopes was a young free-thinker, who was quite popular among his fundamentalist students and worked as the physics teacher and track coach of the local high school. He had substituted for the fundamentalist biology teacher during an illness and had assigned the chapters on evolution from the class textbook, A Civic Biology, by George William Hunter. Scopes consented to be the stalking horse for a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the Tennessee anti-evolution law.

The rest is history, as filtered and distorted for most Americans, through the fictionalized account in a wonderful play, Inherit the Wind, written in 1955 by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee. Two film versions featured Spencer Tracy playing Clarence Darrow and Fredric Marsh as William Jennings Bryan in the first, and Kirk Douglas as Darrow and Jason Robards as Bryan in the later remake for television.

In the 1980s the creationists regrouped, and came back fighting with a new strategy designed to circumvent constitutional problems. They had always honorably identified their alternative system as explicitly theological, and doctrinally based in a literal reading of the Bible. But now they expurgated their texts, inventing the oxymoronic concept of ‘creation science’. Religion, it seems, and contrary to all previous pronouncements, has no bearing upon the subject at all. The latest discoveries of pure science now reveal a factual world that just happens to correlate perfectly with the literal pronouncements of the Book of Genesis.

In such a circumstance, legislative intervention becomes unnecessary. And besides, the creationists continued, we’re not asking schools to ban evolution anymore. Now we are only demanding ‘equal time’ for ‘creation science’ in any classroom that also teaches evolution. Of course, if they decide not to teach evolution at all…well…then…

A few years ago, I came across a theological term that tickled my fancy, both for its touch of the arcane, and its mellifluous ring - irenics (from the Greek word for ‘peace’), defined in opposition to polemics, as a branch of Christian theology that ‘presents points of agreement among Christians with a view to the ultimate unity of Christianity’ (Oxford English Dictionary).

By extension (and the word has crept out of theological circles and into general English usage), irenic people and proposals ‘tend to promote peace, especially in relation to theological and ecclesiastical differences.’ Now I’m an irenic fellow at heart - and I trust that most of us so regard ourselves, whatever personal quirks and foibles stand in the way of realization.

I believe in an irenic solution under a large umbrella extending far beyond the purely Christian realm of official definitions cited above. I join nearly all people of goodwill in wishing to see two old and cherished institutions, our two rocks of ages - science and religion - coexisting in peace while each works to make a distinctive patch for the integrated coat of many colors that will celebrate the distinctions of our lives, yet cloak human nakedness in a seamless covering called wisdom.

Irenics sure beats the polemics of ill-conceived battle between science and religion - a thoroughly false model that too often continues to envelop us for illogical reasons of history and psychology. I do get discouraged when some of my colleagues tout their private atheism (their right, of course, and in many ways my own suspicion as well) as a panacea for human progress against an absurd caricature of ‘religion’, erected as a straw man for rhetorical purposes.

Religion just can’t be equated with Genesis literalism, the miracle of the liquefying blood of Saint Januarius (which at least provides an excuse for the wonderful and annual San Gennaro Festival on the streets of New York), or the Bible codes of kabbalah and modern media hype.

If these colleagues wish to fight superstition, irrationalism, philistinism, ignorance, dogma, and a host of other insults to the human intellect (often politically converted into dangerous tools of murder and oppression as well), then God bless them - but don’t call this enemy ‘religion’.

Similarly, of course, I pronounce my anathema upon those dogmatists and ‘true believers’ who, usurping the good name of religion for their partisan doctrines, try to suppress the uncomfortable truths of science, or to impose their peculiar brand of moral fiber upon people with legitimately different tastes. In the past, religion set the outlines that everyone had to accept, and science then had to conform. Irenics in this older mode required that the principles and findings of science yield religious results known in advance to be true. Indeed such conformity represented the primary test of science’s power and validity.

The Reverend Thomas Burnet (1635-1715), [3] a close friend and colleague of Isaac Newton, did not doubt that the biblical narrative recorded the earth’s actual history; his scientific job, by his lights, required validation of this known history in terms of causation by invariant natural laws rather than miracles.

But the spectacular growth and success of science has turned the tables for modern versions of syncretism. Now the conclusions of science must be accepted a priori, and religious interpretations must be finessed and adjusted to match unimpeachable results from the magesterium of natural knowledge! The Big Bang happened, and we must now find God at this tumultuous origin.

I also feel particularly sensitive about this issue because, as I wrote this book in the summer of 1998, a deluge of media hype enveloped the syncretist position, as though some startlingly new and persuasive argument had been formulated, or some equally exciting and transforming discovery had been made.

In fact, absolutely nothing of intellectual novelty had been added, as the same bad arguments surfaced into a glare of publicity because the J.M. Templeton Foundation, established by its fabulously wealthy eponym to advance the syncretist program under the guise of more general and catholic (small c) discussion about science and religion, garnered a splash of media attention by spending 1.4 million bucks to hold a conference in Berkeley on ‘Science and the spiritual quest'.

In a genuine example of true creation ex nihilo - that is, the invention of an issue by fiat of media reports, rather than by force of argument or content of material - at least three major sources preached the syncretist gospel in their headlines and vapidly uncritical reports: ‘Faith and reason, Together Again' (The Wall Street Journal, June 12); ‘Science and religion: bridging the Great Divide’ (The New York Times, June 30); and a cover story in Newsweek, 'Science Finds God’. Scientists could only be mystified by this last claim, but at least we can now be certain about one of God’s attributes: he sells newspapers and magazines.

The Times article admitted the intellectual torpor of the proceedings: ‘A kind of Sunday school politeness pervaded the meeting, with none of the impassioned confrontations expected from such an emotionally charged subject…The audience politely applauded after each presentation. But there was little sense of intellectual excitement.’

But from whence could such excitement arise in principle? If the Doctrine of Non-Overlapping Magisteria holds, then facts and explanations developed under the magesterium of science cannot validate (or deny) the precepts of religion. Indeed, if we look at the so-called arguments for syncretism, as described in these reports, they all devolve into a series of fuzzy statements awash in metaphor and illogic.

Darwin has been read as something of a moral dolt, or at least as a slacker on the subject, for his frequent disclaimers about drawing lessons for the meaning of human life from his revolutionary reorganization of biological knowledge. Shouldn’t such a radical reinterpretation of nature offer us some guidance for the biggest questions of the ages: Why are we here, and what does it all mean?

How could anyone look so deeply into the heart of biological causality and the history of life, and then offer us so little on the meaning of life and the ultimate order of things. To which Darwin responded: ‘I feel deeply that the whole subject is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton.’

Was Darwin just a coward? A desiccated intellect? A small-minded man? The very stereotype of a scientist who can describe a tree and ignore the forest, or analyze the notes and not hear the symphony?

I view Darwin in an entirely opposite manner. He maintained, throughout his life, a basic human fascination for the great questions of morals and meanings, and he recognized the transcendent importance of such inquiry. But he knew both the strengths and the limitations of his chosen profession, and he understood that the power of science could only be advanced and consolidated on the fertile ground of its own magesterium. In short, Darwin rooted his views about science and morality in the principle of Non-Overlapping Magisteria.

Darwin did not use evolution to promote atheism, or to maintain that no concept of God could ever be squared with the structure of nature. Rather, he argued that nature’s factuality, as read within the magesterium of science, could not resolve, or even specify, the existence or character of God, the ultimate meaning of life, the proper foundations of morality, or any other question within the different magesterium of religion.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life by Stephen Jay Gould (Jonathan Cape, 2001, ISBN 0-224-06092-9).
[2] See The Last Stand of William Jennings Bryan by William Shepherd.
[3] Burnet wrote one of the most influential books of the late seventeenth century - Telluris theoria sacra, or The Sacred Theory of the Earth, a work in four sections: (1) on the deluge of Noah; (2) on the preceding paradise; (3) on the forthcoming ‘burning of the world’; and (4) ‘concerning the new heavens and new earth’, or paradise regained after the conflagration. This book not only became a ‘bestseller’ in its own generation, but gained lasting fame as a primary inspiration for Giambattista Vico’s Scienza nuova or New Science (1725) and George Buffon’s Histoire naturelle or Natural History (1749). [Ed]

Comments

Avatars by Tom Lethbridge

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:40:54 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

I have asked a lot of difficult questions already, but this one is more likely to land me in a pickle than most. All through history there have been occasional great teachers, often now spoken of by the Hindu term, ‘avatar’, whose births seem to have been inexplicable and teachings far higher than those of the surrounding populace. Did these avatars come down from higher levels of deliberate purpose to try to help people living on a lower level of vibration?

There appear to have been female avatars as well as male; although they are not often mentioned nowadays. Aradia, the avatar of the religion now known as witchcraft, was supposedly born of the goddess, Diana, and taught her disciples both how to handle the bio-electric power and the freedom of the individual, in a manner strongly reminiscent of the great male teachers.

The only candidate that I know of from America was Quetzalcoatl, also a character of mysterious origin. It is interesting, too, that, though he did not apparently claim that rank, Jesus did not deny that he was a son of God. He seemed rather to imply that all or many men were this, although they did not know it. At the same time he insisted that he was the son of Man. Presumably here once again we are up against the old difficulty of the real meaning of words.

The paternity of all avatars is mysterious. This of course may be an idea of the priestly caste to add glamour to the founder of their religion. Even Buddha, although claimed by the orthodox to have come from a respectably princely family, is said to have been fathered by an elephant. By this one supposes that the elephant-headed god, Ganesa, is implied. However to go into the maze of Indian mythology would be more trouble than it is worth. It is more incomprehensible to the western mind than that of ancient Greece or Rome.

The point to remember about three of the avatars at any rate is that they were able to instruct their followers not only with a general code of behaviour but how to control the power of living electricity, which is apparently what ESP is. The Buddhists took this teaching to much greater lengths than anybody in the west. The Christians largely either failed to grasp it or forgot it. The witches knew a lot about it and even bred people deliberately to increase their so-called psychic powers.

The importance of this in our particular enquiry lies in the fact that anyone living on a level of what we might perhaps call ‘higher potential’ would have to lower his voltage in some way before being able to cope with earthly surroundings at all. He would also have to register. That means that somehow he had to make allowances for the distortion due to the position of things on the two, or perhaps more, different whorls of the spiral.

It is here then I can see a possible error happening nearly two thousand years ago. In the Biblical story of the terrible future calamity in which the sun would be ‘turned into darkness and the moon into blood’, had there been a mistake in which ring in the sequence on the timeless level had been taken? Was Jesus really talking about something which had already happened?

If it has been recorded correctly, Jesus evidently thought that it would happen in the lifetime of some of his companions. Some of them may well still have been living at the time of Titus’ siege of Jerusalem in AD 70, but, although this was a revolting siege according to Josephus, it was nothing to compare with the events which Jesus apparently foresaw.

I am well aware that many far more clever men than myself must have spent many hours thinking about this discrepancy and my suggestion may be offending a lot of people. Yet one must tell the truth as far as one sees it. In this particular matter there was an error, either in foretelling the future or in the recording of what was said.

The great trouble, which looks like the description of an atomic war, had either happened long before or was not going to happen for perhaps two thousand years. At least this theory appears to be the explanation of all the conflicting statements in the Gospels. It surely explains too all the difficulties, heresies, schisms and the like which follow all attempts to make a coherent picture of an imaginary interpretation.

If the avatar were omnipotent, then surely everyone would believe in him at once and the whole world would become a good and kindly place. Instead of that, rival variations of beliefs pursued one another through the ages with fire and sword. Jesus realized this and said it would happen: ‘I came not to send peace on earth but with a sword.’

To return to the problem of UFOs. They may be either contemporary visitors from some unknown planet or they may be the work of people, spoken of today as dead, living in a timeless zone above that of our own earth. The first supposition would have seemed utterly impossible before the days of H.G. Wells, but is today quite a commonplace idea. It may be difficult to guess what planet they might be coming from but no longer utterly improbable. Even with our primitive modern rockets, it is possible to see that the problems of long space travel might be overcome by any fortunate, or perhaps unfortunate, discovery in a comparatively few years.

The second idea would still seem fantastic to very many people who are still wedded to the concept of only one stage of living and that confined to the surface of a single earth. An earth with onion skins of different levels of existence cannot easily be grasped by people with a materialistic or rationalistic upbringing. Yet this idea would not seem particularly strange to advanced Buddhist or Hindu thinkers. The Buddhists with their ‘wheel of life’ are very near it but have not apparently as yet seen that the wheel is a double spiral. [2]

There are pointers to the occurrence of the second type of happening in the Bible itself, but since the witnesses who observed the incident clearly did not understand what appears to have been taking place, the orthodox interpretation is not particularly convincing nowadays. You can appreciate that much of the reporting in the Bible is true without believing a word of the dogma, which has been built up upon it through the ages. That is one of the difficulties today. Because of the incredibility of the dogma, people tend to throw away the baby with the bath water.

The two incidents which we must look at both concern ascents into heaven. The first is that of Elijah and is simply a traditional story somewhat dramatized by whoever wrote it down. The second is the Ascension itself and apparently a far more accurate account. But there is great similarity between the two stories. Not only that, but they are also very much like the dematerializations which are reported by Hindu and Buddhist sages to this day.

The Ascension is by far the most important and is entirely distinct from the vexed question of what really happened at the Crucifixion. At the Ascension a living man actually vanished in the sight of a large number of people. It is very hard to dismiss this as an account of a conjuring trick because it made such a great impression on those who saw it that it has not been forgotten for nearly two thousand years. Conjuring tricks are a commonplace in the Eastern world and had it been one, no such impression would have survived. The incident carried complete conviction. [3]

Having said this much, let us see what the Gospels appear to relate. I have taken the two following accounts from J.B. Phillips’ recent translations of the Gospels, but they are little different from the wording of the James I version:

'Then He led them outside as far as Bethany, where He blessed them with uplifted hands. While He was in the act of blessing them He parted from them and was carried up to Heaven.’ (St Luke)

'When He had said these words He was lifted up before their eyes till a cloud hid Him from their sight.’ (St John)

It is clear, I think, that the witnesses did not understand what had happened and the words ‘carried up to Heaven’ and ‘a cloud hid Him from their sight’ were added to the straightforward report in explanation of an apparently impossible event.

However, if we remember the numerous reports of ‘out of body’ experiences and the evidence of the spiral, it is possible to see what had happened. Jesus, a master of bio-electronic power, had simply accelerated his vibrations and moved up on the next whorl of the spiral. There, as we have already observed, he would be invisible to the watchers. There are numerous modern Hindu accounts of this feat being performed by their learned men and also of their subsequent return.

The whole Ascension story in the Gospels is claimed as the promise of human survival of death and, as far as one can judge, indeed it is, but hardly of the type of survival which is generally imagined. This is in itself a glorified picture of what was believed to be the most happy situation two thousand years ago. The harps and the songs and all the rest of it are a reflection of that bygone age, when a feast was the height of enjoyment.

The Elijah story may well have once been similar. In fact some Hindu experts believe Jesus to have been a reincarnation not of Elijah but of his disciple Elisha, who was promised a double portion of Elijah’s spirit if he could see him carried into heaven.

The point about Elijah’s aerial exploit is that it has been quoted in various works as evidence for the former existence of flying saucers. What actually does the Bible say?

'Elijah said unto Elisha, Ask what I shall do for thee, before I be taken away from thee. And Elisha said, I pray thee, let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me. And he said, Thou has asked a hard thing: nevertheless, if thou see me when I am taken from thee, it shall be so unto thee, but if not, it shall not be so. And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha saw it, and he cried, My father, my father, the chariot of Israel and the horsemen thereof. And he saw him no more.’ Authorized Version. 2 Kings, 2, verses 9-11

This dramatic story had probably been handed down by word of mouth for a long time before it was put into writing. The vehicle, if there was one, was indescribable and so spoken of as a chariot. A chariot had to have horses and they were added, quite reasonably. But nobody emerged from the chariot; although Elijah apparently knew it was coming. When it came he vanished in a whirlwind.

One can see how this story fits in well with modern accounts of flying saucers; but we are left with a doubt whether anything more than a dust-devil, or willy-waw, was ever seen. Elijah, an accomplished practitioner of ESP (or shall we call it magic?) simply vanished. How he went nobody, probably not even Elisha, ever knew.

I don’t know how it strikes others, but I personally suspect that Elisha had to say he had seen the chariot to explain his subsequent magic powers. One wonders too whether the scribe who wrote the story down was familiar with the Greek beliefs in which Gods flew about the heavens in chariots drawn by horses.

Whatever may have been the truth of Elijah’s disappearance, a feeling remains that it may have been very like the Ascension. Unfortunately there was only a single witness and there is quite a possibility either that he may have been biased in his subsequent account, or that the author of the second book of Kings was somewhat carried away by the drama of the incident. On the whole it does not seem possible to use this story as an argument in favour of the former existence of flying saucers.

When we turn to the problem of how anyone could possibly pass from one level of vibration to one of perhaps four times faster rate, we are humbugged by a lack of general knowledge. It is a problem well ahead of science at its present stage.

We do know that a living scientist today is not the solid object he appears to be, but is really almost entirely empty space, a series of holes joined together by French knitting. In fact he may only be there at all because somebody else thinks of him. In any case you could have dozens of different scientists fitted into the holes in the first one.

People used to think that they knew all about matter; but today they do at least realize that they hardly know anything at all. Matter may be energy, still what is that? Energy may be vibrations. What are they?

All that is really known is that if you do certain things, certain results will follow and the range of action in which the foreseeable results are known is very limited. It has not even begun to dawn on the scientific world that, by changing the rate of vibration, you might land bang in another scientific world much more advanced than your own.

As I said at the beginning, I am only putting up questions to most of which there is no known answer. I do not believe in the answers I have put forward, except to a very limited degree. For instance I do think that I have got the right method by which the bluestones were transported to Stonehenge. But I hope that it will provoke enough interest for others to try to solve some of the problems which are too difficult for me to answer.

In any case this is all imagination and we do not really know what unidentified flying objects may be: ghosts, hallucinations, time machines or honest to God visitors from another planet. Whatever they might be, they offer us an interesting subject for talk and speculation and the answer may come sooner than anyone expects.

I shall finish now. Many people will think it is all rubbish. Others will see some sense in it, even if I have produced no hard and fast theory. At least I hope I have given a few something to turn over in their minds, to see whether they can produce anything more satisfactory than I have been able to.

Endnotes

[i] Source: The Legend of the Sons of God (1972) by Tom Lethbridge included as Chapter 11 in The Essential T.C.Lethbridge edited by Tom Graves & Janet Hoult; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1980, ISBN 0 586 05077 9.
[ii] In fact, as Jesus so rightly said, you have to ‘become again as little children’ and reorientate all your ideas from the start. This, thanks largely to the inventiveness of television script writers, children of today appear to be quite ready to do. It means little to them that people should jump about in time and place. I have quite a number of letters from teenagers who obviously have a good idea of the possibilities, although they tell me that their views are ridiculed by their elders.
[iii] I may seem unduly credulous here, but one must remember that very little history is in any way exact. As recently as the great battle of Jutland, when I was still at school, there was only one case of exact reporting. A boy seaman in a destroyer was made to write in the log the time and the exact bearing of every incident which took place. As a reward for this devotion to duty, the boy was taken ashore afterwards and given the best meal his heart desired at the expense of the destroyer’s first lieutenant. The lieutenant himself, the only man in the whole British fleet who realized the importance of a record, received no commendation at all, although he eventually retired from the Navy as a captain.

Comments

UFOs by Tom Lethbridge

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:38:44 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

The problem of the stone circles and alignments is really one proper to the old world although others are known, particularly in Peru. The new world has others of its own. For instance, what are we to make of the remarkable animal mounds found in considerable numbers to the south and west of the Great Lakes? The Indians have no idea who made them and there seems to be little archaeological evidence for their date.

The largest of these appears to be the Great Serpent Mound of Adams County, Ohio. The mound is five feet high on a thirty foot base and if straightened out would be more than a thousand feet, say three hundred metres, long. The work necessary to produce a mound of this size is great and what possible purpose was it intended to serve?

Seen from the ground it is nothing but a bank. Only from above is its serpentine form obvious. It is the same with the tortoise, alligator, eagle, lizard, elk, bear, otter, wolf and frog mounds, while some apparently represent human beings.

When once the possibility of the stone circles and alignments of the old world having been used as beacons for aerial navigation has entered one’s mind, the same possibility can be appreciated with regard to the animal mounds of the United States. However, in their case the beacons would only be visual ones, unless there was some method of charging them with bio-electronic force. This is not so impossible as most people would think today.

Now I bring in a new puzzle, even if I seem to be involving the reader in the imagination of space travel. As before, I do not know the answer, but it is evident to me that an answer could be found and should be sought, even if the seeker may be greeted with ridicule by those who have not the imagination to look for it. Of course I refer to the huge and growing mass of statements, often by highly competent eye-witnesses, that strange flying objects are frequently seen in the sky. These are known widely now as UFOs, unidentified flying objects.

Now people may exaggerate and they may mistake what they think they see. I have seen photographs in the papers, which look as if they had been the shades of Tilley lamps and I have read accounts which were obviously distortions of the real facts. However there is a large residuum, which clearly needs an explanation. People as a whole report truly what they have seen to the best of their ability.

A recent announcement on the BBC News makes it obvious that something needs investigation. As far as I can now remember the radio said that the American Air Force was closing down a department formed to investigate reports on UFOs. They had examined thousands of reports of sightings and there were only about seven hundred which they could not explain.

Good heavens, could any official department expect to get away with that? Seven hundred unexplained cases of what might be visitors from another planet, and it was not worth the trouble and expense of trying to find out what they were! Suppose you had many reports that there were thousands of spies in your country and of these only seven hundred could not be shown to be innocent, what would you think of a government which gave up vetting them?

If correctly reported, this must surely be one of the most naïve announcements in history! I don’t know whether UFOs exist or not; but I do think that it is most important to find out whether they do. However, before talking more about these UFOs, let me return for a moment to the reports of wheels in the sky.

There may be nothing more in it than coincidence. Someone, being unable to describe it in any other manner, may call a revolving object a wheel; but it is at least curious that symbols described by archaeologists as ‘sun discs’ are by no means rarely found carved on stones of the megalithic and early Bronze Ages in western Europe. Sometimes they are simply a ring; again they may be a ring with a dot in the centre and, more curiously, a ring with a cross carved on it.

A sequence of these carvings, not infrequently found together with symbols for ships, is published from Brittany to Ireland and from there to the celebrated Swedish rock engravings. A case has been made out for the existence of a complete sequence of ship and sun disc symbols from Scandinavia to ancient Egypt. Frequently they are so crudely executed that without a knowledge of more perfect examples it would be impossible to interpret the pictures. But with a sequence available there can be little doubt what was intended by the carvers.

In the most celebrated burial cairn of New Grange on the Boyne in Ireland there is one of these symbols in the central chamber. No one would probably have been able to identify it without a knowledge of the Swedish and Breton engravings; but with this knowledge the intention is clear. Are these discs meant to represent the sun at all; or was the idea to picture the vehicles in which the gods were transported through the heavens?

For many years I have just taken it for granted that when the older generation of archaeologists talked of these things as ‘sun discs’, they knew what they were talking about. Now, as with so many other current dogmas, I am not so sure that they did.

Even if the ancient Egyptian symbol did come to represent the Sun God, Ra, and the boat in which he daily crossed the heavens, is this what was originally intended? Was not Ra himself one of the sons of God, venerated in later years as the great God himself?

Of course it would be much less trouble to leave it all unquestioned; to go on as if nothing had happened and nobody had ever reported seeing wheels in the sky, or photographed objects up there which could not be explained in terms of present day knowledge. But, if we have any real curiosity in our make-up, we cannot just shrug it off.

What we can say at this stage is that at the approximate time when men all over the old world were apparently beginning to venerate a multitude of aerial gods, they were also suggesting that they moved about the heavens in boats and things with or like wheels.

Through the ages these gods took on varying characteristics, but this was doubtless due to frequent repetition and downright invention by priestly castes, whose job it was to keep the beliefs in being.

All this too was imposed apparently upon a set of earlier beliefs in which men had a tribal totem in the form of some animal. The combination of the totem animal with gods in human form who flew about in the heavens produced some very curious creatures indeed.

Although I am not qualified to do so and have no real personal experience of the matter at all, I must try to make some estimate of how the problem of the UFOs strike me as an ordinary member of the populace.

I look on it with a completely open mind. I neither believe nor disbelieve. My object in writing this book is just this, to stimulate people to think, observe and experiment for themselves and not just swallow the sayings of the authorities of the time as if these were the Word of God.

However I do have one article of faith and that is that a witness should be believed until he can be shown to be either lying or mistaken. The answer so often returned to a report on the supposed sightings of a UFO, that it was the planet Venus, has added to the general popular disbelief in the announcements of specialists. Next to the sun and moon, Venus has always been the most well-known object in the night sky. One of the first questions asked by children when shown the darkened heavens is: “What is that bright star?”

When, in addition, the supposed specialists have on occasion claimed this well-known object to have been the cause of a report and it has been shown that the planet was not above the horizon at the time, one’s doubts of the specialists’ qualifications rise considerably.

In fact the frequent mention of Venus and the recent statement from America that there are about seven hundred reports which they have not been able to explain, convinces me that there is a case to answer. Either there is something to hide, or the authorities are completely stupid; one remembers Bernard Shaw putting into the mouth of a foreign politician: ‘For God’s sake don’t frighten the British.’ Now it should be changed to the ‘Americans’.

For obviously if there are people capable of flying here frequently in large machines from outer space, they would also be advanced enough to flatten America, Russia, China and the whole caboodle had they wished to do so.

The reports on the size of these objects vary very much, but all agree that they are often much larger than the present day aeroplane and that they travel at much greater speed. They can also change their course at right angles to the line of flight which no earthly plane can attempt to do.

Accounts of the lighting of these machines vary considerably. They may appear as silvery discs in daylight or glow with different colours at night. They may also, when seen fairly close at hand, appear to have a ring of windows or ports which emit bright light.

There are a fair number of reports that these machines have been observed to land and also that humanoid figures have been seen to emerge from them. It is doubtful whether any of these reports can be taken at their face value. However it seems possible that some of them may be true.

I rather discount the accounts that observers have talked to persons emerging from these things and messages on the soles of shoes seem most improbable. If any conversations have taken place, which I doubt, they have not been recorded in such a way to carry conviction.

If visitors from elsewhere wished to make contact with people on earth, it does not seem probable that they would do so in American deserts or waste places in Scotland. Since they apparently can operate the machines at far greater speed than any earthly aeroplane, it would be reasonably safe for them to land openly on some civil airfield.

But they have been chased, so the reports go, and apparently attacked, with dire results to the attacker. There seems to be little doubt that these things have been picked up on radar screens and that warplanes have been sent up in pursuit; but whether this has only happened in America is not disclosed.

The term ‘flying saucer’ is not so inaccurate as anyone might suspect. A fair number of photographs appear to show large objects in the sky, not unlike a saucer with a rim facing downwards, but on what should be the base of the saucer there appears to be a small tower and something like a short mast. Seen from below these objects appear as discs and so we come to the description of ‘wheels in the sky’.

There are many reports of these things flying in formation and in quite considerable numbers. By that I mean you might observe eight or ten at a time. There are also reports of giant cylindrical mother ships on which the saucers home and into which they return. As far as I know there are no reports of such things from Britain, although there are several from France. More than one saucer is also not common in this country.

Of course all this rigmarole seems very improbable to many people and quite incomprehensible until this century. But students of the subject have noted that it is nothing new and that there are accounts at various stages of history, which could well be taken to refer to the same type of object.

Pride in the achievements of modern aeronautics and conceit in the intelligence of people on earth make it hard for most to look at all this objectively. For so long a time has humanity been taught that it is the highest product of nature that it is difficult for it now to believe that some other organism somewhere else might be more advanced. But this is not improbable at all. In fact it is more probable than not.

There are a few other significant points. For instance, it is not uncommon for it to be reported that the passing over of a saucer stops the magneto of a car, which in itself suggests some very powerful electronic device in operation.

Then some observers, including policemen in South Wales, have apparently observed a succession of saucers diving into the sea. They were well scolded for their pains!

Other policemen on night patrol in Devon have chased apparent UFOs in fast cars and been told that they were observing planes refuelling in the air. I am sure they did not believe this explanation. Policemen have to be good observers.

There are accounts, too, of filaments of unknown substance falling from these machines and known as ‘angel’s tears’. No one appears to have been able to collect and examine any samples. However ‘angel’s tears’ was the name given by German children to the fine silvery ribbons dropped by our planes during the war to deflect the German radar. I have seen plenty of these ‘angel’s tears’, but do not know of what metal they were composed.

This is a very brief summary of what appears to be known about a very curious subject. There are a host of books available from which the reader can attempt to form his own ideas. However, I think that it must be a very dull-witted person who does not want to know the answer. Is a very large proportion of humanity suffering from delusions or are we really having visitors from outer space? If the second is the right answer, what are they coming for?

The Russians are a hard-headed and incredulous breed, but years ago they let it out that they believed they had found evidence that there had been visitors from outer space. Of course they have also announced that some of their scientists had chased what we should call a Loch Ness Monster in a motor boat. This is another subject which is anathema to our orthodox zoologists.

Nether account may be true. We have no means of checking them. But here is a curious point; if either the Russians or the Americans had any doubt that the things were coming from elsewhere, one would surely have accused the other of infringing their air space. Both must have been having the same kind of visitors, or hallucinations, and they know it.

It is interesting too that both countries are working hard to find out the facts of extra-sensory perception or bio-electronics. They both hope to be able to talk by telepathy to people in rockets on the further side of planets which cannot be reached by radar. In our investigation then we appear to be chasing something which is cloaked in layer upon layer of official secrecy.

However, there is another school of thought with a far more original idea. This school believes that the visitors do not belong to our time at all; but are people living in the future who will have invented machines which are capable of coming back down the ages to see what was going on at a given time. We will now see whether we can conceive any possibility that this might be true.

However we must note that, in the event of it being correct, there is clearly no possibility that people in flying saucers could ever have been thought of as the sons of God or have fathered children on the daughters of men. They could only have been something resembling ghosts to the people in whose ages they appeared, for they would be on a different level of vibration, with no bodily functions comparable to the people they went to investigate. At least this is how the situation would appear to me with my very limited knowledge.

However if we remember what the pendulum has told us of future time and the second level of existence or vibration, there is much to be said in favour of this explanation of the appearance of flying saucers. Interest in the past is very widespread today and appears to be growing. It would be completely fascinating to be able to go back and see exactly what really went on in bygone ages. [2]

The ways that saucers are reported as remaining stationary in the sky for hours at a time is what you would expect if a party was examining a particular place at a particular period of time. The casual way in which only some people see them, while others do not, suggests that they may not be visible to anybody who does not have a high vibrational rate himself. In fact they are future ghosts if this explanation is correct.

We need not boggle at the word ghost. A ghost is something out of its normal earthly time sequence. All recorded television pictures are ghosts. They appear absolutely real on your television screen, but they are not there at all. Neither would this hypothetical type of unknown flying object be real in the sense that your breakfast is real. It would be something completely upsetting to what is called our ‘space time continuum’. But many upsetting things are always happening nowadays, so why not this.

This moving between two levels of existence, however, does not seem to demand any vehicle of transport. Our lady magician, who claimed to visit us in the night, also stated that she often talked with people living on the higher level. I asked her one day whether she could find out from her friends what flying saucers were. A few days later she returned with the answer: ‘They told me that they were made by the back-room boys. I asked them why and they said it was the kind of thing the back-room boys liked to do.’

I have no idea what degree of reliance to put on this statement. But if, by any chance, the saucers were the mechanical toys of experimenters on another level, it would explain why only certain people see them. There is no reason to suppose that men’s mentality would change after reaching the next level. Since everything else, but time, appears to be there, people with a mechanical bent might well experiment in many ways, and only those with a certain degree of psychic ability on this earth level would be able to see the results.

In one way this theory ought to be a considerable encouragement to the numerous people who work themselves into a fret through expectation of the destruction of humanity in an atomic war. If people are coming back from the future to look at us, there can have been no universal destruction before their time.

Still, once again this is not necessarily correct. The visitors need not be coming from the earth plane future. They may be people living on the second plane itself and be what is in earth terms described as dead. Of course if you have a rigid belief that life is confined to one short phase on earth, there is no point thinking about this possibility at all. But this is only a dogma and really the antithesis of any scientific outlook.

You do not know the answer and your belief is on a par with that of the moon being made of blue cheese. It is known that the composition of the moon is rock and not cheese, while such evidence as there is appears to point to the conclusion that life continues to infinity.

If it does, and people continue to live on a higher vibrational level on the next whorl and even on others above that, then presumably they might at times use the intelligences they had brought with them to study the past of the level which they had left.

They are not in the time sequence and not in the earth body, but it might be easier for them to lower their vibrations and even get out of their machines than people from the earth level itself. Have they ever done this? If they did, could they have had real personal contact with the earth humans they met on their trips?

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Legend of the Sons of God (1972) by Tom Lethbridge included in chapters 9 & 10 in The Essential T.C.Lethbridge edited by Tom Graves & Janet Hoult; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1980, ISBN 0 586 05077 9.
[2] Should the construction of such machines become possible, they might well become subject to commercialism. You could hire a seat in a saucer to watch the building of a pyramid or the Battle of Marathon. hey would be of the greatest value in the study of geology and for estimating the probable changes in climate or sea-level. In fact they would be of considerable importance in many ways.

Comments

Sons of God by Tom Lethbridge

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:34:46 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

I had been interested in the problem of who were ‘the sons of God’ for many years and had sought enlightenment from archaeologists, anthropologists and theologians at Cambridge and elsewhere without getting the slightest satisfaction. Nobody knew the answer.

If my ideas had any sense in them, nobody could have known the answer before the present generation, for travel to other planets was unthinkable. Since this has now changed, it is obviously time that people did begin to think about these matters which clearly affect the whole meaning of life on earth. Is there more than one species of Man and is he found on many different planets?

I could not be expected to know the answer, of course, but it is worth throwing a stone into the pool to see what then moves in it. My wife, who is my great helper and best critic as well as carrying the burden of typing it all, seems to think I am not crazy in formulating these ideas and so I will throw the stone and hope for the best.

Let me quote three verses from the sixth chapter of Genesis and see whether anything we have heard of really provides an answer:

'And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives all which they chose.’

That was verses 1 and 2. Then follows verse 3 which seems to have no connection with the first two; and after that verse 4 takes up the story again:

‘There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.’

Now how does this piece of legend fit in with any known ‘ism’? It is not totemism, anthropomorphism or anything of that kind. It is a definite statement of fact that a race known as the sons of God intermarried with another known as the daughters of men. But who were the sons of God? This problem has puzzled me for years and I have met no one who can supply an answer.

There is the same kind of thing in Greek mythology where one race is apparently described as Gods. They have unions with mortal women and produce heroes. One finds it, too, in the northern lands. Many of our early Anglo-Saxon kings claimed to be descended from Woden, the same Odin of the Norsemen, who was the equivalent of the Greek Zeus, the chief of the gods.

Let us forget such terms as polytheism and see whether there is any other explanation which might fit this seemingly impossible situation. After all there are many people who believe that every word in the Bible is true and to them the sons of God must mean, not only that God had children, but that He also had a wife.

When I first thought abut this matter, it seemed obvious that the sons of God must have been some conquering race who thought a lot of themselves and to whom it was at first unthinkable that they should actually intermarry with the people they conquered.

The whole caste system was apparently based on such a situation. The race, formerly known as Aryans and now generally spoken of as Indo-Europeans, thought it sinful to mix their blood with that of the people they had vanquished. But they had gods of their own. If they had been or believed themselves of divine descent, they would have surely been called the ‘children of the gods’. Aryan appears to mean ‘noble’ and nothing more.

This problem is not entirely foreign to us in England. Very large numbers of people are known to have descended from Edward III. Edward III was descended in blood from Alfred. Alfred claimed descent from Woden. Are all these people then entitled to put ‘son of God’ after their name?

Of course, it sounds ridiculous when said like that but, funny or not, it is interesting to wonder whether they might be. Who was Woden anyway? Was he just the wandering chief of a barbarous war band, or was he something else?

So much difficulty lies in the meaning of words. A god to ancient Romans could be simply an outstanding man and he could be deified in his lifetime. We all know the unpleasant results of this process when Herod was hailed as a god by the populace! The practice of calling Roman emperors gods is also well known. It may appear strange to those who hold that the term only refers to the creator of the universe, but as a matter of historical fact it needs to be considered.

It is even more strange to find that the term ‘devil’ is simply a distortion of a word meaning ‘god’. The gods of one religious belief became the devils of another. Lucifer, the light bearer, a god to many races (including the Celts, who called him Lugh), was also the wicked angel who was thrown out of heaven.

Perhaps it is even more peculiar to learn that the original holder of the Greek title was the planet Venus and so female. Lucifer, Satan, devil, the dragon and the serpent all came to mean the spirit of evil, not only in the Christian world but in many others also, which brings us to the second curious puzzle: What was the war in heaven?

Unless the meaning is very obscure, I far prefer the language of the old James I Bible to that of the modern ‘told to the children’ versions and I think that there is nothing obscure in the following quotations which all bear on the same subject. The first is from Revelations, chapter 12, verses 7 to 9 and is the most complete statement of what was evidently, at the time of Nero, a very ancient legend.

‘And there was war in heaven; Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, and prevailed not; neither was there place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called e Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world; he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.’

Also in St Luke, chapter 10, verse 18, Jesus himself is reported as quoting: ‘I beheld Satan as lightning fall from the heaven.’ These are not unique survivals in old Hebrew writings, for something similar is preserved by the Hindus, while the serpent or dragon is even found in old Norse mythology. There was a story spread widely in the ancient world that there had been a war in heaven and the vanquished side had been driven to live on earth.

Of course it is possible to reject anything of this sort as pure imagination by men long ago seeking for an explanation of the reason for the conflict between good and evil. In almost every ancient religion of which we have record there is this story of conflict between the powers of light and darkness.

The ancient Greeks did not have it, but then their gods were quite frankly ‘not respectable’ in a Christian sense; neither were those of the Romans, Saxons, Norsemen or Celts. These had all the vices as well as many of the virtues of mankind. They were simply men and women with greatly enlarged powers.

If we take the view that all legends of this kind are no more than fiction, there is no point in going on with this study; but as the years go by, it becomes increasingly clear that many, if not all, have some foundation in fact. They may be greatly embroidered and appear as fairy stories, but there is something in them based on memories of events which really happen.

They are not the same as myths, which are the counterparts of religious ritual; although these themselves often contain genuine pieces of tradition. The long labours of Sir James Frazer which resulted in that ponderous series of books known as The Golden Bough brought this home to many readers. Tradition itself tells that he was locked up in his study for many hours a day by his ferocious French wife to compel him to write his daily quota. Certainly he seemed to wear a haunted look.

I am going to take it for granted that there was some truth at the back of the two scraps of legend which I have quoted and see whether we can find anything to suggest an explanation. It is a kind of exercise in detection, but it is not fiction. The guesses may be wrong, yet there is something to be investigated.

Our questions then are: Who were the sons of God? And what was the war in heaven?

If anybody reads the early chapters of Genesis with care, it becomes clear that some editor has linked together at least two traditional accounts of the Creation with remarkably little skill. The Adam and Eve story is the kind of thing you might find in the religious beliefs of an African tribe today and we need not bother with it yet. However the other, which in itself looks like a blend of more than one tale, has a lot of legend in it.

At the very start of this we meet another puzzle in Chapter 1, verse 26: ‘And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.’ Who did God say this to? We have always been led to understand that there was only one God and that He was absolute. He created everything from millions of nebulae and bacteria. Yet in the chief religious book of the early Hebrews he is pictured as talking to other of like form. Were they perhaps the sons of God? One can hardly assume that He was talking to Himself.

It is even more remarkable when we find a similar kind of story preserved on the other side of the Atlantic. There several descendants of God are reported as having more than one trial at making man like themselves. There were also failures of the same kind as described in Genesis. This is some world-wide traditional story and not confined to the Hebrews. It seems most unlikely that it is more than some ancient theory, but at the same time we must observe that it had once a very wide distribution. How was it spread from one continent to another before the days of efficient ships? There is a puzzle here which is not just a bee in my bonnet.

The question of who the Sons of God might have been is bound up somehow with the evidence for an extraordinary spread of people all up the western seaboard of Europe who put up a very great number of large upright stones for some apparently inexplicable reason. Single ones are perhaps not of very great interest, for they might mark the site where someone had been killed, or be the boundary between two different communities.

But when you find great rings and lines of stones set up in Brittany, Cornwall, Wiltshire, Ireland, the Outer Hebrides and the Orkneys, it surely means something of vast importance to the people who put them up. No one has the least idea why great rows of stones were set striding across Dartmoor, or why a huge ring was erected at Stennis in Orkney.

Only one thing is obvious and that is that a race of seamen must have done it for an important purpose. Why do seamen put up marks? As far as I know it is only for one purpose and that is to show themselves or other seafarers how to get to some place in safety. But many of these indicators are far inland and could not be seen from the sea at all. Although the suggestion may seem fantastic, could it possibly be that they were meant to be seen from the air?

No, I am not crazy, but although I have had no personal experience of the matter, I cannot fail to be impressed by the bulk of testimony that unidentified flying vehicles are frequently observed in our skies. Could it be that, in the Bronze Age, and before, they were also numerous and needed direction points?

Let us go back to the ancient Greek gods. Till the second half of this century, it would have been quite absurd to suggest that there might have been some truth in the flying chariots which the gods possessed and the thunderbolts which Zeus threw. Furthermore it would have been ridiculous to think that these gods might have come from an unknown part of the universe and sometimes begotten children on women of the earth.

It is no longer absurd - clumsy though our efforts may appear to be, man is already starting on his first tentative exploration of other planets and is there any reason to be sure that he is the first race to do so? Obviously the answer is ‘no’. We have really very little idea of what may go on in outer space and it is an impertinence to think that man on Earth is the most advanced of all creation.

The Greek gods passed with great rapidity from their home on Mount Olympus to anywhere they wanted to go and if they were said to go in flying chariots, this only described the fastest things that man had by that time invented. It was all rather fantastic and even a little comical, but why did men believe anything of the sort unless sometime, somewhere, something of a vague resemblance to this picture had once existed?

It was not only a product of Greek imagination, for there were Hindu stories too, of godlike personages who actually had remarkable flying machines and destructive weapons. Nobody knew how they worked, of course, and it was all long ago. So was the chariot of fire, which took Elijah up into the heavens.

I do not believe all this, of course, for there is very little to go on; but I do think that there is enough to make us wonder whether there is a possibility that for a short period long ago there may have been visitors to this earth from another and that they were so relatively advanced in technology as to be completely bewildering to the earth men of those days.

If there were visitors of this kind, it is more than likely that they would need landing signs here and there. Supposing that they were beginning to investigate an unexplored world, which was completely unmapped and they were putting down a few parties of explorers, it would be necessary to have indications where these parties had been dropped. What would be more natural than to enlist native help to set up such marks?

It is hard for us today to visualize the Britain of, for instance, five thousand years ago. The vast extent of natural woodland is unknown today, except in tropical vegetation. Brambles and fallen trees made pathways through it extremely difficult and it covered the bulk of the country. Only on some downlands was passage relatively easy and that was not free from large patches of juniper trees, thorn bushes, gorse and bramble.

The wide vista of rolling grassland did not exist. One can assume that exploration parties would be dropped at the edges of all this and traces of them would be found, if at all, in the kind of situations where we do find these stone set rings and alignments today. A stone ring would be noticeable from the air, just because such things do not often happen in nature. Neither would straight lines be frequent.

But there may have been another reason for setting up the stones, even if its object were the same. For untold generations it has been believed, especially by the devotees of the old witch religion, that by means of exciting people to execute wild circular dances, power could be generated and stored in stone and trees.

Actually this appears to be scientific fact. It has been demonstrated by Mr P Callahan in America that moths generate bio-electricity by the heat caused by the movements of their wings and they use this to locate their mates or food supply. I have described how I detected the same thing with beetles in an earlier part of this book. This is observed fact and no longer something on the fringe of knowledge.

Now if you have a large number of people dancing wildly round in a ring, you obviously generate a great deal of this bio-electricity, living electricity. If you carry out this performance in rings formed of stones with gaps between them, you have a form of dynamo.

It has been shown that the electro-magnetic fields of stones, trees and water will absorb bio-electricity from outside and this is the probable reason why some people see ghosts in situations which were favourable to such impressions being preserved. I have elsewhere suggested the names of oread fields for those of stones, dryad fields for those of trees and naiad fields for those of streams in accordance with the Greek belief that nymphs with these names were to be found in such places.

We now apparently see why my wife and I experienced electric shocks when trying to date the stones of the circle of the Merry Maidens in Cornwall. The bio-electronic force has been stored at one time by the exertion of dancers in that circle and it had never been taken out again. The circle is still complete. But why did anybody wish to store up electronic power in such places? What possible use could it be put to?

Well, experiments with the pendulum have shown that the electronic fields about an object are double cones of limitless height and depth. It has also been shown that a pendulum length of the same radius as the base of the double cones ill register contact with that cone.

If, then, you had an apparatus in a flying machine set to the right wave-length, you could pick up the rays from the stored energy in the stones and home in on it like the moth to its mate. These rings of stones could have been used both as visible and invisible navigational beacons.

This suggestion sounds absurd to those who have got no further than believing that the stones were set up by shaggy and uncultured savages whose only aids to life were stone tools and soft, badly baked pottery. But what if there were two completely different races of people involved, the sons of God and the daughters of men?

Of course, I may well be talking complete rubbish, but before the reader dismisses it as such, perhaps he will tell me why the stones were set up at all. In the whole of western Europe, it used to be done and in the same area the excited ring dances were once commonplace. No one can give a reason for either.

When explorers get up tributaries of the Amazon, they find the naked women of unknown tribes dancing in exciting rings in forest glades. It is no answer to say that primitive man does this as a primitive religious rite and you did it in a sacred circle of stones or trees to make it more religious.

Or children do it naturally and so it is a natural form of worship. But do any children do it unless they are first taught by some elder who has herself been taught as a child?

What were the dances of Baal which so upset the Hebrew prophets? The Baalim were little stone jujus of the gods and the people danced before them to put power into the stones. The One God, Yahweh, was not supposed to like it.

It was not only the Hebrew prophets who had this trouble. If you read the Koran of the Moslems, you find that Mahomet had the same difficulty with numerous godlings. We may think perhaps that these Baalim represented the sons of God, but with the passage of time nobody really remembered what that meant.

As a purely hypothetical exercise then, let us put up a probably absurd problem. Was there a long time ago, perhaps five thousand or more years it might have been, a series of exploratory visits to this world from another? Did they have considerable contact with the people then living on earth, including some degree of intermarriage?

Did the explorers persuade the natives to help them in setting up direction beacons and similar constructions in return for being taught how to work metals, practise agriculture and even build primitive towns? Then, for some unknown reason, did it all come to an end, leaving some degree of hybrid population behind it? Were the visitors known as the sons of God, because they had a belief in a single deity?

I think it is impossible to imagine a large immigration of people from elsewhere. Had there been anything of the sort and had settlements been formed of foreigners, it seems impossible for no trace of them to have come to light. So much digging and construction work has been done that some totally unknown culture of objects must have emerged somewhere for the acute bewilderment of archaeologists. This has not happened.

There are stories published of a very few unknown things being found in rocks, but until I see a numerous collection of such things I shall not believe it. Archaeological study is really quite advanced and I think we can say with confidence that no such foreign culture has come to light.

You may say that Atlantis, Mu and even Tartessos have not yet been found and I say we have no vestige anywhere of any Atlantian culture, which must have existed, other than on the drowned lands, if there had been one. The Atlantis at present claimed at the eastern end of the Mediterranean cannot be right, because Atlantis was outside the Pillars of Hercules, that is west of Gibraltar.

If it existed at all, one would have thought that the shoals off Cape Trafalgar might mark its grave. Yet the only unexpected things dredged from the bottom of nearby Cadiz harbour are Irish bronzes, and Irish goldwork has been found as far away as Palestine while Greek and Egyptian ornaments have been found in Bronze Age graves in Britain. People got about the world all right in those far off days, so where are the traces of the Atlantians who are said to have been so far advanced that they had flying machines?

Perhaps, however, Atlantis was just another explorers’ base and quite small. If so, there might be very little to find except the equivalent of the empty bully beef tins of the explorers of my day. At least we buried these out of a sense of decency, now lacking in the bulk of our population, even in the wastes of Jan Mayen or Baffin Land.

This investigation becomes more and more complicated as it goes on. Nothing seems to have an obvious answer and yet all sorts of books are written and hundreds of lectures given about this very period, none of which gives us much hint of the astonishing things which have taken place in a raw, new world some five thousand years ago.

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Legend of the Sons of God (1972) by Tom Lethbridge included as Chapter 9 in The Essential T.C.Lethbridge edited by Tom Graves & Janet Hoult; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1980, ISBN 0 586 05077 9.

Comments

Our Great Dilemma by Tom Lethbridge

Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:00:53 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1976 [1]

Perhaps I could have called this book ‘Our Great Problem’ or, better still, refrained from writing it at all. The word ‘dilemma’ is really the right one, for it implies that whatever path we choose, we are liable to risk being hurt. Not only have we to try to solve a problem; but we have then to arrange our subsequent actions in accordance with this solution.

The problem is this: do we live in a planned life in a created universe; or is the whole thing a matter of chance? It must be one or the other. Either the ingredients for life were deliberately prepared for it, or it all happened by accident. [2]

This is where the horns of the dilemma come in, for if we decide that it was deliberately prepared, we are clearly under an obligation to make the best of it, employing as a guide an indefinable element known as ‘conscience’. If we decide it is all chance, then there is no point in acting in any other way than that which appears to offer jus the most pleasure. It is a matter of observed fact that either course may land us on one or other of the dilemma’s sharp horns.

Somewhere, I suppose, there is an ancient word picture, or even a drawing, of a dilemma; but it does not happen to be familiar with me. Perhaps the nearest ancient drawing of this kind of thing is the well-known Dark Ages one in the Vienna Gospels of a devil appearing to St Cuthbert, but this apparition has no horns and is not worth illustrating here. We do not know how a dilemma appeared to those who invented the term for use in logic long ago. I imagine it as a small, dark, shaggy, bull-like creature, with what the Americans call a ‘mean’ expression in its little, red, piggy eyes, and with sharp, forward-curving horns.

For thousand of years there appears to have been no question of our problem ever arising. In general man, according to Christian teaching, may have been heathen; but he did believe in superior entities who had created the Universe, the earth, the animals and mankind itself.

Christianity, Sufi, Buddhism, Brahmanism, Muhammadism and the rest were really just sects of one belief in a Universal Creator. The dogmas which arose and the wars between conflicting ideas were about relatively small matters compared with that which has come upon us now.

The bulk of Western man today, if he can be bothered to think about it at all, favours the idea that everything happens by chance. It is no good for professionals of religion to tell their flock that they must have faith. The flock just has not got it and it disregards most of the dogma. They ask how God can possibly be Love when such frightful things happen to them.

I should be inclined to this belief myself, had not another possible explanation come my way. Since it has come, it is obviously a matter of duty to set it out for others to examine and think about. My ideas may well be wrong; but I do not think that they can be so conflicting with observed fact as is the theory of chance.

As a matter of interest, variants of ideas like mine are held by many people all over the world; but relatively few are prepared to write things which can lead others to regard them as crazy. It is perfectly fair. Many regard Darwinian Evolutionists as too simple to be allowed loose on humanity; but few dare to put this on paper.

A theory has become a dogma and this is kept alive by faith. To shift a dogma of this kind may take hundreds of years. Millions of children have been taught that all living animals have evolved from lumps of jelly in the sea, and why should they doubt it? Actually the idea is apparently already out of date and discarded; but the belief in it will go on.

The amoeba theory will take years to replace, for it has become a kind of religious belief. What was Voltaire’s remark on this kind of thing? I forget the exact words but translated they went something like this: ‘Religion is a series of inhibitions, which prevents a man from making full use of his intelligence.’ Of course this is only true of dogma.

Belief in Darwinian Evolution has reached this dogma stage. Darwin did not wish it but his enthusiastic followers overrode him. It is very difficult now even to discuss the possibility that it might be wrong. It is on this Evolution theory, which is not even supported by the fossils in the more ancient rocks that the whole idea of the development of the Universe by Chance rests.

The alternative is that the Universe was deliberately planned and created by an entity known as God. This cannot be proved either. Both beliefs are kept going by faith. Is there any way of finding out which idea is the more probable? For it is widely apparent that there is something wrong with the leadership of both ways of thinking.

There is another method of trying to solve our dilemma, which is the one we will try to use. If it could be satisfactorily demonstrated, both the other ideas could be combined. There would no longer be a gulf between science and religion; although this closing of the gap would certainly not be popular with some of the professionals of both groups.

I do not know whether I can present the facts in a readable manner and I know that I am certainly not the proper person to make the attempt; but , since nobody else appears to be doing so, I am prepared to try, even if it earns me nothing but contempt. At least I have spent a dozen years in practical efforts to find out the answer.

It is easy to say to oneself that there are these two views and it really does not matter very much which one is right. What can we do about it anyway? But it does matter, because, if the dogma of chance is established, there is nothing to prevent a rule of complete selfishness and greed overwhelming the world. The most ruthless people will come to the top and reign as dictators. The remainder will do what they are told to do.

The great example of this is Russia, where the patron saint, Karl Marx, built up his theory on that of Darwin. But we have not sunk as low as this yet and are hardly likely to accept as a paragon of virtue a man who was habitually hit over the head by his wife with a rolling pin. Yet the theory does corrupt and in the hands of clever men can cause great damage by its influence.

That in brief is one side of the picture. The other is of the church’s long rearguard action. Now and then attempts are made to update the theories which first took root well over a thousand years ago. The difficulty appears to be that, while the congregation is desperately willing to know whether there is such a thing as God, their teachers spend their time in telling them what God wants them to do.

Naturally enough the congregation would like to know how they came by this knowledge. They must have faith, they are told. Where do you obtain this commodity? God is Love they are told, and on looking about they can see very little sign of it.

To the outside observer neither faith seems to be correct. Somewhere between the two, or perhaps entirely independent of either, there must be a third. Although it may seem a very impertinent quest, I see no valid reason why we should not try to find it. We are provided with a thinking mechanism. Why not use it?

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapter 1 in The Power of the Pendulum; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1976, ISBN 1-85063-003-8.
[2] In 1976, in Chapter 7 of The Power of the Pendulum Lethbridge remarked that ‘there can never have been many trained thinkers at any one time in ancient days, yet it is extraordinary how far they got with their thinking. Indeed it seems possible to me that the germs of their knowledge came in the first instance from outside this planet.’ [Ed]

Comments

The Life Planners by Tom Lethbridge

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:21:08 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

Some six hundred years had passed since the Life of Christ when Paulinus taught Christianity to the Northumbrians. In that long period Christian beliefs had been the subject of much debate and acrimony. Dogmas had been formulated and refuted and others had taken their place. Emperors had been converted and another had given it up in disgust and reverted to paganism. Whole sects, like the Gnostics, had been subjugated and their books destroyed. Beliefs held in reincarnation had been taught and then declared anathema.

What sort of Christianity did Paulinus teach? According to Bede this included the doctrine of Everlasting Life, Salvation and Eternal Happiness. However, we can feel certain that a belief in miracles was also taught, for when Oswald, who succeeded Edwin after a brief interlude in AD 635, was killed in battle by the pagans, acts of miraculous healing were said to have taken place not only by touching his remains, but at the spot where he was slain. After all, a great part of the Gospels is taken up by reports of miraculous healing.

It seems to be the fashion now to doubt the miracles recorded in the Gospels; but if these are explained away, what is left? When Christ was asked by the disciples of John the Baptist if He was He that should come, He replied with a list of miracles which He had performed.

The only creed of the earliest Christians was to say that they believed in Christ. Even in Paulinus’ day the creed was half the length it is now and apparent impossibilities like the ‘resurrection of the body’ were not in it. The whole belief of the original Christians seems therefore to have been confined by what is now contained in the Gospels, nothing else.

The theories of St. Paul and other apostles were not in it and certainly not many of the dogmas which have grown up since. There was nothing about the equality of Christ with His Father, a dogma that split the Greek church from that of Rome. There was little doubt about Christ being God. Indeed He said that he was Son of His Father, but He also said that other men were too.

It seems that you can be a perfectly good Christian and yet believe in nothing which is not stated in the Gospels. But you must believe in miracles, or, as we would say in our study, you must believe in Extra Sensory Perception. It is as simple as that. You have to accept a force which is not in the scientific text books. If you see and believe that there is this force, that is ‘the grain of mustard seed’ of the parable, nothing in the Gospels is any longer scientifically improbable. All follow laws of nature as yet uncodified.

We have I think ample evidence that this force exists. However, it is outside time and distance. It is probably incorrect to call it fourth-dimensional as I am liable to do. It seems in fact to be non-dimensional. Extra Sensory Perception works by means of a non-dimensional force and it works in other planes beyond the three-dimensional plane of earth. If you can learn how to use this force, you can work miracles.

In an extremely small way we do work miracles by using the pendulum. Our step in the dark appears to be one into the light. What can we infer from this hotch-potch of scraps and snippets drawn from many sources? I have always fished with a net of narrow mesh. My clues are small, but they are becoming very numerous. They are also almost entirely ones which result from our own experiment and observation carried out over a period of years.

If you add them all together you begin to see that man is something very different from the pictures drawn for us by three-dimensional science. He is not just a semi-animal resulting from aeons of chance evolution of millions of living cells.

All the evidence goes to show that these cells, each of which is in reality a living entity of its own, have not been put together by chance. Their arrangement is the result of a carefully prepared plan. The whole thing was worked out, apparently though a process of trial and error, which took no time at all, on the next plane to Earth.

Into this association of cells was put something quite distinct from it. This something was it seems an extension of what we may call a mind, or a soul, whose real dwelling place was on a plane above the Earth plane. We say above, but this really conveys no location in space; it is only a term to indicate a higher rate of vibration.

The two portions of one mind, or personality, are nearly cut off from one another owing to the refracting effect between the two whorls of the spiral. This is necessary, for the detached piece of mind is evidently located in its earth body to gain experience from life in a denser medium. It is an adventurer and explorer.

All that it learns can eventually be taken back to the parent mind. Of course if it becomes completely absorbed in animal matters, it learns nothing at all and the experiment is a failure. As far as one can see, a very large proportion of the experiments are failures. Presumably, however, since no time is involved on the higher plane, the parent mind can take its experimental portion when its body dies and send it out again. This would be reincarnation and the evidence as a whole, collected by other research workers seems to show that this does take place. The object of the whole exercise is surely the evolution of the mind on the higher plane.

There is obviously a Boss above, controlling the mind, and it seems reasonable to assume that there is a whole heavenly hierarchy. But it is also probable that messages from minds on Earth get no farther than contact with the individual’s own parent mind. If they do go beyond this, they would be passed on by the parent mind itself.

Elsewhere I once compared a life on earth to a cinema film, which a given mind was compelled to watch. This comparison can of course be only partly true. But if it is only partly true, then our main mind on the higher plane can unroll the reel of film and see what happens before and after the actual event as it appears to us.

If, by use of the unknown force, with or without some such mechanical aid as the pendulum, we can get through the refracting zone and contact our real self, then information is available to the earthly mind, which is quite outside the reactions of the five ordinary senses.

Perhaps in a way this is cheating, but it is not supernatural and it is making use of powers which are available to a large number of us. As Dunne pointed out, however, such interference may alter the chain of events depicted on the films. Our true self knows what will happen to its projected child in its earth-body; but if that child takes independent action on its own, the predicted course may be to some extent deflected.

This is surely the reason why prophecy, although in some cases correct, is in others widely wrong. Even Christ apparently predicted disasters, comparable to an atomic war, with an error of many hundreds of years in the date. It is this problem of time which is so very hard for us to understand.

With life on earth, time runs in a continuous stream from the earliest geological phase to the present day. Effect must always follow cause in the three-dimensional world. In the non-dimensional world it is not so. Yet the non-dimensional world is linked to the world we know.

When we try to find a rate for time on the first whorl of the pendulum’s spiral, it cannot be done. At least I cannot find a time rate. But I can find it on the second whorl. It is 60. That is 20 plus 40. This is quite a shock. We know that there is time in our three-dimensional world; although it may be of a different order for every living species. Why therefore does the pendulum behave as if it did not exist?

It took me some time to think this problem out, but the answer seems to be relatively simple. The pendulum gives is answers by the gyrational change in its movement. Some obstruction causes a block in the free flow of current and the swing of the pendulum is forced back and into a circle. With every concept we have tried except time this is the case. But there is no block with time in the three-dimensional world. It is running away ceaselessly.

In the next phase, however, we have reason to think that it does not move in this manner. I have said that there is no time on the next plane, but this may well be incorrect. We can find a rate for it and so it presumably exists. But it is something quite different to the time we know.

It is impossible for us to grasp the implications of a world of that sort, for we are not designed to do so. But there are people, sensitives, or mediums, who do appreciate things in this way. They foresee future events as clearly as if they were seeing them with their eyes. However, many of them appear to be lost in earth time and do not know whether an event has happened yet or not.

In the three-dimensional world of nature, time is of great importance. The most important case from our point of view is the development and growth of a baby. Here the whole organism has to change from one living in the airless dark into one living in light and breathing air. Enormous numbers of its living cells have to develop for these functions according to an exact plan and timetable. If anything goes wrong with this scheme, the baby cannot live and breathe.

But this is a prearranged plan. How can there be a plan without a planner? It is difficult to see how this point so frequently evades the attention of otherwise most brilliant men. So firm is the grip of the dogma of Darwinian Evolution on their whole outlook that they cannot bear to visualize the planner.

umed that there was a planner. He has been conveniently dropped out by later scientists. All sorts of clever ideas are put forward to try to show how the multitude of dividing and living cells in the baby know where and how to develop. No idea carries conviction, however many letters there may be after the author’s name.

You cannot expect the cells of Bolboceras arminger to develop into legs, wings, eyes, internal organs and so on without a plan to work to. Without a plan how can it change from an egg into a grub, from a grub to a chrysalis and from a chrysalis to a perfect flying insect? How can you produce an insect’s complicated wing by any chance development? It cannot start from a flapping leg gradually growing membrane. Besides, it comes from a different place. There can be no Darwinian evolution of an insect’s wing.

All through the evolutionary story, as told in the study of geology, it is evident to anyone with a mind unclouded by dogma that some entity was experimenting along many lines and with varied success. The experimenter was not infallible anymore than the designer of aeroplanes is infallible.

Many experimental animals were evolved which vanished from one cause or another. Each was evolved by improving on the one before, but it did not evolve itself. Someone made use of known laws and known material, each cell being a living and reproducing unit, to improve the design. But some main designs could not be developed far enough. The plan was then abandoned and a new one tried out.

The evidence for the existence of a planner or planners is clear for all to see. But there is not the slightest evidence to suggest whose mind, or minds, does the planning. There may well be very many planners in an ascending order up to the one who planned the whole universe. Who that is is quite beyond our comprehension and the problem is no concern of this study. But if we admit that there is a plan and a planner, surely our study does throw some light on this plan. The careful arrangement of the rates on our circular card can hardly be a matter of chance. Take just the four cardinal points on it again.

Why should Sun, Light, Red, Fire and East, each with a rate of 10-inches, come opposite to Moon, Sound, Green, Water and West at 30-inches? They might have been scattered anywhere around our forty-divisional disc. Why does Heat not come under 10-inches with Fire? The answer is that it is associated with Life at 20-inches and nothing could live without it.

But to those, who like myself do some painting in water colour, the question which at once comes to the fore is why is Green opposite Red? For years I have mixed blue and yellow to make green. Blue and yellow are primary colours so we were taught, green is not.

But green and not blue is the colour of chlorophyll, without which most of the vegetable world could not live. It is of primary importance. It is also far more easy for man’s eyes to see. If a vessel’s starboard light were blue and not green there would be many more collisions at sea. Once more we have to go back to the beginning to look at things afresh. To the planner green is the important colour, blue is not.

Then take the cardinal points themselves, the North, South, East and West. They are not the points of the Earth’s magnetic field, but those of the Earth itself. Magnetic North moves about in an area of Arctic Canada. Its bearing from Southern England changes about 15 seconds a year and it is far from the North Pole.

The North Pole itself has been relatively steady for much of man’s history; although this was not always so and what would happen if the Polar Ice caps melted is anybody’s guess. But compared with the magnetic pole it is fixed and immutable. There it is in a waste of frozen waters where there is no sun for half a year.

We find North at 40-inches along with Cold, Death and Black, the beginning and end of our scale, 0 as well as 40. For it is the beginning of the next whorl of the spiral. The Sun rises as a Red Ball of Fire in the East, all three on the same rate of 10-inches. It sets in the West at 30-inches and at its setting there is the phenomenon of the Green ray, or Flash, which, although few of us have seen it, is a natural phenomenon.

With the setting of the Sun the Moon takes over. All this is so elementary and obvious that one would have thought that a human living on Earth might have devised it. In fact a mind comparable to a human mind must have done so.

But is not our Earth mind simply a projection of our higher mind and is not this itself presumably a projection from one still higher? It looks like an indication that all mind works in a similar manner. The planner made his plan in much the same way as we might have set about it ourselves.

The ancient Biblical story of God saying: ‘Let us make man in Our Own Image’ has some sense in it after all. But God of this story said this to other planners. He was not doing it in isolation. On that particular level, which was thought to have planned man, there was still no ultimate Almighty. Just as Paulinus’ teaching appealed to the common sense of Edwin’s intelligent councillors, [2] so we, surrounded by so much scientific fact that it tends to become a bore, can begin to catch a gleam of truth from our unorthodox study.

We have built up our ideas very slowly from a long series of apparently trivial experiments, which are open to anyone who can work the pendulum, and most people can do so, to test for themselves. Several people have already written to me in confirmation. They get the same rates as we do. But, although we trust our observations, we are little qualified to reason from them and there may be numerous errors in our conclusions. Each person must draw his own conclusions if not from his own observations, at least from a confidence in ours.

The issues are of vital importance to everybody. They are those of whether our minds and personalities are temporary and perish with the brain, or if they survive death and the disappearance of the brain. The former belief leads to every kind of greed and selfishness. There can be no hope for a stable, happy world as long as this creed of materialism holds sway.

All we have learnt from our experiments tends to refute the materialistic belief. It tends to show very clearly that a part of our mind is not bounded by the earthly three-dimensional bonds of time and space. It also knows far more than does our Earthly one. Yet the two portions of mind are linked, although prevented from close co-operation by something comparable to the refracting layer between air and water.

Everything we know in our Earth life appears to continue on the next, but there are certainly additions. The biconical fields of force with which every fragment of matter seems to be surrounded, are evidently perceptible to our other mind. It can single them out with no difficulty and pass back the knowledge to us by the simple pendulum contrivance. The miracle of this world is the commonplace of the next.

To understand why this should be so, it is necessary to see if we can appreciate a little of what the pendulum has been telling us about our mind (or is it our spirit?) beyond the 40-inch rate. It has told us that this mind, as I shall continue to call it for convenience, can sense things hidden from us by a veil of matter whether they are beneath a layer of soil or behind a stone wall. It can also jump across thousands of years of our time and do this both forwards and backwards.

It has a further qualification which is quite beyond our earthly conceptions, for it can apparently appreciate objects in two places at once. Now the faster anything moves the closer it becomes to being in two places at the same time. If it moved at an infinite speed it would be in all places at once and appear to be at rest.

We can surely infer therefore that, to our mind beyond our earth life, things move very much faster than they do here. Everything, including ourselves, vibrates much faster on the next plane than it does on Earth. Green is still green and red red, but it is probably more intensely green or more vividly red.

Owing to this greatly increased rate of vibration, things which are solid and impenetrable to us are no longer so on the higher plane. Someone on this higher plane would be able to pass through the solid obstructions of Earth with as great ease as television vibrations pass through walls of houses or steel decks. This is more than half-way to understanding the mysteries we have been trying to investigate.

Solids on the next plane are vibrating so fast that we cannot sense them at all, but they are solid enough to the individual on the next level. Just as everything is now known to be in constant movement here, so it is on the higher plane. The only difference is the speed at which things move. There is nothing unnatural about the next level. Things simply move too fast for us on Earth to sense them.

Endnotes

[1] Source: first half (pages 136-146) of the final chapter (11) of A Step in the Dark; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1967, ISBN 07100 1741 3.
[2] This story is told in Chapter 22: Saxon Britain. [Ed]

Comments

The Life Eternal by Tom Lethbridge

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:38:05 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

To understand at all what is happening, it is necessary to take another look at what has been learnt about the rates. I have mentioned already how they can all be plotted on a circular diagram of 40 divisions. On this circular card north (40) is at the top together with death, cold, anger, sleep, black and so on. South is at the bottom with east, red on its right (10) and west, green (30) on its left. Round the circumference of the circle all the other rates lie according to their numbers. Some, such as the rate for psychic ability, which I call the psi rate (9½), are fractional. Copper is 30½, with blue and cobalt, and mercury 12½.

There are so many names now that I cannot construct a complete diagram which would print clearly. There is one in my last book, A Step in the Dark, but even that is not very clear. Therefore I have been content with diagrams illustrating various groups of ideas. Now several ancient religions appear to have hit on something resembling this circular plan. Someone, a long time ago, did a lot of work and knew a lot about this subject. In the lore of the druids, alchemists, gnostics, witches and so on, as well as in our own folklore, there are signs that once a great deal had been discovered.

And in the teaching of the Buddhists of Tibet great stress is laid on ‘the wheel of life’, and on the ‘four quarters and ten directions’. The Tibetans have of course studied this subject with great thoroughness in their own way. While we try to approach it along the path of science, their method is entirely mental and their aids are not instruments but contemplation.

Relationship with colours. Rates in inches. I have not included north, south, east and west in this diagram, but of course north is at the top and is true, not magnetic, north.

It is interesting then to see that they place seven colours in the halo of Buddha. Excluding black, white and grey, which are hardly colours, we have the rates for seven as well: brown (7), purple (9), red (10), yellow (29), green (30) and blue (30½). These are not the primary colours of the artist, who believes green to be a compound of yellow and blue, but are primary colours in nature. Orange (12) makes seven. [2]

Now it is possible to arrange all these rates in another way. You can take your circle arranged in spokes, and mark the length of each rate up from the hub along its appropriate line. The resulting picture is an Archimedean spiral ending at 40.

Each dot, which, when joined to the others next to it, forms part of the spiral, is in reality the central point of the base of a double cone at right angles to the plane of the original circle. The circumference of the base of the cones cuts the point at which the observer stands.

Since the points 40, 10, 20 and 30 can be shown to be oriented to the true as opposed to the magnetic points of the compass, it is clear that the rays from even the smallest objects proceed outwards at right angles to the surface of the earth. But a far more important point is apparent.

The spiral cannot possibly end dead at 40. The spiral must go on, and this is what the Buddhists believe and teach. Their wheel recurs for ever unless you can get free from it.

It is quite easy to show with the pendulum that our spiral of rates also continues. It passes the point of death at 40 and repeats the rates exactly as they were before, but with 40 added to their number. Purple is thus 9 + 40, or male is 24 + 40.

However there is one great difference. The central point of each double cone has shifted. You can thus place a material object on the floor and find a circle around it. The object is there for you to see, touch or smell. But there is also a mock position for that object and round that position you can find a circle with the original rate and a new rate with 40 added to it.

You cannot perceive the object in its second position by any of the five senses. However you can find it there with the pendulum. It exists in another plane. The whole range of mental ideas exist in another plane beyond the rate for death. But there are exceptions and they have a bearing on what we have been talking about.

You cannot find a rate for time on the first whorl of the spiral. This is presumably because time is always passing here and you cannot pin it down with the pendulum. On the second whorl, beyond the rate for death, you can find a rate for time. It appears to be static, although this is beyond our comprehension. It is the same as the second whorl’s rate for life, 20 + 40.

In other words, if you happen to pass the point of death and are living on the second whorl, it takes no time to do anything you want to do. If that is so, anyone engaged in creating a species has only to draw up his design and he can then put it through all its evolutionary stages at once.

Diagrams of examples of rates, in inches, from two levels on the spiral. A is the normal ‘earth’ level and has no rate for time because this is moving away and affords no obstruction to rays sent from the pendulum. Time appears to be static in B, the next level. There is no ‘death age’ nor ‘distance’ in B; but colour and metals are as in A. Sex persists in B.

Diagram showing the spiral track on which the rates lie. The great extent of the spiral can easily be demonstrated by taking the figures from the table at the end of the book measuring them on to a forty divisional circle.

There is a third whorl outside number two. It is rather a trouble to investigate, for its rates are those of the first whorl plus 40 and again 40. This makes a very long cord on the pendulum, which is difficult to measure and awkward to use. I use the well of the staircase for experiments.

As far as I have investigated, number three is again a replica of number one; but on it there is once more no rate for time. Events are evidently once more in time sequence as they are on the first whorl.

There for the moment I must leave it, for I have nowhere suitable to look for a fourth whorl. It seems most probable that there is one and that what we have been examining is a measured demonstration of the truth of the Buddhist belief in the endless repetition of life and everything else.

If so however there seems to be something left out in what is reported about their belief, for I have never heard of timeless intervals between the lives.

Of course I may have reasoned incorrectly from the information at my disposal. I do not trust my powers of reasoning. But others must experiment and see that the facts are there as I have told, for this appears to be something of vital importance.

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Monkey's Tail - a study in evolution and parapsychology; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, SBN 7100 6598 1.
[2] Lethbridge overlooked the rainbow colour violet (32) and has not provided a rate for the seventh rainbow colour indigo. [Ed]

Comments

The Universe on a Brane

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:00:40 +0200

© Brian Greene 2004

When we use our eyes, we use the electromagnetic force; when we use powerful instruments like electron microscopes, we also use the electromagnetic force; when we use atom smashers, one of the forces we use to probe the ultrasmall is, once again, the electromagnetic force. But if the electromagnetic force is confined to our three-brane, our three space dimensions, it is unable to probe the extra dimensions, regardless of their size. Photons cannot escape our dimensions, enter the extra dimensions, and then travel back to our eyes or equipment allowing us to detect the extra dimensions, even if they were as large as the familiar space dimensions.

to be continued

Comments

Hermits & Poets by Tom Lethbridge

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:55:25 +0200

© Tom Lethbridge 1967 [1]

Let us accept that the inexplicable does take place, and cock a snook at the man who wastes his life trying to disprove it. He never can. However clever he may be, an enormous proportion of the population of the globe regards him as a half-wit. There is just something short in his make-up which prevents him from linking up with the world of nature. Dear me, how terrible it must be to be in his position. It would be more comfortable to be stark staring barmy!

How much more comforting it is to meet a sheepdog on a track among the heather, grin at it and see it grin at you, than to behave as a bogus lord of creation and regard it as one of the lower animals, with no soul, nor possibility of a future existence. For we go on as the spiral shows we must do, and they go on too. The sheepdog will still be there to smile at you in his delightful way on the next whorl of the spiral. Do not bother about what any Smart Alec says, it must be so.

The fellow who leant over the rampart of the Iron Age fort, seething with rage and nursing his sling for a chance of a shot at a hated enemy, is there just as much as a flicker of his spirit remains attached to the stone he eventually slung. That is what we surely seem to be beginning to learn.

Once we have passed the 40 mark on the disc, there is no more time. Tennyson saw it in Ulysses. ‘I am a part of all that I have met.’ In fact poets seem to be able to get far nearer to the heart of the matter than any modern philosopher, or theologian.

The poet somehow has a thinner refracting layer at 40 inches than most. Many seem to be able to slip from one layer of the mind to the next without any difficulty. But then to be a real poet you have to sit and think. Few people nowadays have time to do this and would have to go on the dole if they tried to do it.

It is the old story of Mary and Martha all over again, over and over again. Martha has no time to spare for thinking about anything of real importance. Our whole educational system is designed to produce Marthas. Mary made time to sit and think about what everything meant. So when she met someone who really knew something, she was able to listen and understand.

This may be a parable, or it may be fact, it does not matter which; but the more facts educationalists cram into the heads of children, the fewer real thinkers they will produce. All that a man really has to be taught is to be given enthusiasm to read, and then be given the time to do it. With this he can teach himself anything.

But think how many corns of vested interest I tread on by saying this. From the professor in his university rooms, to the village school teacher, they all depend for their livelihood on being able to repeat what they have been taught by someone else.

Not only must they be able to repeat it, they also have to be able to persuade gullible politicians that what they have as their stock in trade is of great importance. Half an up-and-coming don’s life is spent in persuading people that his special line is of vital importance and that he needs more people to teach it, when in truth it would be far better for the intellectual development of the students if they had to sweat up the subject for themselves and learn to form their own judgement on what they read.

All the real sages of antiquity had to get away somewhere quiet to think things out. In the East they still do. How far the modern ones get, we never know and in any case they may not have been first-class material to start with. But both of the really great religious founders, whom we know about, Jesus and Buddha, did this.

In the case of the Christians this tradition of going away into a desert place for contemplation survived so long into the Dark Ages that only the piratical attacks of the Norsemen made it impossible. The remoter islands round the western coasts of the British Isles are dotted with the remains of the dwellings of these contemplatives.

They are scattered from the south, right round the west of Ireland, up past the Hebrides, Orkneys and Faeroe Islands. I have found and published evidence for their existence in Iceland, and the story of Cormack makes it reasonably certain that they went as far as Greenland itself. If you believe the stories about St. Brendan they may well have contemplated on the shores of America.

This contemplative urge would never have survived had not men realized that great results could be secured by satisfying it. ‘Sometimes I sit and thinks, and sometimes I just sits’ sounds a ridiculous performance. But it is not. Unless you give yourself time to sit and think the world becomes such a desperate place that you cannot really think at all.

And if you cram your mind with a mass of facts which could easily be found by turning up a reference book, you are straining its capacity for learning something else. Also you need to think by yourself. In the gabble of the herd nobody can think clearly, except the Smart Alec and the pickpocket who thrive on the bemused state of their fellows.

Once, in 1937, on the way to Greenland from Scotland in a small Norwegian sealing-ship, we met such heavy weather in and passing the Pentland Firth that we ran into Loch Eribol for shelter. Some of us pulled ashore in a hunting boat to see the country.

Outside an isolated croft an elderly man was sitting thinking on an upturned tub. He was not in the least surprised to be greeted by strangers from a foreign ship, although probably few ever entered the loch. He just asked us where we were going. ‘Round Cape Farewell and up West Greenland,’ we replied. ‘Ah,’ he said, ‘that will be twelve hundred miles’ and relapsed into silence.

He was contemplating and did not want to be disturbed. There was no thrill at meeting someone new, who might tell him things about London or Edinburgh or Cambridge. This was of no importance whatever. He was sitting there reasoning out the why and wherefore of life. Anything else was completely superfluous.

I have met others on lonely islands, who were so excited at seeing someone new that they were almost hysterical. One Canadian Mountie on Ellesmere Land was so thrilled that he could not sleep for a couple of nights.

But the man who wants to think would rather not see too many people and have to talk to them. Therefore the Hindu seekers after truth retire to the most inaccessible places they can find and there undisturbed they look on the grandeur of nature, think about what it all means and are contented.

For to them humanity in bulk is a nuisance and a bore. It is not of the slightest interest to hear that so and so has met somebody and what they said to each other. They do not really care if the weather is going to be hot or cold, wet or fine.

The one burning question is ‘What is the meaning of it all?’ And that is our question too, although we are not hermits and enjoy meeting our fellows in limited numbers.

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Monkey's Tail - a study in evolution and parapsychology; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, SBN 7100 6598 1.

Comments

Pendulum Science by Tom Lethbridge

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:28:22 +0200

I was wrong to assume that nothing at all could be projected into the field of an inanimate object. This was a mistake of considerable importance, but, as I always say, I do not trust my own reasoning and I am completely unabashed to say that I was wrong in my inferences at that time.

It seems probable now that some of the descriptions obtained from the sensitives were just thought reading from my mind; however the possibility remains that others were genuine impressions from the past stored up in the fields of the objects themselves. I was right too, I think to suggest that each object was a link. It was; but not the kind of link I had thought.

Let us look at the sling-stones again. [2] The pendulum seems to tell us, with no uncertainty, that a man who takes a pebble, and throws it with determination, adds something of his thought and masculinity to the field of the pebble. If a woman does the same, she also adds something of her thought and sex to it.

But the pendulum can only talk to us in a very simple kind of code. It cannot say what the thought consists of, how detailed it is, or what kind of picture is in the head of the thrower of the stone. Much toil and experiment might widen the pendulum’s report considerably; but at best we could only hope that it might produce a picture of the nature of an Identikit. However the sensitive appreciates something resembling a very tiny cinema film.

What happens now? The sensitive seems to me, and I think I obtained evidence of this, to experience the equivalent of a dream when holding an object. There is this tiny cinema film which is evidently difficult to appreciate clearly.

But this film, although perhaps more often representing scenes far back in the past, may at times also show events which have only happened a few minutes ago and others which have not yet happened at the time the statement is made. This is just like the mixture which Dunne taught us to observe in dreams. There are past memories and future memories.

Since no memory can be completely accurate, none of these impressions is likely to be exactly right. Uncle Joe’s watch chain may inform the sensitive that he once became involved with a dancing girl in Cairo, but may also tell that he will have a fit in ten years time. But these small events may easily become the theme of one small strip of cinema film viewed by the sensitive.

I spent, or wasted, the best part of a year on this problem. At times I felt it was all rubbish; at others I hovered on the verge of credulity. But, like Dunne, and in much the same manner, I could often pick scraps from my own memory out of it all. Then I got a complete and imaginary story which a few minutes before I had told to a sick child. I was disgusted with the whole subject and took no more interest in it for many years. It appeared to be nothing more than a form of thought reading, which we all know can be done.

Now, on top of this, comes the result of the experiments with sling-stones. It seems evident that something from a human mind can be implanted in the field of a beach pebble. I cannot get round this. Someone may be able to think of a way round it. But I cannot.

A piece of Elizabethan blacksmith’s ironwork retains the rates of his thought and sex for 400 years as I described in ESP. A flint implement made perhaps 3,500 years ago tells the pendulum that its maker, or user, was male or female. Either the pendulum is a complete liar, or something can be forced into the field of an inanimate object.

But the pendulum is not a liar. It can find these hidden truffles over a hundred yards away or pins and beads under the lawn. It can find water, or silver, or gold. We cannot think of the pendulum as a liar and, if it makes a mistake we can generally find out why it did so. It may have been interrupted by lead, or calcium, or by the wood of an elm floor.

So I think we must accept the fact that something from a human field can be added to that of an inanimate object. How much can be added, we do not know. Can the field of a woman’s brooch contain the complete story of her experiences every time she wore it?

It seems most improbable, and if it did surely it would take a sensitive many hours to recount the whole thing. But after the tale that the sling-stones told we cannot discount it altogether. Sensitives apparently do extract long and correct stories from objects with no direct link between them and the owner of the object.

If I handed a sling-stone to a sensitive and was told a story which went something like this:

‘This stone was brought from a long way away into a place on top of the hill. It was a very long time ago. The place has houses in it, which look like African huts. It has high banks round it with a platform running round and a strong fence beyond that. There are untidy, unshaven men on the platform. They are angry and excited. They are picking these things up and putting them into a kind of pouch in the middle of two thongs and then throwing them in a curious way over the fence’.

I should be very doubtful. Such a picture could be extracted easily from my own mind. So could stories about Uncle Joe’s misdemeanours in Cairo be extracted from the memory of the person who handed the sensitive his watch chain. Or at least this might be the case.

To the person who hands the object to the sensitive, the results are often most impressive. You can hardly doubt that they are true. But where you can test them, you either know the answer, or you are able to find it out. Time does not come into it. These things are outside time. This subject is so terribly nebulous. Hardly anything can be tested by any ordinary method. All psychometry may be really some form of thought reading.

But you can test it to some extent, as I described in an account in ESP, using two operators and two pendulums isolated from one another. With these, simple information about the field of an object can be transferred from one pendulum to another.

I do not think that psychometry can be dismissed. But I do think that any results obtained by this method need the closest scrutiny before they can be believed. They may contain a mixture of fact, memory and even imagination from the sensitive combined in a film closely resembling a dream. Past and future memories may both be there.

Now the following point arises. Can we, by using the pendulum, make the position any clearer? Anyone with a critical mind can see at once flaws in the psychometrical performance of a given sensitive. You can tabulate hundreds of cases in which the sensitive has told you the truth. Still I very much doubt whether in any single case you can show that this truth is unmixed with some feature, which does not really belong to the story.

I have had one of these people when handed an old family object describe my great great grandfather and grandmother receiving their guests at a house, which can only have been their home at Sandhill Park, in Somerset. As far as I could see it might all have been correct. The sensitive was terribly thrilled. As I remember her words, she said: ‘This is wonderful. I have never seen anything like this. This is the money.’

Although a little disgusted, I let her go on and she became even more enthusiastic. ‘There they are on the steps receiving their guests. What a handsome pair they are,’ and so on. Now she may have seen this. She may have got it out of the field of the object, but why? Could she not have got it just as well out of my memory of what life was like in a big country house before the Kaiser’s War?

Not only that, but there were a couple of prints of Sandhill hanging on the wall in our house where she made this oration. I did not believe a word of it, yet it was very impressive. If I had no critical faculty, I would have accepted it as a kind of miracle. I think most people would have done so. It seemed so complete. You see how difficult this study is. So much may be true and yet the source of it can be entirely different from what it appears to be.

Still, what about the sling-stones? In these trivial and natural objects we seem to see beyond reasonable doubt that something from a human being can be impressed and fixed in their fields for thousands of years. No matter what appears to go wrong with the pictures appreciated by the sensitive, who may only be dealing with a species of dream, there is something which seems to last indefinitely.

Something can move from the third dimension into the fourth and once there appears to be indestructible. You may destroy the object in the third dimension, but in the fourth it is impossible to destroy. It is beyond the 40-inch mark on the second whorl of the spiral.

The pendulum only deals with fourth-dimensional matter. It deals by means of a sixth sense with things which have not been intended for the comprehension by the five senses and dealt with by the brain in its action as a resistance and computer. It was never designed for dealing with these fourth-dimensional affairs, or if it was, its functioning has been largely smothered by the pressures of the modern world, which pays too much attention to the other five.

The sixth belongs to what the Church describes as the world of the Spirit, but which I prefer to think of as a higher level of Mind. Of course this is theory and not a statement of fact. However, it seems that no one at the present day is in a position to refute it.

The dogmatic materialists may say: There are only five senses. Mind is inseparable from brain and brain dies when the body dies.’ The Church says there is body, soul and spirit, but seems completely incapable of explaining what it means by soul and spirit. In fact much of its reasoning appears to be fifteen hundred years old. When it tries to be modern and up-to-date, it leaves out the miracles on which its whole purpose depends because science cannot find a place for them in its three-dimensional study.

This seems quite crazy, for surely what it is trying to do is to raise man’s intelligence to a point where it can contemplate and make use of matters concerning a fourth dimension, where time and space no longer behave in accordance with the ordinary rules of earthly measurement.

How long this unfortunate state of affairs will drag on is anybody’s guess. But it cannot last much longer. For mankind is sick of being bombarded by dogmas from both schools of thought. All over the world you find groups of people looking for a new way. Those who think about it at all, and they are far more numerous than anyone might imagine, know that there is more to Life than science would have them believe and at the same time they cannot accept a rehash of the ideas of men who lived in the Dark Ages.

But if you take no notice of all the mass of theological theory which has been built up down the ages and just read the Gospels as if they were sagas, or Dark Age Chronicles, you may find a very clear account of someone going about in Palestine and making great use of fourth-dimensional methods. And these are the miracles which the modern church is trying to throw overboard. What is then left?

When Jesus was questioned by John’s disciples as to who He was, He told them to go back and describe the miracles, which they had seen performed. Nothing was said about a code of life. Surely those who practice radiaesthesia and try to heal their fellows by that means are far nearer the truth than the confident gentlemen in cope and mitre who try to throw the whole thing away?

These seem neither to have understood the teachings of science, nor the teachings which they are paid to profess. It amazes many people that they can bring themselves to accept their stipends; while all the time many quiet people are getting on with the performance of these very miracles. If Gilbert were still alive he could have a fine comic opera out of it all. I believe I could almost write it myself.

Of course healing miracles are not in my line. I have done simple things now and then, but it was mostly bluff. My line is curiosity. I believe everything to be natural, and I want to find out how it works. This may not be a very noble outlook, but if there had been no curiosity, there would be no science today.

I am sure that when it is properly worked at, parapsychology will become the greatest science of them all and all of them will be contained in it. It is not a cobwebbed collection of superstitions, but a step higher on the ladder of evolution. After all, those who are investigating six senses must be learning something more than those who only know of five. We may not be brilliant investigators and our inferences may be all wrong; but having had to work everything out from scratch, it is remarkable how far we seem to have got.

Who would have thought, for instance, when we made our first tentative experiments with a ball cut from the end of an old walking stick, that we would before long be able to formulate an axiom: the rate on a pendulum is always equal to the radius of a circle forming the base of a double cone of a force field about that object. We don’t know what that force is. It may not even have a name as yet. But we do know something.

Then too there are these cardinal points at 10, 20, 30 and 40 inches. These are startling evidence of a master plan at the back of it all. Why should the pendulum produce these four groups of most important conceptions unless it had all been planned in advance.

These are not all the things we have found under each rate, but they are so important that the plan is obvious. Try them in centimetres and see whether anyone would have been likely to observe the arrangement. The inch is the measure of a man’s thumb. Surely his body was designed to fit this scale and the inch was shown to him as an obvious measure. Perhaps I am being altogether too imaginative, but see what happens if you try to fit the rates into another set of divisions, 36 for instance.

No cardinal point comes opposite another. This 36 scale is that employed on the magnetic compass. It does not fit, for ours are concerned with true north and not magnetic north. It is just the same story if you try to fit the rates into a mariner’s compass card of 32 divisions. It will not work. But a 40-division circle fits exactly.

I believe this will be something quite fundamental and a clue to the organization of the whole systematic development of the Earth. It indicates the existence of a mind at the back of the whole thing. You can call it Mind, God if you prefer, but a mind must be there and must have organized everything with great care. Yet how could you demonstrate this without a pendulum?

Endnotes

[1] Source: The Monkey's Tail - a study in evolution & parapsychology; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, SBN 7100 6598 1.
[2] Colin Wilson notes (see Chapter 24) that Lethbridge had established, to his own satisfaction, that material things retain the impress of events in which they have been involved. A sling stone used in a battle two thousand years ago still gives a reading for ‘anger’ when a 40-inch pendulum is suspended above it. He also found that both he and his wife could impress anger and gender on pebbles by hurling them. [Ed]

Comments

Healing by Tom Lethbridge

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:32:46 +0200

Radiaesthetic healing [2] appears to work through the repulsion of some kind of force from the channel in which it had become accustomed to flow. What this force is, nobody knows. But it is clearly the same force which we have been trying to understand. It is something different from all the forces which scientists have spent enormous time and trouble in investigating. It is not electricity as we know it, and it is not magnetism; because the pendulum clearly shows that it is related to true North and not magnetic North.

But it is extremely powerful. One can pull it out between one’s fingertips and see it faintly, like the spark between the two terminals of an arc lamp. So strong it is that, when holding the pendulum, it can make one’s hand judder like a car which will not take a gradient. It is some force which we have not as yet studied.

But it is a force which was known and controlled by men long ago. They knew how to generate it, and how to store it in the fields of trees and stones. In our rather simple study we can see that we ourselves can do the same. I cannot be expected to know much about it, but I call it the Life force.

It is the force which makes all nature work. It is not nature itself, but it is the life force of nature. Furthermore it is not confined to our earthly time scale, or to our earthly scale of distance. It is something which really belongs to a level of existence in which there is neither time nor distance.

This is terribly hard for us to understand. We have to go back to a stage in our development before we were taught to read time on a clock, or to think how far it was to the front gate. But you have only to look about you to see that there cannot be a fixed time scale for living things. A raven may live a hundred years, a blue-tit one and a mayfly a day. Also consider how far a mile would be to an ant. Nowhere in nature is there a fixed scale.

A cabbage may exist for a few months, a beech tree for hundreds of years and a sequoia may live for a couple of thousand. There are no fixed scales. The scales are made by man. He uses them to fit his conception of his own life cycle. But the force we are trying to understand is outside any of these scales.

Things may appear to happen many years before they really do; or they may appear just as vividly many years later. If men get to the moon in rockets, some have been there already. There may be ghosts walking about among us who went to Venus a thousand years from now. It all sound absurd and impossible, but it is fact. Go back to the first time when you turned on a tap, and begin to think again.

So we have an unknown force, which can impress things on certain objects and the impressions may last for ever. There is no time to displace them. Much of the animal world makes use of this force. There is no time nor distance calculation to interfere with the migrations of the swallow or the Arctic tern. They have their beam on which they travel infallibly. The insect flies to its food, honey, or dung, dying wood or carrion with perfect ease.

There are healers who use a pendulum, but I do not know if any of them use the long pendulum and obtain rates with it like we do; but I rather think they do not. I had not thought of investigating this kind of thing; then, quite unexpectedly we became involved in it.

Some months ago my wife saw a friend of ours, who had hurt his toe which was painful. More of less jokingly he dared her to heal it. Naturally, being dared like that, she took up the challenge and then expected me to know how she ought to do it.

I had not the slightest idea how to begin. But I did have two rates, which were apparently those of Health and Disease. They were opposites on the 40-divisional circle, 32 and 12 inches respectively. We had no blood-spot; but we had a specimen of the man’s handwriting. Going by intuition rather than reason, it seemed to us that if you tuned in on the right rate for health over this letter you might produce some kind of result.

Since my wife had been challenged, she had to be the magician. She measured the 32-inch rate on the pendulum and swung it gently over the letter lying on the stone floor. It gyrated strongly and she counted 120 revolutions. Then it stopped and returned to a back and forth swing.

At a second count later in the day the number of revolutions fell to 96. Two counts next day gave 72 each time and the following day two of 60. Then one of 44 and lastly one of 32, which was the same as the rate on the pendulum.

We thought it was probably similar to the ‘normal’ of a clinical thermometer, but we were wrong. For three and a half more days the 32 count remained steady and then an evening count suddenly gave 96 followed next morning by one of 50. There were then five consecutive counts of 32. At this point the count dropped to 0 and remained so.

We were, of course, most interested to know whether anything at all had happened to our friend. Then six days after the curious jump in the table, my wife saw him and talked to him about it. His foot had apparently recovered, which it might have done in any case, but the jump in the counts was far more interesting. At 5 p.m. on the 1 December, 1965, the count was taken and written down in a note book following those which had preceded it. At 8 p.m. on the same day our friend was standing on a chair doing some building work when it collapsed and threw him on a heap of rubble. He was not much hurt, but it was of course a shock.

This is once again not possible in three-dimensional study. Three hours before the accident took place, the pendulum told us that something had upset our friend’s health count. It happened approximately fifteen miles away from here. It was a relatively trivial matter, but there it was, indicated in the notebook, three hours before its time. Not only is it remarkable that a pendulum can tell you anything at all about somebody fifteen miles away by just swinging over a bit of his handwriting, it can tell you what is going to happen to him. Mind you, we find this just as hard to believe as you do. It is just utterly impossible, yet it happens.

But here is a knotty point. If the pendulum, as it clearly shows, relates all its information to true North and if we are sure of what the pendulum tells us, then all the power, which is employed both to give information and to heal maladies, comes from something to do with the earth’s mass. The power derived from the Earth’s magnetic field, the gee field as I have called it elsewhere, is relatively small. The other source of power may be gravitation itself. In any case it is very great.

I have called this book A Step in the Dark and so it is. We are stepping out of the ordinary three-dimensional world, which we have known since childhood, into one in which time and distance apparently have no part. It is a step into something darker than Darkest Africa was at the time when my great-uncle, Hanning Speke, discovered the source of the Nile. We know nothing about it at all.

Yet it seems that if we could explore it more we would find that this unknown world is far lighter than the one to which we are accustomed. It seems probable that all the inventions, which are regarded as so wonderful in this three-dimensional world, are really commonplace of the other and are slowly filtered down to us by ideas put into men’s heads during sleep.

This may sound far-fetched; but it is perfectly clear that during sleep our minds do go into the state where there is neither time nor distance. Dunne showed this conclusively in his Experiment with Time, and this discovery must always remain to his credit whatever may be thought of his mathematics. Our dreams are a mixture of past and future memories as Dunne demonstrated.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapter 10 in A Step in the Dark by T.C.Lethbridge; Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1967, ISBN 0 71001 741 3
[2] The term radiaesthetic healing is normally used to encompass any form of healing that uses the human energy field.

Comments

List of Contents

Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:22:45 +0200

THE LETHBRIDGE FILES
Contents

PART I
01. Foreword by William Shepherd
02. Heretic of the Fens by William Shepherd
03. The Legacy by Tom Graves
04. The Quest by Colin Wilson
05. How to Do Magic by Tom Lethbridge
06. We Are What We Eat by Tom Lethbridge
07. Fixing the Age of Things by Tom Lethbridge
08. Healing by Tom Lethbridge

PART II
09. Psi Potential by Tom Lethbridge
10. Beyond the Lines by Tom Lethbridge
11. Lucky Trees by Tom Lethbridge
12. Interrupters & Reversers by Tom Lethbridge
13. Classifying Coordinates by Tom Lethbridge
14. Good Vibrations by Tom Lethbridge
15. Sixth Sense by Tom Lethbridge
16. New Dimensions by Tom Lethbridge

PART III
17. Alchemy & Divinity by Tom Lethbridge
18. Pendulum Science by Tom Lethbridge
19. Invisible Rays by Tom Lethbridge
20. The Life Planners by Tom Lethbridge
21. The Life Eternal by Tom Lethbridge
22. Saxon Britain by Tom Lethbridge
23. Hermits & Poets by Tom Lethbridge
24. The Outsider by Colin Wilson

PART IV
25. Sons of God by Tom Lethbridge
26. UFOs by Tom Lethbridge
27. Avatars by Tom Lethbridge
28. The War in Heaven by Tom Lethbridge
29. Megaliths by Tom Lethbridge
30. Our Great Dilemma by Tom Lethbridge
31. Creating Gods by Tom Lethbridge
32. The Spiral of Evolution by Tom Lethbridge

APPENDIX
A. Brave New Universe by Brian Greene
B. Science & Religion by Stephen Jay Gould
C. Practical Dowsing by David Brandon
D. Dowsing & Brain Waves by David Brandon
E. The Geometry of Universe by David Brandon
F. The History of Dowsing by Hamish Miller
G. Dowsing by Wilhelm Reich
H. Premonitions by Rupert Sheldrake

Comments

Saxon Britain by Tom Lethbridge

Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:00:23 +0200

Now our step in the dark reminds me very much of something recorded by Bede in his Ecclesiastical History. This is often quoted and many people must know it. In AD 627, when Bishop Paulinus had brought the Christian princess, Ethelberga, from Kent to be married to the pagan king, Edwin of Northumbria, he reminded Edwin of a vow the king had made when an exile at the court of Redwald, King of East Anglia. In effect Edwin had promised to become a Christian when a certain sign was given to him. This was that a hand would be laid on his head.

Paulinus laid his hand on the king’s head and recalled the vow. Edwin recognized his obligation, but, before taking any irrevocable step, called his council together and discussed the matter. Was the court and country to become Christian or not?

During this debate, a speech was made by one of the council, which was so completely reasonable and so typical of the English way of thinking that the gist of it has survived in the writings of Bede to this day:

‘The present life of man, O King, seems to me, in comparison of that time which is unknown to us, like to the swift flight of a sparrow through the room wherein you sit at supper in the winter with your commanders and ministers, and a good fire in the midst, whilst the storms of rain and snow prevail abroad. The sparrow, I say, flying in at one door, and immediately out at another, whilst he is within, is safe from the wintry storm; but after a short space of fair weather, he immediately vanishes out of your sight into the dark winter from which he had emerged. So this life of man appears for a short space, but what went before, and what is to follow, we are utterly ignorant. If, therefore, this new doctrine contains something more certain, it seems justly to deserve to be followed.’

This was apparently the turning point of the discussion, especially since Coifi, the chief of Edwin’s own pagan priests, had already remarked: ‘I verily declare to you, that the religion which we have hitherto professed has, as far as I can learn, no virtue in it.’ The kingdom became Christian and Coifi himself was the first to defile the temple of the old gods.

The scholars of Victorian times foisted on us a completely erroneous picture of the Anglo-Saxons. They are looked upon as ferocious and completely bloodthirsty robbers. It is true that in the fourth century in the days of Ammianus Marcellinus there were robber bands living among the provincial Romans of Gaul, much like the bandits of China, who were known as Saxons.

But painstaking archaeological research has shown clearly that there were settlements of North Germans in Roman Britain long before the history book date of their first appearance. The people, who were known as Saxons in Britain, were largely Frisian in origin and the country when it crystallized out into the Seven Kingdoms of the Heptarchy contained a mongrel race, Romano-Briton, Frisian, North German and Dane, all of much the same original stock.

Their kings, sometimes with British wives, generally claimed a descent of great antiquity and they themselves, at least in the case of Edwin, attempted to carry on the tradition of the former Roman rulers. Edwin is said by Bede to have always had a Roman standard carried before him. They were pagan, but so were most of the Romans of Western Europe. And their paganism, as is shown by the remarks of Coifi, was only skin deep. Coifi himself can hardly have been any kind of teuton with a name like that.

Neither was England cut off from the Continent. Even in peasant graves there are masses of imported glass beads, purse-rings of elephant ivory and cowrie shells from the Indian Ocean; while the graves of the rulers contain metal objects from Egypt and Byzantium; glass vessels from the Rhineland; garnet, crystal and amethyst from abroad and much else besides.

The Saxons were not primitive savages, neither were they ignorant of the outside world; but they and it lived in the wreckage of a great civilization and in a state of frequent warfare. Comfort as it is known today did not exist and privacy, even in the king’s hall, was unknown. We can picture this hall, Edwin’s country house at Adgefrin, as perhaps a great wooden tithe-barn, with a log fire down its length. The bays between the posts which supported it could be divided off into rooms by hangings, as one can see illustrated in some of the nearly contemporary illuminated manuscripts. The king himself and his family sat, fed and slept on a raised dais at one end. Others of his court lived in the same way on broad benches against the walls down the sides and in each of the longer sides was a door through which the sparrow of the story flew.

We can reasonably infer that all available woodwork inside was elaborately carved. This can be judged from the great number of bronze brooches ornamented with chip-carved designs, which are recovered from the pagan graves; while in the earliest Christian graves ornament becomes more intricate, although still apparently derived from wood-carving. In still later centuries this carving was also transferred to the stone monuments, which are still relatively common and well known throughout the country.

It was a chance remark by Sir Cyril Fox to me years ago, which made me think of the meaning of Anglo-Saxon ornament. He suggested that much Celtic Iron Age pattern had once been found in the woodwork of chieftain’s houses.

I have given this brief sketch to show the kind of thing which Edwin’s councillor regarded as the height of luxury and comfort. Nothing more elaborate was known or thought of. There was absolutely no occupation after dark, but to eat, drink, play primitive games like draughts and listen to stories and songs.

Even love making was presumably confined to the summer hay field. Yet this was life as it was known and appreciated. As far as it went it was good and even the sparrow must have realized that it was to be preferred to the rain, snow and dark outside.

If Paulinus could give sure information that that darkness was not as it seemed to be, but that there was another and even better life beyond this one, of course this was great news indeed. But the imagination of the councillor would not run beyond a glorified version of the king’s hall.

Neither could that of the Apostles, for they were simply told to expect ‘many mansions’ in the world beyond, glorified versions perhaps of Herod’s palace or the Governor’s villa. So if we today are to imagine the appearance of a future existence, this imagination will be coloured by what we see and know around us. The boredom of the long winter evenings has gone and privacy is almost universal.

If the pendulum is telling the truth and our inferences from what it tells us are correct, then indeed the next world has all the properties of this, but we cannot see beyond the 40-inch rate for death because the two worlds have not the same register. There is this refracting layer, which appears to shift the centre of everything by 40 inches.

This is a fascinating speculation and there is no reason to suppose that I have argued correctly from the information available. But if it should chance that I have come to the correct conclusion, then the story that the pendulum is telling us is the same story which Paulinus told and which made so great an impression at Edwin’s court nearly thirteen hundred years ago.

There is an important clue, which seems to support this theory. Many reports have been recorded of persons, who when near to death have looked at their own bodies from outside and watched what was happening to those bodies with interest and complete absence of fear or feeling.

This has not happened to me and, although I seem to have once nearly died under an anaesthetic, nothing came to memory afterwards. But I have talked to apparently reliable people who have had this experience and I have had letters from others describing similar situations. I have no doubt that these things do occur. It they do, what has happened?

Several of the reports maintain that the observations of their nearly lifeless form were made from a distance of from three to four feet to one side and above the earthly body. Surely the answer is clear the centre of the field of the mind has moved beyond the 40-inch rate out on to the second whorl of our spiral. The observers were looking back at their body from the new position which their mind was taking up

I have a parson friend to whom this type of experience occurred while he was actually taking a burial service. He looked down to see himself conducting the obsequies. He was not ill, but he may have been tired and hungry. The pendulum appears to be giving us a perfectly reasonable explanation of a phenomenon which must take place to everyone at the time of death, assuming that there is another plane to which the mind must go.

I may be in error in speaking of this moving field as mind. Probably I ought to follow the Church’s example and call it soul. For some reason I do not like the word soul. It seems to have a lingering connection with playing harps on wet clouds. I prefer mind to soul, or ego, or any other term and hope that does not lead to confusion. After all nobody knows what the thing is anyway.

Endnotes

[i] Source: Chapter 10: A Step in the Dark; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1967, ISBN 07100 1741 3.

Comments

Magesteria

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:23:46 +0200

In his book Rocks of Ages, the late Stephen Jay Gould, who had Harvard professorships in both zoology and geology, presents a philosophical thesis on the relationship between science and religion.

In this book, Gould looks at the idea that science and religion can play together without fighting. His argument is christened the thesis of 'non-overlapping magesteria' (NOMA for short).

A magesterium is 'a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for a meaningful discourse and resolution' (p. 5; cf. Kuhn's paradigms).

Thus, the magesterium of science covers the empirical: the composition of the universe ('fact') and the way it works ('theory'). Religion, on the other hand, examines questions of 'ultimate meaning and moral value'.

'These two magesteria do not overlap, nor do they encompass all inquiry.
Science gets the age of rocks; religion the rock of ages;
Science studies how the heavens go; religion how we go to heaven'

to be continued

Comments

Good Vibrations by Tom Lethbridge

Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:27:51 +0200

From 22 to 26 August, 1956, a team of eight men from the BBC was making a television film here at Hole [2], and this included several of the experiments which we have been discussing. I was fitted with a microphone beneath my tie, which was attached by a long length of flex to a sound-recorder in another room.

Over this sound-recorder presided Mr. John Woodiwiss, who has had years of experience with instruments of this kind both in England and overseas. He sat watching a dial on which the range of the human voice only occupied a comparatively small sector. There were graduations for sound inaudible to human ears on either end of the scale.

I was asked to demonstrate the action of an ordinary divining rod, a hazel fork which I had cut from a hedge that morning. The plan was for me to walk slowly, holding the rod, towards my wife. When its apex met her personal field of force the rod would turn over.

I picked up the rod and the camera began its work. Hunched over the sound-recorder, however, there was complete amazement on the part of Mr Woodiwiss for, as I picked up the rod and settled it into position, the needle on the dial leapt up, far beyond the limits of human hearing and stuck there. This had happened to Mr Woodiwiss once before, years ago, when recording near a tomb in Egypt. Never again.

Now, if this incident shows, as it appears to do, that the force operating the divining-rod, and presumably the pendulum as well, is sound which can be measured on a dial, we are in the realm of exact science even if we are adding another dimension to it.

We are also coming once again to the ancient Greek belief that the whole universe is governed by harmonics. If this suggestion is anywhere near the truth, then our divining rod is some relation of the homely tuning-fork; our rates are inaudible notes obtained when some ray from us strikes an obstruction, and the double cones are the vibrations of some fixed rays similar to the twanging of a taut string. It all makes sense. [3]

One of the modern methods of ‘fringe’ healing is the use of supposedly appropriate colours for a beneficial effect on the minds of people who are mentally disturbed. This treatment is associated with the name of Rudolph Steiner. Results are obtained apparently; but one suspects that it is not the colour itself which does the work. This may well only serve to concentrate the patient’s subconscious attention on the particular rate for that colour.

If the colour were purple, then the concentration could be on safety, or security, something that many troubled minds need desperately. Conversely black has the same rate as death. The wearing of it does not seem to have a very cheering effect on the clergy, although it used to be very becoming on young widows!

The ancient Celts had a colour distinction in their dress. Blue for women, red for kings, green and black for noble laymen and white for clerics. Green and black remain today as tartan.

But more interesting than these distinctions in dress were the points of the compass, the airts for these had colours and each colour an aspect. Black was north, white south, east was purple-red (probably the classical scarlet) and west was somewhere between green and grey. A wind from the east was lucky; but no good came from the west. The north was the airt of evil and misfortune; while that of the south was the one for good luck.

It seems remarkable to me how closely this very ancient system corresponds to our pendulum’s compass.[4] I cannot help thinking that long ago in the Dark Ages men still remembered something of an investigation similar to the one we are now undertaking.

One can say of course that this Celtic system was no more than a recollection of Sun worship. But why should the east be redder than the west, where one so often sees a red sunset? And if the colour of the western airt had any connection with the fortune bringing ‘Green Ray’ or ‘Flash’ it seems curious that this point should have been considered unlucky. Furthermore, Tir nan Og, the land of eternal youth and happiness lay to the west beyond the ocean’s rim.

I think there are two systems confused here and that one of them is definitely related to our study. This Celtic system is not the only one to suggest that more was once known about these matters than anyone might think.

Astrology shows another correspondence with our compass:

East

South

West

North

Fire

Earth

Water

Air

If we combine these two systems, the Celtic and the Astrological, we find that we have a considerable proportion of what was told us by the table of rates. The new table now runs:

East

South

West

North

Fire

Earth

Water

Air

Red

White

Greeny-grey

Black

Good Luck

Good

Bad Luck

Evil

It seems hard to doubt that in the remote past a great deal was known concerning our subject and that we are only just beginning to rediscover facts about the Universe, which were once widely accepted. The chances that the pendulum could reveal such a vital table of details, so similar to the ancient ones, unless both refer to the same facts, must be very great indeed.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapter 11: A Step in the Dark; Kegan Paul, London, 1967, ISBN 07100 1741 3.
[2] Tom and Mina Lethbridge’s home in Branscombe near Sidmouth in Devon.
[3] Source (from here): Ch. 4 (pps 53-54) in A Step in the Dark; Kegan Paul, London, 1967, ISBN 07100 1741 3.
[4] A tabulation of many pendulum rates can be found at: http://www.cesc.net/adobeweb/scholars/lethbridge/ratestable.pdf

Comments

The World on a String

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:35:46 +0200

The World on a String by Brian Greene

to be continued

[1] Source: Chapter 12: The Fabric of the Cosmos (Allen Lane, London, 2004, ISBN 978-0-141-03529-1).

Comments

The Outsider by Colin Wilson

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:28:48 +0200

I feel that it is largely my own fault that I missed the pleasure - and profit - of knowing T.C.Lethbridge. He moved to Devon in 1957, the same year that I moved to Cornwall; so until his death in 1971, we were living within a hundred miles of one another. Moreover, in 1965, I picked up a copy of his book, Witches: Investigating an Ancient Religion, and observed opposite the title page that he had written a book called Ghost and Ghoul.

Two years later, I was commissioned by an American publisher to write a book on ‘the occult’, and settled down to research the subject. I actually quoted Witches in the finished book. [2] Not long after the book appeared, a correspondent asked me why I didn’t contact Lethbridge, since he lived so close; accordingly, I packed up a copy of The Occult and sent it to him, together with a letter introducing myself.

It was his wife, Mina, who replied, telling me that he had died recently. It was only then, lazily and belatedly, that I bought a copy of Ghost and Ghoul, and realized with astonishment - and chagrin - that here was a completely new and original theory about the nature of ghosts, which ought to have been discussed at length in my book. I made a kind of belated apology by dedicating my book Strange Powers, to Lethbridge and his wife Mina.

Since then, I have read all his books, with a growing sense of frustration at the missed opportunity. Now, in introducing his last book, I can at least pay tribute to a man who seems to me to be one of the most remarkable and original minds in parapsychology.

Curiously enough, this interest developed only after the Lethbridges moved to Branscombe, in Devon. Before that, Lethbridge had spent most of his adult life in Cambridge - where he was Keeper of Anglo-Saxon Antiquities at the University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. [3]

Born in 1901, he came to Cambridge soon after the First World War as a student. [4] His attitude to Cambridge seems to have been ambivalent; he left there in 1944 because he was sick of it, but returned because he missed it. By 1957 - when Gogmagog appeared - the love affair with Cambridge was definitely over; he felt the place was becoming too brash and noisy, and the hostile reception given to Gogmagog by archaeological colleagues did nothing to strengthen his attachment.

Mina - whose family is from Devon - located Hole House, a fourteenth-century house, with attached cottage, near Branscombe, and felt that this was the place they had always been looking for. She was right; they were exceptionally happy there.

Up to this time, Lethbridge’s major works were Merlin’s Island (1948), Herdsmen and Hermits (1950), The Painted Men (1954) and Gogmagog (1957); there are also a number of smaller works on boats including Boats and Boatmen (1952) and Coastwide Craft (1952). Nothing is more obvious than that Lethbridge thoroughly enjoyed writing. It was probably fortunate that he came to it late.

He had always been a ‘loner’, whose twin loves were archaeology and the sea. By the time he was in his mid-forties, this independence of mind was well developed and was expressed in a style that was easy, casual and personal. Merlin’s Island begins by explaining that the friends whose help he acknowledges are in no way responsible for the ‘damnable heresies’. [5] In a foreword to Herdsmen and Hermits, T.D. Kendrick, Director of the British Museum, comments with a kind of reluctant admiration: ‘It is here that his opinions, on such subjects, for instance, as the early voyages in northern waters, become almost aggressively memorable, even when one has decided not to believe in them. “This pretty picture may be absolutely incorrect”, he remarks cheerfully when talking of the brooch people.’

Gogmagog: The Buried Gods [6] is the story of Lethbridge’s search for a giant figure cut into the turf near Cambridge, and it includes a number of startling theories - such as that Druidism and Brahmanism had a common origin at some time in the remote past. It is possible to understand why it aroused academic hostility.

To begin with, a number of references to his friend and colleague Margaret Murray make it clear that he accepts her basic theory, advanced in The God of Witches that ‘witchcraft’ is an ancient nature religion based on the worship of the moon goddess Diana. The theory has always had many supporters, and as many bitter opponents, who regard it as little better than imaginative fiction. Margaret Murray enjoyed the dismay she caused; she even enjoyed teasing her academic colleagues until they were speechless with rage.

Lethbridge’s book concludes that the ancient religion of prehistoric England was the worship of the earth mother, Magog, who is identified with the moon, and her husband Gog, the sun, and his views could be interpreted as powerful support for Margaret Murray’s theories of ‘wicca’. As I re-read the book, I can see why it would enrage academic historians; what is astonishing is that a member of an academic community - and keeper of a university museum - could write with such breezy independence of mind and such a lack of the usual conditional clauses.

If the attacks hastened Lethbridge’s decision to leave Cambridge, then we should thank his hostile colleagues. The independence allowed his mind to return to a subject that had always interested him: the hidden powers of the mind. His mother had been fascinated by the subject of fortune telling and in the days of his first marriage Lethbridge himself had taken an interest in the powers of a clairvoyant who was able to ‘see’ scenes from the past.

Lethbridge had seen a ghost in his undergraduate days at Cambridge - I shall refer to this again in a moment - and had also discovered, at a fairly early stage, that he was a good dowser.

Now, at Branscombe, they made the acquaintance of an elderly lady who was wholly immersed in ‘occult’ subjects. She talked to them about pendulums, pentagrams and related matters. She was also, apparently, able to ‘project her astral body’, and wander around and visit her acquaintances at night, as he tells in this present book. [7]

Lethbridge apparently tried his skill with a pendulum, and discovered that it worked. The pendulum is used in much the same way as the divining rod but can give far more information. Not only will it swing in a circle over some buried object (say, a silver spoon) but can also give precise information on the age of the buried object. It can ‘answer questions’ - which leads Lethbridge to conclude that it actually serves as some form of contact between a part of the mind that already knows these things, and our limited everyday consciousness.

I personally have no doubt whatever that certain minds can perceive all kinds of things that are hidden from the rest of us. I spent two days in Utrecht making a television documentary about the ‘paragnost’ Gerald Croiset. Like some freak television set, Croiset’s mind picks up spontaneous ‘pictures’ of other times and other places.

For example, he might be handed a wrapped parcel connected with an unsolved murder case, and say: ‘This contains a cigarette box and a potato sack. The box came from the house of one of two brothers who murdered a teenage girl in a cow barn, and the sack was used to wrap her body…’

Croiset is also able to ‘see’ the future; in many cases of drowning, he has been able to say: ‘The body will float to the surface next Tuesday morning in the vicinity of the maritime museum in the Hague…’, and has been proved correct.

Croiset’s everyday consciousness is apparently able to have direct contact with this ‘other mind’ - perhaps the Superconscious - that knows such things. Lethbridge believes that, for at least one third of mankind (perhaps more), the pendulum can produce the same kind of results, although with less detail.

The experience of using the pendulum, and the sense of freedom from academic restraints, apparently decided Lethbridge to write a book about ‘occult’ topics. The result was Ghost and Ghoul, a book I now heartily wish I had read when it appeared in 1961.

In this book, Lethbridge advances the interesting theory that many ‘ghosts’ - perhaps the majority - are simply a form of ‘tape recording’. This line of thought developed from his experience with pendulums. He had established, to his own satisfaction, that material things retain the impress of events in which they have been involved. A sling stone used in a battle two thousand years ago still gives a reading for ‘anger’ when a 40-inch pendulum is suspended above it.

A paragnost like Croiset might well receive actual impressions of the battle as he held the stone. Is it not possible that many ‘ghosts’ are ‘recordings’ that are played back accidentally when the right observer comes along? The same thing seems to be true of ‘ghouls’, or the ‘nasty feeling’ that can be experiences in certain places.

Lethbridge has a fascinating story, dating back to 1924, of a ghoul he encountered in a chorister’s school in a cathedral close. He and a friend walked into the spot at the bottom of the stairs and experience a ‘wall of icy cold’, imbued with a feeling of misery. When they stepped towards it, the ‘ghoul’ retreated up the stairs. They followed it step by step up to the roof, wondering if it would suddenly materialize and confront them; instead, it reappeared behind them, and they drove it back downstairs to the hall. This ‘ghoul’, Lethbridge thought, had been projected from the subconscious mind of some person who was afraid of a ghost that was reputed to haunt the end room in the corridor.

A comparison of Ghost and Ghoul (1961) and Ghost and Divining Rod (1963) enables us to see the way in which Lethbridge’s theories developed. [8] In the earlier book, he had described seeing the ghost of a woman of about seventy in a garden near Hole House, and advanced the theory that she was a ‘projection’ of somebody’s mind.

Now, in Ghost and Divining Rod, he draws a further conclusion from something he had already noticed in the earlier book: that an underground stream ran under the lane where he was standing, imparting to the atmosphere above it a ‘tingly’ feeling. He also mentions a ‘ghoul’ which both he and his wife experienced on Ladram beach at a spot where a stream ran into the sea.

Could the ‘electromagnetic field’ of the water be somehow to blame - that same ‘field’ that produces the response in the dowsing rod? Is it possible that such fields can receive the impress of an emotion, as the sling stone received the impress of anger, and transmit it later to someone who stands on the same spot? He invents the term ‘naiad field’ for the electromagnetic field of water, and advances the suggestion that mountains and open spaces (like deserts) may also have their own individual fields.

Throughout the nine ‘occult’ books, [9] Lethbridge’s thought is always changing and expanding. Sometimes he changes his mind completely; more often, he modifies a theory advanced in an earlier volume. None of the books attempts to present a complete ‘system’ of ideas; a theme that is only mentioned in one may be developed in another. [10] The final impression is of a brilliant, intuitive intelligence that never ceases to develop.

My own impression is that with the book called ESP: Beyond Time and Distance (1965), Lethbridge entered a new phase of his investigation. In the preface, he describes an incident that occurred on one of his early journeys of exploration to Greenland; chasing a wounded bear, he suddenly fell through a hole in the ice and found himself floundering in icy water. Now, he says, something of a similar nature has happened to me again: ‘I seem to have suddenly fallen through into [a world] where there are more dimensions.’

I feel that, up to this point, he had thought of himself basically as an archaeologist and naturalist who was pursuing a rather interesting sideline. Now it seems as if he has suddenly recognized that what he is ‘on to’ may be more important than any of his work as an archaeologist. The books take on a new force and direction; now he experiments non-stop with the pendulum, and makes all kind of interesting discoveries.

For example, a casual remark by his wife - about why some trees are considered ‘unlucky’ - led him to try studying various types of wood with the pendulum. Elder - a traditionally unlucky tree - gave a reaction for maleness and repulsion, while rowan - regarded as a protection against magic spells - gave a reaction for femaleness and attraction. One remembers Tolkien’s hostile trees in The Lord of the Rings, and Robert Graves’ long investigations into the ancient tree worship of the Druids.

It becomes possible to see what Lethbridge meant by saying he felt as if he had stumbled into another world. Like Graves, he believes that ‘earlier men knew far more about all this than we know today’. But Graves also believed that these early men possessed another kind of knowledge than we possess today. Our knowledge is mostly intellectual, a ‘daylight’ knowledge, which Graves associates with the sun; there is another kind of intuitive knowledge, a ‘lunar’ knowledge, symbolized by the White Moon Goddess herself.

This seems to me to be one of the most exciting things about Lethbridge. He is always stumbling on important insights. Sometimes he follows them up; sometimes he merely mentions them in passing. I have heard his books criticized on the grounds that they are repetitive and inconclusive. But this is necessarily so. They are a kind of working journal into which he poured his fresh discoveries and insights year by year; if they are chaotic, they have that fault with the notebooks of Leonardo and the daily journals of every important discoverer.

It is fortunate for us that Lethbridge decided to write down his discoveries piecemeal in seven or eight small books, rather than storing them up for some large definitive work; the book might never have been written, and the notes would still be unpublished.

But it was in the next book, A Step in the Dark, that Lethbridge first stated what may be his major discovery. In ESP, he had noted that the pendulum ‘rate’ for death seems to be 40 inches, and that dead objects also respond to 20 inches; which led him to speculate that 40 inches may ‘represent life force on a higher plane’.

All earthly objects, including such ideas as danger and time, [11 have rates between 0 and 40. But by extending the pendulum beyond 40 - the death rate - Lethbridge discovered that the pendulum responds once again - the new length being its ‘earthly’ rate, plus 40. (i.e. the pendulum now swings over a ‘false position’ to one side of the object. Lethbridge concludes that there is another realm or dimension in which things also exist - beyond death. Moreover, if the pendulum is extended yet another 40 inches, the same thing happens all over again.

But the pendulum gives no rate for ‘time’ on the second level, as if this realm is somehow timeless; after that, on higher levels, time comes back again. [12] In short, Lethbridge came to suspect that the pendulum is revealing a realm on the other side of death, perhaps several. Its ‘energy rates’ seem to be higher than ours, according to the pendulum.

Oddly enough, the curious researches of Dr Constantin Raudive on the ‘ghost voices’ that sometimes appear on magnetic tape seem to point to the same conclusion; these voices seem to be about twice as fast as earthly speech. [13]

I may also refer to the theories of my friend Dr David Foster, author of The Intelligent Universe; Foster is a cybernetician, but has become convinced that the genes of living creatures could only be ‘coded’ by higher energies than exist on earth - possibly some form of cosmic rays. [14] Lethbridge, himself was, from the beginning, much preoccupied with this whole problem of Darwinian evolution - with the question: Could living creatures have evolved through a mechanical system? [15]

If I needed further evidence that Lethbridge possessed intuitive genius of a high order, it would be provided by his last published book, The Legend of the Sons of God, which appeared posthumously. In 1968, a German publisher had brought out a book called Memory of the Future, which came out in England in 1969 as Chariots of the Gods?. It made its author, Erich von Däniken, a rich man. But by this time, Lethbridge was already at work on The Legend of the Sons of God, which looks as if he had read and digested Däniken. [16]

For, like Däniken, Lethbridge is preoccupied with the question of the great stone megaliths like Stonehenge - or the stone circle called the Merry Maidens, in Cornwall. When he tested the Merry Maidens with a pendulum, the reaction was so powerful that the pendulum described a circle that was almost horizontal to the ground. He concluded that some great force is stored in these stones. [17]

His arguments led him to the conclusion that the great stone megaliths could have been erected as guides to descending aircraft - a kind of ‘landing light’. But if beings landed on our earth as long ago as 2000 BC, then they must have been from another planet, perhaps another galaxy. Why are there so many legends of ‘sons of god’ in ancient literature - angels who came down to earth and mated with human beings

The energy stored in these stones - and probably induced by frenzied religious dances - was probably a form of ‘bio-energy’, Lethbridge believes. Presumably the spacemen who visited our earth understood how to utilize this energy.

It seems a pity that Lethbridge never came across the interesting ideas of John Michell and his fellow ‘ley hunters’, who believe that the straight tracks that can be traced on Ordnance Survey maps - ancient bridle paths - joined spots on the earth’s surface in which this bio-energy reached a high level - sacred places like Glastonbury and Stonehenge. I do not know what he would have thought of the theory but I am convinced that he would have taken it seriously.

This whole subject is too big to be discussed here. Lethbridge would obviously have developed his ideas on the ‘sons of god’ if he had lived, and he would probably have done so more skilfully and plausibly than Däniken, whose excesses have led many people to dismiss the whole thing as pure fantasy. I myself was inclined to take that view after reading Däniken; it was Lethbridge’s book that caused me to change my mind.

I should add that I have also tried dowsing at the Merry Maidens and, to my amazement, because on the only occasion when I had tried dowsing before - in my own back garden - nothing happened, although my wife got a strong reaction. At the Merry Maidens, a friend, Gaston de St Pierre, showed me how to hold the rod; and as I moved beyond the limit of the circle of stones, it shot up until it was almost vertical. Clearly, it was not responding to water, for the ‘line of power’ runs around the Merry Maidens in a circle, about two feet beyond the stones, and there is unlikely to be a circular underground stream. The centre of the circle also gives a powerful reaction.

The day was too windy to try a pendulum; but I am inclined to doubt whether it would work for me. I have tried it in the house, without result. Again, my wife does it very well. Lethbridge suggests that people with a strong sexual impulse may be poor at dowsing, and this may explain it; anyone who has read my books will have noted the basic sexual theme that runs through them. [18]

As to the matter of the megaliths, I happened to raise this question with the economist E.F.Schumacher shortly after finishing Lethbridge’s book. Without prompting, he remarked that he had just returned from an extensive tour of the Middle East, in which he had seen many ancient buildings and tombs with their massive stone blocks, and that he found it inconceivable that the explanation of these blocks could be as simple as the academic archaeologists insist. This was my own feeling when I visited the ruins at Baalbek in 1974, and looked at giant carved blocks that must have taken years to shape and move into place.

that if Lethbridge had lived a year or two longer, he would have been something of a cult figure. [19] The ‘occult revival’ began in the early 1960s in France, and by the mid-1960s it had spread all over the world. This may explain why Lethbridge’s publishers encouraged him to go on producing an average of a book every eighteen months throughout the 1960s.

Some of the experts believed that the ‘craze’ would be over by the early 1970s; but at this moment, there is no sign of it; on the contrary, it seems to be gathering momentum. English and American publishers reprint books that have been out of print for seventy years, [20] and the paperback houses send out a steady stream of popular books on witchcraft, black magic, astral travel and astrology.

Hardly any of these books have anything new to say, although some of them - like Lyall Watson’s Supernature - are important summaries of what modern science thinks of the ‘paranormal’.

Lethbridge’s books stand out for their clarity, originality, and sheer literary quality. He was a born writer. He was also the sort of person who would, as he became known to a wider public, have drawn disciples and followers. With a figure like G.K.Chesterton’s, he also had some of his personal qualities: kindliness, a child-like humour, and a mind that bubbled with ideas like a glass of champagne.

To my mind, these personal qualities emerge most clearly in his unpublished autobiography, one of the most delightful works of its kind I have read since Yeats’. But they can also be found in this, his last book, The Power of the Pendulum, which is, in some way, one of his most ambitious books.

His aim is to review the whole question of whether the world can be described in terms of scientific materialism, or whether something closer to the religious view is correct. Lethbridge is not religious in the ordinary sense - his wife seemed to think he was probably an agnostic. But a man who believes he has accidentally stumbled on a way of establishing that there are other realms of reality beyond this one, and that the ‘soul’ is probably immortal, has more in common with the religious man than with the sceptic.

In fact, Lethbridge was inclined to believe that such distinctions are unnecessary. ‘What is magic today will be science tomorrow’, he says in one of his books. And this remark could be quoted on the title page of all his books; it catches their essential spirit.

One of these days, some enterprising publisher will gather together all Tom Lethbridge’s ‘occult’ books between two covers - it would not be unmanageably large. When that happens, I think we shall recognise that he is a classic; not just of parapsychology, but of English Literature.[21]

Endnotes

[1] Source: Foreword to the 1984 Arkana Edition of The Power of the Pendulum by T.C.Lethbridge first published in 1976 in London by Routledge & Kegan Paul; ISBN 1-85063-003-9. [Ed]
[2] Colin Wilson refers to the anecdote on page 15, in which Lethbridge was led, blindfolded, around the cliffs on Lundy Island, holding a dowsing rod, and accurately detected the position of every one of its buried volcanic dykes. [Ed]
[3] It was a purely ‘honorary’ post, but Lethbridge was glad of the independence; he disliked university ‘trade unionism’ and the need for academic respectability.
[4] Cambridge remained his base for the next thirty-five years or so with the exception of an eighteen-month break in the mid-1940s, when he and Mina, newly married, tried to become cattle farmers on an island off the west coast of Scotland.
[5] I am not sufficiently well versed in Anglo-Saxon history to know what these are.
[6] Gogmagog: The Buried Gods by T.C. Lethbridge; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1957, ISBN 0-7100-1742-1. [Ed]
[7] Also mentioned in Legend of the Sons of God: a Fantasy? by T.C. Lethbridge; Arkana, 1990, ISBN 978 0 140 19262 9. [Ed]
[8] The book that came in between these two was Witches, but since this deals mainly with Margaret Murray-type theories of witchcraft, it need not concern us here.
[9] The series begins with Gogmagog and end with The Power of the Pendulum.
[10] For example, the theme of precognition and dreaming is briefly mentioned in Ghost and Ghoul, to be fully developed in The Power of the Pendulum.
[11] The pendulum gave Lethbridge no rate for time on the first and third whorls of the spiral, 0-40 inches and 80-120 inches, but gave one at 60-inches on the second whorl. Lethbridge eventually concluded that the second whorl was a timeless zone. [Ed]
[12] Readers may find this short exposition bewildering, but Lethbridge develops the whole idea further in the Power of the Pendulum, and so I can refer them to him.
[13] Anyone who wants to pursue this point should read Raudive’s book Breakthrough, and listen to the record that goes with it.
[14] Colin Wilson has summarised David Foster’s ideas in the introduction to The Occult. [Ed]
[15] His answer - predictably in the negative - is set out most fully in The Monkey’s Tale (1969), the book that followed A Step in the Dark.
[16] In fact as Lethbridge mentions in his preface to The Legend of the Sons of God, Lethbridge knew nothing of Däniken until a friend sent him the book just as his wife was finishing the typing. [Ed]
[17] See Needles of Stone by Tom Graves for further details. Guy Underwood reports on his own extensive investigations in The Pattern of The Past, first published by Museum Press in 1969 (Abacus, London, 1972, ISBN 0 349 13411 1). [Ed]
[18] In the sixth chapter of The Power of the Pendulum (1976)
Lethbridge remarks that: ‘a certain number of people have no psi count at 9½ inches but instead react to a minus rating of 29½ inches. As far as we can judge at present this minus reading is combined with, or due to, some nervous disability. There is also a sex rate at 16 inches, which is distinct from rates for male and female. The normal count for sex is somewhere between 16 and 20 turns. It has been observed that persons who have a high sex rate of over 40 turns are liable to have a very low psi count. This is not invariable; nor is it the case that a low sex count is always found with a high psi. However the pendulum suggests that too much preoccupation with sex is liable to deaden the more intuitive faculties.’ [Ed]
[19] As it is, admirers have raised the idea of starting a Tom Lethbridge Society.
[20] It was seventy years ago that the last ‘occult revival’ ground to a halt. [Ed]
[21] In Colin Wilson’s foreword to The Essential T.C. Lethbridge edited by Tom Graves and Janet Hoult; Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London, 1980, ISBN 0 586 05077 9; there are two comments about an unpublished Tom Lethbridge autobiography: (a) 'Lethbridge, who was born in 1901, came from a west-country family. In his unpublished autobiography, The Ivory Tower, he remarks that family records date back to the twelfth century, and that the Lethbridges are mostly landed people - soldiers, explorers, members of Parliament and churchmen.’ And (b) ‘In the autobiography his life sounds idyllic: digging up Anglo-Saxon remains all day in quiet country churchyards, and sipping port in the evenings with eccentric characters like Sir William Ridgeway, Sir Cyril Fox, James Wordie and Louis Clarke. The story of those Cambridge years is told in The Ivory Tower, that entirely delightful autobiography which will, I trust, see print in the not-too-distant future.’ [Ed]

Comments

Invisible Rays by Tom Lethbridge

Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:48:48 +0200

More than 30,000 tides have swept through the Minch since that evening long ago when I looked anxiously over its waters, towards the distant saw of the Outer islands, hoping to see the green ray. [2] Pulled by the moon twice a day, the tides flow silently up Loch Snizort and all the much loved inlets of the west. They stir the lugworms in their burrows and wet the feet of the whistling curlews and shrill redshanks. Yet in all these years I have never seen one green ray, nor met anyone who has done so. Instead I seem to have become involved in a maze of invisible rays, numbered by the million.

This is a very difficult picture to appreciate: but, when you see a blanket hanging on a line today, you just say to yourself, ‘Oh, a blanket.’ You do not pull the thing to pieces in your mind, imagining all the crossing threads of wool which make it. You do not reduce these threads to neutrons and electrons. You seldom picture the sheep from which the wool came, among the heather. You do not even have qualms of conscience about it, as did a Home Guard sergeant of mine, who when asked what had happened to some missing gas-capes, replied, ‘I swear I haven’t taken them, sir. I haven’t taken anything since I sold those blankets to the French girls in the last war.’ The object is a blanket and that is that.

It must be something vaguely like a blanket which covers the whole surface of the earth with its invisible rays. We speak of a blanket of fog, so why not a blanket of rays. These rays are not entirely the product of my guesswork based on experiment. Dowsers in aeroplanes have claimed to have been able to locate minerals in the land far below.

If, as I think, our cones of force surrounding objects continue outwards and inwards as rays, the outgoing ones must, I think, be limitless in length and so outside our normal earthly three dimensions. For long periods each day, however, enormous numbers of them must be in contact with the sun. Others at given times would be in contact with the moon. Some would contact both spheres. But many others would frequently extend out into a void.

It would be interesting to know whether the double-cone round an object shrinks when there is no contact with the sun. The taut-string theory might not then apply. This must be a subject of future investigation. The whole idea might well be wrong and the cones produced in some other manner. But if it is partially correct, there might be a very different size of cone when the rays were meeting the moon, and different again if they hit a planet.

It is absurd to think that I might get more than a minute fraction of the answers right. I should imagine that a good scientist would feel that he has had a successful life if he solved one of the questions and I am the most unqualified pioneer.

I am like an untrained prospector wandering out into an unsurveyed desert to look for gold. If he was a good traveller, the prospector might be able afterwards to draw a very rough map showing where certain springs and mountains lay near the fringes of the desert. Picture him trudging across a sandy waste with his pack and billy-can towards a hazy something in the far distance which may be a range of hills. This is me. Someone else can come later with his motor transport, theodolites and water carriers. But he will not have such an exciting time.

Then too there is this power in living animals of directing the rays. One can prove that this is possible by pointing with one’s finger when searching for something. Naturally there must be flexibility in this matter where living and moving animals are concerned. If their fields are to provide channels for the life force, or whatever we are to call it, they cannot be fixed in one plane, or the animal would have a fit when it lay on its side, or ran about.

Also our fields are presumably made up of innumerable cones all interlocking and producing something like a haze round the body. Some of these rays can evidently be pointed at will. But they all appear to be four dimensional. They are not governed by the brain, but by the mind. They are not bounded by time; nor are they governed by distance. Therefore they are also outside the rules of ordinary three-dimensional science and since all nature is governed by law, new laws have to be worked out to explain their behaviour.

Apparently this is the reason why much religious thinking is clearly in such a pickle today. It is trying to fit a four-dimensional subject into a three-dimensional frame, and it is going backwards from its intended line of evolution. It used to be four dimensional, but has listened to so much scientific talk that it has lost confidence in itself. The more it tries to be modern and up to date, the less probable it becomes. Yet I have not the slightest doubt that if it gave up trying to fit phenomena belonging to its own subject into a narrower world and applied itself to a scientific treatment of the other, it would soon discover that much of what it always used to teach was susceptible to real scientific laws. Even in this brief investigation we are surely beginning to realize that.

It is somewhat strange for me to write in this manner. I was trained in an environment in which everything was ultimately derived from an interpretation of Darwin’s ideas. I gave little thought to anything of a religious nature. But, if one is trained to reason in a scientific manner, you tend to apply this to things you do not understand.

After following out various lines of investigation, all facts seem to point to one main conclusion. The assumption that everything is three dimensional and can be studied in terms of these three dimensions is wrong. There are many phenomena which are outside these dimensions. When you study these phenomena you find that most of them fall into what seems to be a religious category. It is not necessarily confined to any one religion; but it is something to do with a mind, or perhaps spirit, which is distinct from the body and acts with no regard to earthly time or distance.

Its study throws great light on those, mostly well authenticated, accounts of the founder of any great religion that we have. If we study our phenomena and those of the actions of this religious founder, the similarity is clear. It is obvious that He had complete mastery of fourth-dimensional knowledge. Further than that I need not go.

I regard the Gospels, to a very large extent, as completely accurate, simply because they fit into and agree with a definite line of research. It is surely a pity if the Church of England is giving them up just at a time when it is beginning to be possible to understand them.

There is nothing in the work with the pendulum which most other people cannot do for themselves. There may be a few people who seem unable to use it, but not many. We are not unusually gifted in this way, although now that we are more used to the thing, it may work a little better than it did. We treat it completely casually, but with interest.

I rather suspect that any concentration of thought hinders the reaction and that if you really thought hard enough you could make it give faulty answers. In fact somebody else can probably will it to go wrong. But if you take it entirely dispassionately, not caring what the answer may be, then I think anyone can get the same kind of results that we do.

This is a mental business, some kind of coded message from the mind to the brain and the link is very slight. One knows from experience that people in a mentally worried state can cause worry in oneself. One can also prevent this by muttering some rubbish a few times in one’s own thinking apparatus.

I do not think the link between mind and brain, which the pendulum indicates, is any stronger than the telepathic link between oneself and the disturbed person. Therefore I have little doubt that the pendulum’s reactions can be upset by excitement on the part of an onlooker and even by the over-keenness of the operator. The proceedings must be coolly dispassionate, really scientific.

However, the interest can be enormous, and it is so ridiculously easy to make the experiments. But the subject is not in the least easy. It is probably more complicated than any other science. Once one has moved beyond the simple analysis of inanimate matter and become involved in the study of the organic, nothing seems to be without its contradictions.

The strange interruptive substances, and those which completely reverse rates of what appear to be sex, are most remarkable. Since the pendulum can apparently show exactly where something is going wrong in a person’s body, one wonders whether one of these reversing substances could not be used to put it right. What could be done with graphite, for instance, in this way?

Men in the Fens used to carry small potatoes in their pockets, because it was believed that they prevented rheumatism. Was this the same principle and did it work? There is much work to be done on all this before even a vague idea of its future possibilities can be obtained.

But I feel sure that if one can once link up the fourth-dimensional mind with the third-dimensional brain great advances will be made. This is what Indian philosophers have tried to do for thousands of years; but with a curiously blind eye to the practical possibilities. Eastern ideas appear to be much more selfish than Christian ones. The one aim seems generally the betterment of themselves and not the help which could be given to others. Some of them have appreciated that they were dealing with a great science but at the same time have not treated it in a scientific manner.

This is where I feel we can start with an advantage. The scientific approach is now ingrained in the western mind. Start at the very beginning: ‘Strip off the layers,’ as Old Sir William Ridgeway used to say, and build everything up from practical experiment in the simplest manner. Bring in no unnecessary complications until the foundations are laid.

This we have been trying to do; but it is far too great a work for a single married couple all by themselves in an isolated Devon combe. Still the isolation has a great advantage in itself. You can think clearly without being bothered by aimless tumult and din. For this reason eastern sages frequently retire to caves and so on, far away from the gabble of the towns. There they can not only think in peace, but there is nothing to break the fragile link with the natural rays rising all about them and nothing to cause their own limited supply of power to leak sideways into the diminished stores of other people.

When people congregate in large numbers, not only is there a continuous wearing down caused by the noise; but there must be a perpetual sideways leakage, back and forth, to other members of the population, tending to lower them all to the rate of the most nervous and mentally inefficient.

The wreckage from the cities, which washes up here from time to time, shows clearly what is happening. These unfortunates, who would have been bright and intelligent in other circumstances, creep greyly about the house, looking like the ‘sad ghosts’ of antiquity. Some insulator could probably stop all this and return them to their natural human state. But ‘Hurry! Hurry! Hurry!’ call the crazy voices and nobody knows what for. To raise the standard of living some people answer.

But what use is there in raising the standard of living on some computer scale when no one appears to have the least idea of what to do with life. How can you free people from this terrible vicious circle, when, if you raise the standard of living, they all use their added money to jump into cars and join a mad rush to some place chosen by the leader of their particular herd?

Here, taking their noise with them, for they can no longer live without it, they lie in countless thousands, like schools of stranded dolphins, absorbing the same leakages from each other from which they had been suffering before.

There is an answer and it is to find something to isolate each person at will from all the others. Then, perhaps, his or her mind might have a chance to send correct ideas to its attendant body. The link is so weak and the fuss and flapdoodle so strong, but the possibility may be there of finding relief by means of the apparently trivial little pendulum.

I cannot be expected to find this on my own. It is surely the business of Church and State and worth far more money in research work than anything that goes towards atomic bombs, or even education. If it is not found, it cannot be long before the whole insane house of cards collapses and the mental homes, already overflowing, will be quite unable to deal with the resulting flood. The answer, I feel sure, is something quite commonplace; but it has to be sought with complete honesty.

What too is this life which we are supposed to live? As far as I can see from the information given by the pendulum, every living thing, or every fragment of a thing once living, whether it is a lump of coal, a fossil, a live cat, or the tooth of a dead fox, has one rate which is common to all life. It is common too to the piece of paper on which I am writing. This rate of 20-inches covers the birds of the air and the fishes of the sea, the grass of the field and humanity itself.

But the organisms which built up the lump of coal have been what we call dead for perhaps 200 million years. Yet they still retain this rate, which seems as if it must be that of life itself. This life therefore appears to be something to do with the fourth dimension, in which the other three dimensions share. The dead object in the three-dimensional world is still alive in the timeless fourth.

If I am right in identifying this 20-inch rate with life, and I have no confidence in my own judgement, then all life is timeless and immortal. We have found a rate also for death and sleep of 40-inches. It is apparently stronger than the life rate. But, although it is stronger, yet every fragment of a dead organism still retains the life rate also.

This is something of such very great importance that others must surely wish to take the very little trouble necessary to go through the series of experiments which I have been trying to describe and seek the answer for themselves. This can be an entirely personal search, carrying conviction to the seeker himself without any interference from the opinions of experts who as yet do not exist.

If he carries it out successfully he will apparently learn that man can in measure create; although he cannot in the three-dimensional world endow his creations with life. But they are, as has often been said by others in a somewhat different sense, extensions of himself and apparently his link with them lasts for ever.

Whether his fourth-dimensional self, which has clearly much greater knowledge than his earthly body, can perhaps make its creations live is another problem. But it seems possible that it might be so. What for instance is the 40-inch death rate, which is double the rate of three-dimensional life? Is it not probable that it is the life rate of the higher dimension at a higher rate of vibration?

There I will leave this story and return while I may to the three-dimensional world with the green of the grass and the far off grumble of the sea on the pebble beach; to the buzzards wheeling over the combe and the gulls shouting to each other. All have life in them today in three dimensions; but it is becoming clear that although this life may apparently die, yet it remains alive in a fourth.

Perhaps I have really seen the green ray after all and been too occupied with trivialities to appreciate what I was looking at. Yes, of course this must be the case, for this morning just as I was finishing this book, I saw the swallows come.

At one moment there was no swallow to be seen anywhere. Suddenly some tiny specks swept in from the sea. They raced over the roof of the shed where last year’s nests are still on the rafters, passing over the ancient cider apple-tree, which is almost completely hollow and full of water.

And then, for an instant, they hung in the air fluttering. They swung round in a swift arc and swooped through the half-door into the shed. They had passed the end of their ray, which stretched from here across Africa, and for a second did not know what had happened. Then they realized they were home.

Endnotes

[l] Source: Chapter 12: ESP: Beyond Time and Distance; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.
[2] The first chapter of ESP begins with one of Lethbridge’s crew remarking: ‘Let’s see if we can see the green ray.’ To which Lethbridge replies: ‘I had never heard of the green ray and neither apparently had any of the company. We were told that it was a beam of light sent up by the sun at the last moment of its setting. If you could see the green ray, any wish you made would be granted. Anxious heads at once lined the ship’s rail, for some of the young men were interested in the girls on board. Judging by the results, one young man at least must have seen the thing. I saw nothing and never have seen the green ray. I do not know whether there is such a phenomenon, but I fancy that there is. If you stare too long at a bright light and then turn your eyes on to something else, you often see a green spot.’

Comments

Beyond the Lines by Tom Lethbridge

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:33:04 +0200

No one with the slightest curiosity in his make-up can resist experimenting with the information freely presented to him by the writers of letters. We saw that something of the personality of an Iron Age slinger remained for two thousand years in the field of the stone he slung.

It is just the same with a letter. Something of your personality remains in it, which is beyond what you said in the words you wrote on the paper. This is in accord with some modern theories of how memory functions, and although these have not yet been presented to the general seeker-after-truth, it seems evident to me that they must be nearer the correct answer than anything that has gone before. The holographic function of the mind is the coming idea.

What do you want to know about the people who have written to you? As this is, we hope, a scientific investigation, you want to catalogue them under various headings. We had over a hundred cards at Christmas and this seemed quite a big enough sample to learn something, although I might not believe what the pendulum said. Again and again I have to stress that I approach all this with complete disbelief. I am a most down-to-earth person and have had a scientific upbringing and training. I just do not accept anything the pendulum says without a struggle in my own mind.

You must understand that we have worked out a table of rates, which comprises many things, and it seemed reasonable to try some of these in relation to others. I chose 9½ inches, which appears to represent the psychic potential of a person, and which I call the psi rate; 16 inches which apparently indicates the sex potential; 19½, which stands for blood and may show something about its character; and 30 inches, which stands for age. It soon became clear that the age rate had no effect on the sex or psi potential. Nevertheless this is the one I am going to discuss now.

In all, we tested 120 specimens, and whenever we knew a person’s age the pendulum was right within two revolutions. The method was to start the pendulum gently swinging over the specimen of handwriting when it had been set at the 30 inches rate for age. Then, quite arbitrarily, but apparently correctly, we counted one year for each turn the pendulum made.

It is not easy to be quite sure when the revolutions start and when they stop and this is why one is liable to an error of a year at either end. Critics of this method must try it out for themselves before they are in a position to form any judgement of its accuracy. It sounds complete nonsense and yet it appears to work. The proof of the pudding is not in what it looks like, but in how it tastes. [2]

Not long ago, my publisher, Colin Franklin, set me off on a problem, which seems to be in the correct line. Put shortly, he wanted to know whether the reproductions of pictures still retained the sex rate of the painters of the originals. Now this is surely an important question and goes quite a long way to further the investigation. To enlarge it somewhat, one might ask whether a book carries with it part of the original field of force of the author.

If it should do so then a book might be compared with the laying on of hands in consecrating a priest. People have told me that there is a gap of 200 years in this ceremony and that power is no longer handed on in direct succession. I do not know about this; but the possibility that part of the author’s psyche-field might go with each copy of a book which he had written struck me as being very interesting. I did not believe it for a moment.

Now unless you are prepared to wander round public art galleries with a folio of reproductions and a pendulum, it is not very easy to find the answer to Colin Franklin’s question. I thought about it for some time before I hit on a possible way of testing it. I draw the illustrations, of doubtful value, which accompany my books. I asked him to send me back the original drawings from one of them. I supposed that they were filed somewhere and not destroyed when the blocks were made.

My idea was to test first an original drawing for the sex and thought rates and then to test the reproduction made from that drawing in a completely new and unopened copy of the book itself. Of course many people handled the drawings in the course of making the blocks from them and some slight handling may have occurred in the printing and binding of the book. That we had to risk, but the risk did not appear to be great.

In due course a folder of drawings arrived and I took them to the slate floor in the hall, where there should not be much interruption from anything but the slate. In a state of considerable interest, I put the first drawing on the floor and tested it for the rate for male sex of 24 inches and then for thought at 27 inches. It responded strongly to both.

Then I opened the new copy of the book at the figure made from the drawing and tested that. There was no reaction of any sort to either rate. The figure appeared to be dead. My wife and I went solemnly through the drawings and the prints made from them. All the drawings responded to the sex and thought rates. Nothing at all happened with the prints. There was no reaction for either rate from the book itself. There was not the slightest indication that any fragment of the author’s personality passed to the book, except that the printed word might mean something to the person who read it. There was no direct contact at all.

The book was not a link in any parapsychological sense between the author and the reader. There was nothing passing between an artist who painted a picture and the reproduction of that picture. The quality of the reproduction, however good it might be, is something entirely mechanical and lacking in the life force which had been impressed by the artist on the original. We have already seen the same kind of thing suggested by thinking about photographs. The photograph appears dead, so is the reproduction by mechanical means of an original picture. A hand-made copy would of course react to the sex rate of the person who made the copy.

The experiment was rather a relief to me. I had not been able to see how anything could really pass from original to reproduction. Whereas everything we had investigated before followed a logical course, however strange that course might appear to be, this transference of something to a reproduction seemed completely illogical. Yes, I was relieved. Crazy though we might seem to be; yet we were not so daft as all that. We had managed to put a brake on.

Endnotes

[1] Source: Chapter 9 in The Monkey's Tail; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, SBN 7100 6598 1.
[2] Source from here: Chapter 6 in ESP: Beyond Time and Distance; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.

Comments